Question about airplanes in GWX

Einsman · 09-10-07, 05:52 AM

Hello.

I have read Gwx's manual (1.03) and with the exception of a detail, everything was nice.

The detail is the following one: The AR-196, OS2U-3 "Kingfisher" they are the same plane.

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

Regards.

joea · 09-10-07, 06:44 AM

Clever jab...NOT. It's a subsim, not a flight sim.

Dowly · 09-10-07, 06:49 AM

.........................

melnibonian · 09-10-07, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

You're correct in what you're pointing out and the GWX Team thanks you for it. If it is possible to be fixed ti will.

Why you have to spoil everything by this kind of "silly" and "childish" comments?

The GWX Team has NOTHING to prove with respect to its determination and eagerness for work to ANYONE

CASE CLOSED

Einsman · 09-10-07, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melnibonian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

You're correct in what you're pointing out and the GWX Team thanks you for it. If it is possible to be fixed ti will.

Why you have to spoil everything by this kind of "silly" and "childish" comments?

The GWX Team has NOTHING to prove with respect to its determination and eagerness for work to ANYONE

CASE CLOSED

Hello again.

1. Yes, It's a subsim, not a flight sim. But, the OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float and it's not a Ar-196 but all we want the maximun of realism in this simulator.

2. It was not a silly commentary, only it was a sarcastic(*) commentary with humor without despising the work of anybody in the GWX team.

(*) ... because it is vocally oriented, sarcasm can be difficult to grasp in written form and is easily misinterpreted. To prevent this some people emphasize words with italics, bold, capitalization, and/or underlining (e.g. that’s just great); sarcastic comments on the Internet with an emoticon.

I would like to write something more, but I don't dominate this language and I don't want to be misinterpreted.

Sorry for my english

Regards.

Jimbuna · 09-10-07, 08:45 AM

Quote:

I would like to write something more, but I don't dominate this language and I don't want to be misinterpreted.

Sorry for my english

No need to apologise Kaleun Einsman, IMO your English is very good.

We all have an opinion on this forum and a choice as to what version of the game we play.
If your disappointed with the content and or quality of GWX you always have the option to revert back to stock/vanilla

melnibonian · 09-10-07, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

Quote:

Originally Posted by melnibonian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

You're correct in what you're pointing out and the GWX Team thanks you for it. If it is possible to be fixed ti will.

Why you have to spoil everything by this kind of "silly" and "childish" comments?

The GWX Team has NOTHING to prove with respect to its determination and eagerness for work to ANYONE

CASE CLOSED

Hello again.

1. Yes, It's a subsim, not a flight sim. But, the OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float and it's not a Ar-196 but all we want the maximun of realism in this simulator.

2. It was not a silly commentary, only it was a sarcastic(*) commentary with humor without despising the work of anybody in the GWX team.

(*) ... because it is vocally oriented, sarcasm can be difficult to grasp in written form and is easily misinterpreted. To prevent this some people emphasize words with italics, bold, capitalization, and/or underlining (e.g. that’s just great); sarcastic comments on the Internet with an emoticon.

I would like to write something more, but I don't dominate this language and I don't want to be misinterpreted.

Sorry for my english

Regards.

No worries mate. I did not realised this and I appologise

We're good and cool so go forth and enjoy GWX

As far as the planes are concerned as I said before if something can be done it will (it's a matter of time and practicality with the upcomming update)

denis_469 · 09-10-07, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

Hello.

I have read Gwx's manual (1.03) and with the exception of a detail, everything was nice.

The detail is the following one: The AR-196, OS2U-3 "Kingfisher" they are the same plane.

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

Regards.

New version Kingfisher - like foro - made now.
Find unit LBSKingFisher=гидросамолёт "Кингфишер"
Plane like in foto.

joea · 09-10-07, 10:07 AM

No problem man, don't worry about it, if anything you have a nice eye for detail.

bigboywooly · 09-10-07, 10:52 AM

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

:rotfl:

Dowly · 09-10-07, 10:55 AM

Ssssh :rotfl:

Kpt. Lehmann · 09-10-07, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

:rotfl:

Yeah, lazy my A$$. Einsman, what have you contributed to the community chest lately? I can't seem to find your mods.

<chews another handful of nails >

While I am at it... How much did you pay for GWX???

Nevermind me. I'm just being sarcastic.

Kaleu. Jochen Mohr · 09-10-07, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

:rotfl:

Yeah, lazy my A$$. Einsman, what have you contributed to the community chest lately? I can't seem to find your mods.

<chews another handful of nails >

While I am at it... How much did you pay for GWX???

Nevermind me. I'm just being sarcastic.

do's helping on a mod counts to ? :hmm:

Einsman · 09-10-07, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

:rotfl:

My Silent Hunter III configuration is:

- Clean copy Silent Hunter III (NO MODS)
- Patch 1.4 Ubisoft
- GWX 1.03

This plane is showed in Musseum with GWX 1.03.

Is showed too in Figure 327 (pag. 270) Manual GWX 1.03

My commentaries have been done after seeing these images. I see totally disproportionate all the commentaries of the team GWX.

bigboywooly · 09-10-07, 01:37 PM

Not all things can be done at once
The " new " Kingfisher is from GWX 1.04

09-10-07, 05:52 AM	#1
Einsman Engineer Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: In one place in the Atlantic, say A Coruña, Galiza (Spain) Posts: 214 Downloads: 187 Uploads: 0	Question about airplanes in GWX Hello. I have read Gwx's manual (1.03) and with the exception of a detail, everything was nice. The detail is the following one: The AR-196, OS2U-3 "Kingfisher" they are the same plane. The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p? Regards. Last edited by Einsman; 09-10-07 at 05:54 AM. Reason: Change in title

09-10-07, 10:52 AM	#10
bigboywooly Rear Admiral Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Swindon, England Posts: 10,151 Downloads: 35 Uploads: 0	You must have an old version of GWX Mine dont look anything like that :rotfl: __________________ My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41

09-10-07, 01:37 PM	#15
bigboywooly Rear Admiral Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Swindon, England Posts: 10,151 Downloads: 35 Uploads: 0	Not all things can be done at once The " new " Kingfisher is from GWX 1.04 __________________ My mediafire page http://www.mediafire.com/?11eoq19bq9r41

09-10-07, 06:44 AM	#2
joea Silent Hunter Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: At periscope depth in Lake Geneva Posts: 3,512 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	Clever jab...NOT. It's a subsim, not a flight sim.

09-10-07, 06:49 AM	#3
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,055 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	.........................

09-10-07, 10:07 AM	#9
joea Silent Hunter Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: At periscope depth in Lake Geneva Posts: 3,512 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	No problem man, don't worry about it, if anything you have a nice eye for detail.

09-10-07, 10:55 AM	#11
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,055 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	Ssssh :rotfl: