SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-11, 03:41 AM   #1
Paul Riley
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
Is it possible for ships clearly hit well below the waterline to remain afloat?

Last night I hit a medium cargo in the foresection (one roughly below the stack and a second below the foremast) with 2 impact tips set to 5m.Just over an hour later the vessel began to slowly take on water and slow to a stop,and approx 30mins later began to sink on even keel.I didnt want to expend a third torpedo on it as I am currently in a small IIA and I only have 3 left,so this is the reason I hung around so long to see what happened.I dont really care how long it takes so long as that cargo hits the bottom!.
Would it be safe to say that this was normal for ships that had two gaping holes in their hulls,and is it also possible for ships to even remain afloat and carry on their journey? or,do all ships eventually sink in the end,due to a large hole being in their hull?
NOTE - I have the realistic sinking times on.

Cheers.
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes
Paul Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 03:42 AM   #2
Paul Riley
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
Default

Do any of you think the torpedoes are slightly underpowered in GWX3,or are the ships hulls more resistant? I have even had SMALL (well under 4.000 tonnes!) cargo vessels take two shots and remain afloat,only slowing by a knot or two (although this doesnt happen all the time)
If the former,is there a mod that increases torpedo power slightly?.I do NOT want an underwater nuke here!
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes
Paul Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 03:47 AM   #3
Snestorm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Some ships are compartmentalised better than others, and can be real tough guys.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 03:49 AM   #4
Paul Riley
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snestorm View Post
Some ships are compartmentalised better than others, and can be real tough guys.
Even in 1939? sure I can understand better welding techniques as the war progressed,but werent a lot of ships in the early phases old WWI vessels? especially the ones leased by America.
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes
Paul Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 03:59 AM   #5
Snestorm
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

C2, C3, T2, T3 were fairly new designs.

How a ships is compartmented (water-tight bulkheads) has nothing to do with welding.

The C2 Cargo (GWX Medium Cargo) is a solid ship.
I've spent as many as five torpedoes to sink one C2.

If I had to play as a merchant, that would be my baby!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 06:02 AM   #6
sublynx
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
Default

I remember reading somewhere that one torpedoed shipwreck was just left floating once the sailors had been evacuated, then a U-boat pounded the wreck with a deck gun for tens of rounds, and then just left the wreck, that was still floating. Historically speaking it would be ok just to assess the damage done and make an assumption that the ship can't be sailed again and report to BdU a ship most likely sunk, eventually.

Of course the game engine doesn't simulate this, so if you would leave a ship waiting for it to sink and it didn't, you would have to modify the save game files to your liking, if you still wanted the renown that should be coming to you. Too much trouble IMO, just leave the ship, hope for best, and wait for the VII or IX - then you'll be able to blow wrecks to smithereens with that one extra torpedo. There's lots of fish in the seas that shipwreck came from.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS
sublynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 08:09 AM   #7
flag4
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: as far away as possible
Posts: 1,625
Downloads: 147
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Riley View Post
Last night I hit a medium cargo in the foresection (one roughly below the stack and a second below the foremast) with 2 impact tips set to 5m.Just over an hour later the vessel began to slowly take on water and slow to a stop,and approx 30mins later began to sink on even keel.I didnt want to expend a third torpedo on it as I am currently in a small IIA and I only have 3 left,so this is the reason I hung around so long to see what happened.I dont really care how long it takes so long as that cargo hits the bottom!.
Would it be safe to say that this was normal for ships that had two gaping holes in their hulls,and is it also possible for ships to even remain afloat and carry on their journey? or,do all ships eventually sink in the end,due to a large hole being in their hull?
NOTE - I have the realistic sinking times on.

