SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Question about airplanes in GWX

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- SHIII Mods Workshop (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=195)

- - Question about airplanes in GWX (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=121939)

Question about airplanes in GWX

Hello.

I have read Gwx's manual (1.03) and with the exception of a detail, everything was nice. :up:

The detail is the following one: The AR-196, OS2U-3 "Kingfisher" they are the same plane.

http://static1.filefront.com/images/...g.thumb500.jpg

http://static1.filefront.com/images/...g.thumb500.jpg

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

http://static1.filefront.com/images/...x.thumb500.jpg

Regards.

Clever jab...NOT. It's a subsim, not a flight sim. :shifty:

:roll:.........................:damn:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

You're correct in what you're pointing out and the GWX Team thanks you for it. If it is possible to be fixed ti will.

Why you have to spoil everything by this kind of "silly" and "childish" comments? :down:

The GWX Team has NOTHING to prove with respect to its determination and eagerness for work to ANYONE

CASE CLOSED

Quote:

Originally Posted by melnibonian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

Hello again.

1. Yes, It's a subsim, not a flight sim. But, the OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float and it's not a Ar-196 but all we want the maximun of realism in this simulator.

2. It was not a silly commentary, only it was a sarcastic(*) commentary with humor without despising the work of anybody in the GWX team.

(*) ... because it is vocally oriented, sarcasm can be difficult to grasp in written form and is easily misinterpreted. To prevent this some people emphasize words with italics, bold, capitalization, and/or underlining (e.g. that’s just great); sarcastic comments on the Internet with an emoticon.

I would like to write something more, but I don't dominate this language and I don't want to be misinterpreted.

Sorry for my english

Regards.

Quote:

I would like to write something more, but I don't dominate this language and I don't want to be misinterpreted.

Sorry for my english

No need to apologise Kaleun Einsman, IMO your English is very good. :yep:
We all have an opinion on this forum and a choice as to what version of the game we play.
If your disappointed with the content and or quality of GWX you always have the option to revert back to stock/vanilla :arrgh!:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

Quote:

Originally Posted by melnibonian

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

The OS2U-3 "Kingsfisher" had a only float. It's a oblivion, simply clone units, laziness to modeling a new plane :p?

No worries mate. I did not realised this and I appologise :oops:

We're good and cool so go forth and enjoy GWX ;) :up: As far as the planes are concerned as I said before if something can be done it will (it's a matter of time and practicality with the upcomming update)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einsman

New version Kingfisher - like foro - made now.
Find unit LBSKingFisher=гидросамолёт "Кингфишер"
Plane like in foto.

No problem man, don't worry about it, if anything you have a nice eye for detail.

:zzz:

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h2...Kingfisher.jpg

:rotfl:

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

:zzz:

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h2...Kingfisher.jpg

:rotfl:

Yeah, lazy my A$$. Einsman, what have you contributed to the community chest lately? I can't seem to find your mods.

<chews another handful of nails >

While I am at it... How much did you pay for GWX???

:stare:

Nevermind me. I'm just being sarcastic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kpt. Lehmann

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

:zzz:

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

:rotfl:

do's helping on a mod counts to ? :hmm:

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigboywooly

:zzz:

You must have an old version of GWX

Mine dont look anything like that

http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h2...Kingfisher.jpg

:rotfl:

My Silent Hunter III configuration is:

- Clean copy Silent Hunter III (NO MODS)
- Patch 1.4 Ubisoft
- GWX 1.03

This plane is showed in Musseum with GWX 1.03.

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/7...gfisherhz7.jpg

Is showed too in Figure 327 (pag. 270) Manual GWX 1.03

My commentaries have been done after seeing these images. I see totally disproportionate all the commentaries of the team GWX.

Not all things can be done at once
The " new " Kingfisher is from GWX 1.04