Is the US supporting the bad guy?

[Hottentot]

Originally Posted by antikristuseke

the world is not black and white

(Pst, you took the wrong door. This is the internet. You want the second door on the left for real life. Cookies and refreshments are served next to the first door on the left, help yourself on your way out.)

[Catfish]

Originally Posted by Platapus

The United States is always supporting the bad guys
The United States is always supporting the good guys
All depends on your perspective.

Here's another one (german but english subtitles):

[MH]

Very funny Catfish.

Ohh... damn Americans they are all that stands between all the people of the world singing Kumbaya....




at least he doesn't blame the Jews....pewww
But again that might cost him lawsuit lol.



.........

[Platapus]

Originally Posted by Platapus

The United States is always supporting the bad guys
The United States is always supporting the good guys

All depends on your perspective.

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Yet neither statement can be true.

I disagree, Both are often true as it seems like the US is always spending money supporting someone!

[_dgn_]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

If we are supporting the bad guy, then it wouldn't be the first time.

Originally Posted by Platapus

The United States is always supporting the bad guys
The United States is always supporting the good guys

All depends on your perspective.

Originally Posted by Rockstar

Video aside, the fighting in Syria does somewhat remind me of Afganistan in the 80's

US supporting the bad guy ?

It's frequent !

Remember :

- Ho Chi Minh
- Ferdinand Marcos
- Manuel Noriega
- Osama bin Laden

After helping United States (or being helped by the US), these men became the "black sheep" for Washington ...

What a perspicacity !

at least he doesn't blame the Jews....pewww

But he does, he blames the Jewish extremists and the Muslim extremists
Its a bit dated now though him talking about taking two loonies like sharon and yasser throwing them in a padded cell to give the people a break.

I disagree, Both are often true

Often isn't always

[MH]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

But he does, he blames the Jewish extremists and the Muslim extremists

At least Jewish extremist don't want the Iranians to have the weapons that Putin has and Hussein could have whith french help.

[MH]

Originally Posted by Platapus

I disagree, Both are often true as it seems like the US is always spending money supporting someone!

I think that up till second Iraqi war USA did a good job in channeling ME anger and it did not coast so much money vs the benefits.

At least Jewish extremist don't want the Iranians to have the weapons that Putin has and Hussein could have whith french help.

Clueless
The extremists need the big end of the world war to get their magic temple built, you can't have an end of the world war if you stop the opposing nuts getting the weapons.

I think that up till second Iraqi war USA did a good job in channeling ME anger and it did not coast so much money vs the benefits.

What benefits????

[MH]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Clueless
The extremists need the big end of the world war to get their magic temple built, you can't have an end of the world war if you stop the opposing nuts getting the weapons

Ohh... those extremist...so i better start zealously practicing all three religions.'
you never know.

Ohh... those extremist...so i better start zealously practicing all three religions.'
you never know.

yes those, though no need to practice all three, for one of them you just have to suddenly stop being Jewish as it all kicks off to make the magic work