Cheers.
yes it is possible. some never sink - are towed back to port and repaired. some just lie flat at water level awaiting their fate. depends how fatal the torp strike was.
some sink in minutes others hours or days. also depends what they are carrying.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
' We are here on Earth to fart around.
Don't let anybody tell you any different.'
Kurt Vonnegut
flag4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 09:16 AM   #8
Paul Riley
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
Default Tramp steamer of only 1.600 GRT takes two perfect shots before sinking

Quote:
Originally Posted by flag4 View Post
yes it is possible. some never sink - are towed back to port and repaired. some just lie flat at water level awaiting their fate. depends how fatal the torp strike was.
some sink in minutes others hours or days. also depends what they are carrying.
I have just this minute hit a tramp steamer in AN16 slightly behind the stack at 4m depth,vessel began to list slightly to the stern but after nearly 2hrs it is no lower in the water,so I fired a second aimed slightly behind the original impact site,steamer has two HUGE holes in its portside,and went down finally stern first,after two well placed shots.
Sank for around 1.600 GRT.And in the past I have nailed much larger ships with a single shot.
Oh well,this is the law of the sea I guess
Oh,I think they were carrying toilet rolls,they are gonna bloody need em for next time I return to AN16.
Thanks for the reply.
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes
Paul Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 12:15 PM   #9
Missing Name
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 748
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0
Default

I can't remember where I saw it, but there were two ships in WWI that were both split in half but stayed afloat long enough to be salvaged. Then they welded the two halves together to make a new ship.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: Japanese auxiliary cruiser, 15000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive.



Read Brag's stuff
Missing Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 12:51 PM   #10
Paul Riley
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing Name View Post
I can't remember where I saw it, but there were two ships in WWI that were both split in half but stayed afloat long enough to be salvaged. Then they welded the two halves together to make a new ship.
Incredible
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes
Paul Riley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 01:00 PM   #11
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Not u-boats in the Atlantic, but here is the account by USS Whale of the difficulty of sinking some ships.
Quote:
Fired three torpedoes. Three hits. One hit aft of his stack, the second blew wreckage up through forward hold and the third
hit aft. Target started turning toward us. Swung hard right and set up for a stern shot.

Fired single stern shot at range of 600 yards. Hit aft. This was a good hit, stopping the target cold. The target was
sinking by the stern, taking considerable port list. Took pictures, firmly convinced this was the graveyard of another
Japanese ship. Many of the crew had an opportunity to view the sinking ship through the periscope.

Having worked up to windward to observe target better, was astonished to find the fire under control and the list
corrected. Water was being pumped over the side through portable hoses. Fired another torpedo from the stern tube, but this
missed. Target was dead in the water, shooting wildly with deck guns.

Crew and passengers abandoned ship, although gun crew remained at posts. Target settled about ten feet overall and then
maintained its depth. Closed and fired sixth torpedo from bow tubes. This hit aft of superstructure depth.

Target still floating. Fired seventh torpedo from bow tubes. This hit with terrific concussion, but did not change trim or draft appreciably.
Fired eighth torpedo from stern tubes. This was heard to hit, but very little concussion was felt.

Getting dark. Target sinking slowly on an even keel, but still looks salvageable. There was no sign of life aboard,
although it was believed gun crews had not yet abandoned ship. Wishing to dispose of it before arrival of planes or rescue
ships, fired ninth torpedo. This hit right under stack and the explosion ripped away both sides of vessel about ten feet
below the main deck.

Target now settled more rapidly, the main deck being a few feet from wash condition at last observation. This vessel
had absorbed seven and possibly eight torpedo hits. The cargo must have been of such nature as to prevent her from sinking
more rapidly. Target was identified as the Heiyou Maru, 9,815 tons.

