SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-07, 10:08 AM   #1
Bloody Bill
Watch
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 23
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default Hull integrity in GWX

Just out of curiosity, I have loaded GWX and noticed that the hull integrity % is no longer on the damage management screen. Was that intentional? It would be helpful since I got my type 9 shot up, fixed the damage, dove to evade, and the boat crushed at 140 meters.

Thanks
Bloody Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 10:10 AM   #2
Paajtor
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Dutch mountains
Posts: 1,551
Downloads: 64
Uploads: 1
Default

Yes, that's intentional.
If you want it back, get the latest SH3Commander...it has an option to enable it again.
__________________



Paajtor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 10:35 AM   #3
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,255
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

I find the % hull deal kind of a gimme'. How would an engineer know what the exact hull % is? He would not. All he could do is make recommendations to dive deep or not.I was hoping the GWX team could come up with a hull integrity of "good" "fair" "no way in hell would I dive" type deal instead of the exact %. Just a little more realism. Anyway, I've got bitten by the no hull integrity % showing
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 11:24 AM   #4
Corsair
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toulouse France
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 51
Uploads: 0
Default

Good idea there... problem is that on one hand it is right to say they wouldn't be good enough to tell exactly, on the other it is surprising they would be so stupid they don't have any clue...
I think it's the same problem with range given by WO : it's too much he can give a range precise to the meter, it's not enough he can't say anything at all.
So each player makes a choice according to his own taste...
__________________


NYGM 3.4A / Living SH3 V5.1 + SH3 Commander
Corsair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 11:31 AM   #5
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,255
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corsair
Good idea there... problem is that on one hand it is right to say they wouldn't be good enough to tell exactly, on the other it is surprising they would be so stupid they don't have any clue...
I think it's the same problem with range given by WO : it's too much he can give a range precise to the meter, it's not enough he can't say anything at all.
So each player makes a choice according to his own taste...

True!
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 01:04 PM   #6
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,518
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

I like the hull integrity showing because IMO there would be some kind of understanding as to what damage had been sustained....(if not a really accurate one)
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 01:20 PM   #7
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,255
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Thats the discussion. If we are given a figure that is exact, it is not realistic. My thoughts were just a best guess response from engineer. You as the captain make you best decision on this. If I know the hull is at 10%, I will know a kid with a straw and a spit ball of paper is going to sink me. If I know the hull is in 'fair shape', the possiblity of water breaching is a very real matter. It is up to me to decide how deep to go at that point. Either we make it or I end up killing all crew.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 01:22 PM   #8
High Voltage
Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: U-33. Depth Charges...sinking..
Posts: 325
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I have ben playing with no hull integrity, but based on your arguments, i admit it's foolish to play not having any idea of the shape of your boat, so i will be enabling this option next campaign.
__________________
The new-moon night is black as ink.
Off Hatteras the tankers sink.
While sadly Roosevelt counts the score--
Some fifty thousand tons--by
MOHR
High Voltage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 01:34 PM   #9
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,518
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Thats the discussion. If we are given a figure that is exact, it is not realistic. My thoughts were just a best guess response from engineer. You as the captain make you best decision on this. If I know the hull is at 10%, I will know a kid with a straw and a spit ball of paper is going to sink me. If I know the hull is in 'fair shape', the possiblity of water breaching is a very real matter. It is up to me to decide how deep to go at that point. Either we make it or I end up killing all crew.
You also have the randomisation of crush depth to take into consideration
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 01:49 PM   #10
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,255
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

For me, I like not having the hull integrity showing. Reason being is this(probably the reason I do not finish patrol #2), under the water, DC creating flooding, the engineers can look at the inside of the hull. They can not look at the outside...not until the boat is surfaced. Generally, they are making an educated guess as to what the boat can take. He will never be 100% sure of what the boat can handle. We are given a % for hull integrity that is giving you an exact measurement. You then base you decision on this. Not too realistic to me. If you have been DC'd quite a bit, a lot of flooding and repairs...you can deduce that the hull is not in the best of shape. Transit home,no further attacks on escorted vessels and no deep diving is in order. This is your decision as the Captain. It is this small room of doubt that make it just a little more exciting and realistic to me.

At this time all we have is hull integrity scale on or off. There is no inbetween. So it all is a matter of taste concerning this scale.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 01:57 PM   #11
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,518
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Fair comment.....let the individual make their own choice
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 03:08 PM   #12
IceGrog
Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA on the edge of the Pacific
Posts: 217
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody Bill
GWX.....the hull integrity % is no longer on the damage management screen......
i'm running GWX..................and do have a gage for hull integrity,,,,,,,, it's all that balck stuff gushing out of my boat and the blacken sides....
__________________
U-551 7th Flottille
Laid down: 21 Nov, 1939, Blohm & Voss, Hamburg
Commissioned: 7 Nov, 1940
Commander: Kptlt. IceGrog von Ritter
Sunk: 12/11/1940, 01/01/1941, 10/16/1941, 01/16/1942, 08/04/1943

.................................................. ..........
A bartender is just a pharmacist with a limited inventory
IceGrog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 03:22 PM   #13
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,255
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceGrog
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody Bill
GWX.....the hull integrity % is no longer on the damage management screen......
i'm running GWX..................and do have a gage for hull integrity,,,,,,,, it's all that balck stuff gushing out of my boat and the blacken sides....

Well, yes...there is that. I do not use the % scale for hull. I just use my intuition and how bad I just go my butt kicked.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-07, 03:31 PM   #14
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,518
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceGrog
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody Bill
GWX.....the hull integrity % is no longer on the damage management screen......
i'm running GWX..................and do have a gage for hull integrity,,,,,,,, it's all that balck stuff gushing out of my boat and the blacken sides....
:rotfl: :rotfl:
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.