SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-08, 11:02 AM   #1
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default The poker game continues in the latest satillite shootdown

I guess it all comes down to what do you want to show your enemy - the possible secrets of your spy satillites? Or the fact that our Aegis SM Block 3 can leave the atmosphere no problem? Or the fact that this SM Block 3 can kill your sat too with only a minor software mod?

Seems the idea of not letting an enemy getting it's hands on our spy sat capability is a more important hand to play than to let the world know what the true capability of the SM Block 3 is.

Let the poker game continue. The US still has all the chips, though its potential rivals just picked up a few.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us...ml?ref=science

-S

__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 11:38 AM   #2
geetrue
Cold War Boomer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

You should rename your thread that they shot down the darn thing ...

I had to go to the link to find this out ...

Quote:
Video of the unusual operation showed the missile leaving a bright trail as it streaked toward the satellite, and then a flash, a fireball, a plume and a cloud as the interceptor, at a minimum, appeared to have found its target, a satellite that went dead shortly after being launched in 2006.
All of this talk about shooting down a spy satellite and I didn't know it never even worked ... perhaps someone shot a laser weapon at it shortly after it was launched for all we know.

Didn't CIA lose like three of these things at the cost of a billion dollars each on the launch pad in California back in the late 90's ...

yep, I think so.
__________________
geetrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 11:38 AM   #3
Kapitan_Phillips
Silent Hunter
 
Kapitan_Phillips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Swansea
Posts: 3,903
Downloads: 204
Uploads: 0
Default

Or perhaps they just wanted to blow sumptin up!
__________________
Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into.
Kapitan_Phillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 02:46 PM   #4
RickC Sniper
Undetectable
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,221
Downloads: 132
Uploads: 0
Default

You know they were drooling at the opportunity to test fire the missle at something.
__________________

Support Subsim http://www.subsim.com/store.html
RickC Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 02:51 PM   #5
DeepIron
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Too far from the Pacific right now...
Posts: 1,634
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Ironic that the Chinese shot one of their own down a last year and are now belly-aching about the US action...

The Russians think we're tryig to escalate a "space weapons" war...

Third rock from the Sun... Life goes on as usual...
__________________
RFB / RSRDC Beta Tester
RFB / RSRDC Modding Forum: http://forum.kickinbak.com/index.php
RFB Top Post link: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=125529
RFB Loadout: RFB_V1.52_102408: RFB_V1.52_Patch_111608: RSRDC_RFBv15_V396
DeepIron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 03:17 PM   #6
AVGWarhawk
Lucky Jack
 
AVGWarhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a 1954 Buick.
Posts: 28,300
Downloads: 90
Uploads: 0


Default

The US wanted to flex some muscle. It worked.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.”
― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road
AVGWarhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 03:41 PM   #7
DeepIron
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Too far from the Pacific right now...
Posts: 1,634
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
The US wanted to flex some muscle. It worked.
Perhaps. But to what advantage? "Don't even think about bullying the US"?

We flexed our muscle with the first Atomic Bomb, then ICBMs, then Blackbirds and U-2 overflights, spy satellites, stealth aircraft, etc...

Does anyone feel any safer?
__________________
RFB / RSRDC Beta Tester
RFB / RSRDC Modding Forum: http://forum.kickinbak.com/index.php
RFB Top Post link: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=125529
RFB Loadout: RFB_V1.52_102408: RFB_V1.52_Patch_111608: RSRDC_RFBv15_V396
DeepIron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 03:49 PM   #8
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
The US wanted to flex some muscle. It worked.
Hardly. Try the cats out of the bag. This was the lesser of two evils in their book. The US would rather keep things secret. They never want to flex their muscle.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 03:53 PM   #9
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepIron
Ironic that the Chinese shot one of their own down a last year and are now belly-aching about the US action...

The Russians think we're tryig to escalate a "space weapons" war...

Third rock from the Sun... Life goes on as usual...
That is funny. The Chinese sat blast includes debris that will be in orbit as a space hazard to sats and shuttles for years to come. When the US did it, all the debris will fall to Earth within a week, which is why they waited so long to take the shot.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-08, 11:43 PM   #10
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Why would it? You'll still deorbit the hazard.
Yeah but isn't the issue over the time it would take for the pieces to fall into the earths atmosphere? Two weeks does sound a lot better than, say 10 years i'd think.
What determines time before descent is mostly orbital stability, not the object's height above ground. By further disrupting orbital stability at high altitude, the drama would have been over a lot sooner.
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.