![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 550
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The Royal Canadian Navy finally after purchasing used british subs,has launched its first torpedoes.
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/07/28...s-us-navy-ship |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Old enough to know better
|
![]()
Great.
We spent a lot of money to fire that torpedo. ![]()
__________________
“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.” ― Arthur C. Clarke ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Go Canada
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
No kidding!
But hey, at least we finally have a sub that can actually do something... been a long time ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
CINC Pacific Fleet
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Markus
__________________
My little lovely female cat |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 550
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
this purchase sure turned into a hell of a deal.....but at least it's showing signs of completion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I wonder why we don't lend/lease an old LA class sub to our friends to the north?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]()
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 550
Downloads: 105
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
at one time,there was a plan to make that happen,but the goverment at the time did not get along with US goverment (and the price tag was a major factor). Also as the article states,the US likes the fact that RCN has D/E boats to test detection tactics.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Old enough to know better
|
![]()
Despite the enormous cost: 750 million to purchase, 3 billion estimated in repairs/ maintenance by 2016, this may still work out. Provided there are no more major screw-ups we will have four D/E subs, two in the Atlantic and two in the Pacific. This will accomplish a couple of things. As captgeo says we can train with USN to hunt D/E subs and this country will continue to have a submarine fleet. Got my fingers crossed.
![]()
__________________
“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.” ― Arthur C. Clarke ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
When they work like they're supposed to, they're very good subs as well. By design, they are still some of the best and most capable diesel-electric subs out there today. I'm all in favour of sticking out with this program to the end - it would be a colossal waste not to use them. Canada still needs something a little more air-independent for covering the Arctic, which is more and more a strategic area, but a working fleet of 4 diesel subs in the two main oceans is a good start.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|