![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 12
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What are the ranges for the aircraft patroling from japanese held wake island? I've figured that the zero's have a radius of 700 km but I've been engaged by g4m Bettys at 1400 km from the island. How far out will these annoying flies venture?
Another small question: I've seem to have lost the "line of sight" (the one showing what direction the torpedo will travel and time for it to reach that destination) on the attack map, what did I do to loose it? Cheers, Matthias |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]() Quote:
The thing that seems unrealistic to me is using Wake Island as a base for these planes. As an American outpost it never supported more than a tiny squadron of F4F Wildcat fighters and a few PBY Catalina recon flying boats in the lagoon. Given the size of the atoll (3 square miles) I doubt the airstrip could have been enlarged to accommodate the G4M bombers. Not without a great deal of effort, and Japan's construction resources were always sorely stretched. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 930
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I use 500nm as a rule of thumb and place that type of circle over Tokyo, Okinawa and Iwo Jima for starters just to give me a general idea when I am within air patrol range. So far it has worked as a 'start line' for when I should pay more attention to the air threat. Having said that, the large flying boats obviously have much more range and I may get caught out one of these patrols but so far so good with the 500nm circles.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 12
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
ok, I'll try those 500 nm radius circles.
/Matthias |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Gunner
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 100
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() Craig Ferguson: "Shouldn't they be hunting Godzilla? A whale isn't going to destroy Tokyo; Godzilla is!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere else now
Posts: 1,733
Downloads: 825
Uploads: 4
|
![]() Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G4M_Betty Incidently the Zero had a longer range, and also flamed like a Ronson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Zero ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Interesting to note that Wake Island became something of a backwater after the December 1941 battle. Although Japan fortified the island heavily it was cut off from any further resupply by 1944 as Japan's merchant marine shrank. In the garrison 600 Japanese soldiers died from American carrier air attacks, and 1,300 from starvation. Those troops left who surrendered after the war's end had been reduced to eating birds and rats. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
torplexed, the Japanese actually did improve the facilities on Wake Island greatly from what I have read and did operate large aircraft such as G4M's and patrol planes, had fighters as well.Remember, the Japanese took Wake Island when they were at their peak in WW II.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 12
Downloads: 57
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
That's some good info right there, thank you for the replies.
Now how about that second small question I had regarding the attack map? //Matthias |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Mate
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 54
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
g4m, map, wake |
|
|