SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 5
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-09, 02:36 PM   #16
Webster
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

a year or two ago we had a long discussion about this (i think it was in sh4 mods forum) and with all the data found, it was clear that sub hooks were made and used (i cant remember if both sides tried it or not) but after several types were tried they found it was more likely the destroyer would in most cases recieve more damage than the sub and if it snagged the bottom it was almost a certainty that the DD would be sunk or have its stern severely damaged.

the only time they found records of use of the hooks were almost exclusively used in harbors and protected ports. the reason the idea came up was because DD would often damage themselves in shallow water depthcharging so a better safer way was wanted to damage subs in shallow water.

the testing they did found that dragging just the cables would often work better than using them with the hooks because the cables would often cut into sub hulls enough to cause more flooding or foul the subs rudder or propellers, but it did this without severely damaging the DD at the same time.

dragging just the cables was looked at as a better solution than using hooks but in the end the whole idea of dragging anything was decided to be less effective and more dangerous then just have DD go faster when dropping depth charges so they could avoid the shock wave.

now this thread was like 2 years ago and i have no links or data to back all this up so if you want to say im wrong or argue the point then just ignore what i've said on the subject but the guys in the discussion had facts and links to back up what they were saying and knew what they were talking about.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-09, 05:45 PM   #17
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

IT's not like the cable would snag and harm either. The whole idea is that when it hit, the escort hears it, and can prosecute the attack.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-09, 05:53 PM   #18
FIREWALL
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
Default

If harbors then were as polluted as they are now the, Stink alone would have scared a sub outta there.
__________________
RIP FIREWALL

I Play GWX. Silent Hunter Who ???
FIREWALL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 06:11 AM   #19
NoLine
Medic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AN85
Posts: 167
Downloads: 55
Uploads: 0
Default

This reminds me off this story.

Noline
NoLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 10:07 AM   #20
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,549
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

I seem to recall the Japanese tried it on occasion but have never heard of the allies following suit
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is online   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 12:50 PM   #21
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum View Post
I think you might be confusing mass and weight.
Possibly. It wouldn't be the first time.

Quote:
When any boat is not sinking or rising it's weight is zero because the
mass of displaced water is equal to the mass of the boat.
So if a diver came upon the submerged sub, he would be able to push it as if it wasn't there? Or if a fisherman snagged it he could just reel it in? That doesn't sound right to me. The thing still has the same mass, and any attempt to hook it is going to meet with that many tons of resistance.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 02:58 PM   #22
Schultz
Officer
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bucharest - Romania
Posts: 237
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

I one of the hooks catches some holes of the hull of the sub it would just rip it apart, how it happend in the movie
__________________
Old nickname: Infernos
http://www.overheat.ro/
Schultz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 03:02 PM   #23
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
So if a diver came upon the submerged sub, he would be able to push it as if it wasn't there? Or if a fisherman snagged it he could just reel it in? That doesn't sound right to me. The thing still has the same mass, and any attempt to hook it is going to meet with that many tons of resistance.
It's not the weight that would stop him, but the momentum and drag that
would make is difficult to move the sub fast. However, the diver would
theoretically be able to get the sub moving with virtually no effort, just very
slowly at first because of the momentum/inertia and then not reach a high
top speed because of the drag.
The weight of the sub would not be an issue as it has no weight in the
water at neutral buoyancy. Inertia and drag would be the big issues.
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 04:33 PM   #24
Webster
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
IT's not like the cable would snag and harm either. The whole idea is that when it hit, the escort hears it, and can prosecute the attack.

actually tater that was exacly what happened, they had to pull them faster than a trawler does so the hooks would hook into the hull and not slide off.

they couldnt use depth charges which was rthe reason for the hooks not as a detection method but they were meant as an offensive weapon of their own.

DD would often go too fast by using the same running attack tactics as if they were depth charging so when it snagged something then something was ripped off, either the subs hull or the DD rear deck was damaged. the winches were literally ripped off the decks along with everything it was attatched to and all the rigging for them and it often messed up the decks to the point repairs couldnt be avoided. in one case the DD snagged the rockbed and it was badly damaged.

if DD went too slow then subs could easily move out of the way by going to flank since they were noisy and im sure they could hear where the hooks were dragging. another drawback was the rear racks were removed so you lose those as weapons and trawlers didnt have enough mass to do the job so they werent a good choice to use the sub hooks.

its not like dropping a trawl over the back end and tying it to a moring cleat.

Last edited by Webster; 10-10-09 at 04:46 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 05:10 PM   #25
othr
Mate
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Downloads: 83
Uploads: 0
Default

Imagine the submarine as a very big paddle. VERY big paddle, now imagine the said diver try and paddle with it.
othr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 06:40 PM   #26
Sledgehammer427
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
Default

I don't they would try to "catch" the sub.

IIRC the japanese would "Hook" a sub and let go of it, buoy attached. that way you can watch exactly where this sub is going, and there was even some oddball way to tether a pole (with buoy) to it and guess within a few feet how deep the sub was.
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer
Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168)
114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed
V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C!
Sledgehammer427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-09, 06:51 PM   #27
Hartmann
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Grid CH 26, Spain ,Barcelona
Posts: 1,857
Downloads: 204
Uploads: 0
Default

I´s better use a giant net with some explosive devices attached to it

__________________
But this ship can't sink!...

She is made of iron, sir. I assure you, she can. and she will. It is a mathematical certainty.

Strength and honor
Hartmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-09, 11:38 AM   #28
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,549
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Now we know where they got the idea to track jaws from

__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is online   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-09, 12:02 PM   #29
The Bandit
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 395
Downloads: 39
Uploads: 1
Default

I will have to look up the incident specifically but as I recall some of our RCN guys in WWII did something kind of similar. They were low on DCs and they had a Uboat pinned so they dragged a DC on a chain with some kind of contact detonator if I recall correct. As far as I remember it worked and after detonation they had debris coming up to the surface. I will have to go through my books to find the exact incident.
__________________
The Bandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-09, 08:01 AM   #30
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,549
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bandit View Post
I will have to look up the incident specifically but as I recall some of our RCN guys in WWII did something kind of similar. They were low on DCs and they had a Uboat pinned so they dragged a DC on a chain with some kind of contact detonator if I recall correct. As far as I remember it worked and after detonation they had debris coming up to the surface. I will have to go through my books to find the exact incident.
That sounds very interesting.....hope you find the reference
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is online   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.