On retiring we found ourselves in the midst of eight boats full of survivors, approximately fifty men to each boat.
These men were dressed in both white and blue uniforms. One boat was passed close aboard, and survivors made ready to hit
the periscope with their oars.
On the other hand is the story of a Japanese merchant that was sunk...by a dud!
Quote:
0540.
3rd. March, 1943.
From: Muroran, southern Hokkaido Island.
To: Shimizu, Shizuoka Prefecture.
No. 2303B.
Hokuto Maru, Bansei Maru, Kotai Maru, Sumida Maru, Taisei Maru (5).
auxiliary gunboat No. 2 Hiyoshi Maru (1).
At 0630 on the 4th. of March while at position 39.33N 142.07E, in the Todosaki Sea, Iwate Prefecture Hokuto Maru, a 2267 ton ship owned by the Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line was attacked by the U.S.S. Permit. Three torpedo tracks were seen, one struck the ship on the port side in the forward part of No. 1 hold area, it proved to be a dud. The following two missiles were avoided.

In fact Permit had fired three torpedoes and claimed damage on the target by one of them.

Immediately afterward a periscope was seen 250 meters of the port bow of Hokuto Maru, it was presumed that the enemy submarine was trying to get between the columns to conduct a second attack for shortly after it was seen on the surface.
The maru tried to ram the intruder but the move had to be aborted as she was likely to collide with the nearby Sumida Maru, so at 0637 Hokuto Maru resumed her position, by then the enemy had submerged.

Permit fired two torpedoes in a second attack about this time but made no claim for a sinking or damage.

At 0640 it was realized that the Hokuto Maru was taking in considerable water at the point of the dud torpedo impact, so attempts were made to stem the flow, also she headed towards the coast. By now she was down by the bow and it became vital to press onward, however at 0643 the engines came to a stop, a few minutes later abandon ship was ordered and her crew transferred to the No. 2 Hiyoshi Maru. Hokuto Maru continued to slowly sink, finally at 0712 her stern rose up vertically and under she went.
At the time she was carrying 2080 tons of coal.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-11, 04:32 AM   #12
Captain Nemo
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,144
Downloads: 54
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing Name View Post
I can't remember where I saw it, but there were two ships in WWI that were both split in half but stayed afloat long enough to be salvaged. Then they welded the two halves together to make a new ship.
Seen it happen in SH3. I hit a passenger cargo with a couple of torps and it split in two and both halves remained afloat. I got the "She's going down" message so got the credit for the sinking even though it didn't sink as such. They remained afloat for the rest of the patrol, as occasionally I would pass back near the site where the red ship sunk icon was on the map and they were still there but both parts had drifted away from each other by some distance. I'll have to dig through my screen shots and if I have them will post them on this thread.

Nemo
__________________
"I'm afraid there is no disguising the fact that King's obsession with the Pacific and the Battle of Washington cost us dear in the Battle of the Atlantic".

Sir John Slessor GCB, DSO, MC, DL
AOC-in-C Coastal Command RAF
___________________________________________
Captain Nemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-12, 04:16 PM   #13
jreid666
Helmsman
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: fraserburgh
Posts: 104
Downloads: 296
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing Name View Post
I can't remember where I saw it, but there were two ships in WWI that were both split in half but stayed afloat long enough to be salvaged. Then they welded the two halves together to make a new ship.
Would that happen to be the Taffelberg? Stuck a mine, limped home, then welded together i think. I maybe wrong though.
jreid666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-12, 04:46 PM   #14
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

The post just above yours identified them correctly, Though neither one was actually split in half. One had her bow blown off, the other her stern.

On the other hand in WW2 HMS Javelin lost both stern and bow, but survived to be rebuilt.

And here's what you do with a split-in-two tanker.
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=170723
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-11, 03:43 PM   #15
OuNiS
Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poland
Posts: 209
Downloads: 70
Uploads: 0
Default

Yes it's possible. As I remember I read about that situations in Blair's "Hitlers's Uboat War" for example (or few Edwards's books). Some ships may sial under the balast (such wood or (better) cork, which is lighter than wood) and in this case they are harder to sink. Another way is a construction of the ship. Older tramp steamers are generally better to sink than modern freighters.

Ok. You must remember that I talked about real life situations not in a game life!
__________________
sorry for my english...
Kptlt. Franz Vuttke, U-702

Last edited by OuNiS; 07-18-11 at 04:03 PM.
OuNiS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.