![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
One can only imagine the mess down there...wonderful neighbours
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Posts: 15,272
Downloads: 278
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
And the stench it must have stunk like a slaughter house
![]()
__________________
Never trust the Tories look what Thatcher and Major did in the 80s and 90s and look what the wicked witch May is doing now doing now ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Actually, here in Cleveland, we recently had a serial killer that was hiding bodies in his house. But the meat processor two blocks away kept getting fined for the smell.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ...
__________________
__________________________________________________ __ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Samurai Navy
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Beneath the waves
Posts: 568
Downloads: 20
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I think more people are killed in the drug cartel wars than the war on terror ie Iraq/Afghanistan.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
CINC Pacific Fleet
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Down Under
Posts: 34,688
Downloads: 171
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
This thread stinks!
![]()
__________________
Sub captains go down with their ship! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If you counted just the American/NATO loses yes if you counted all sides and civilians killed by attacks,suicide bombings,and reprisal tribal killings in Iraq and Afghanistan the cartel drug war killings are lower by thousands not to say that there is much violence occurring there.
For the enemy in Iraq the number is around 28,736-37,120 and 113,728 civilians died in Afghanistan Taliban loses can only be guessed at but it is well over 10,000 around 14,700 civilian deaths since 2001. The Mexican drug war the estimate for all sides and civilians is around 54,927 bad indeed but it could be much much worse 54,927 is close to the loses of Americans during the 10 years that they consider the Vietnam War the cartel war on the other hand has only be "hot" since 2006 though they have been fighting each other to some extent since the late 1980's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_...2%80%93present) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War Last edited by Stealhead; 05-13-12 at 06:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]()
Yet another reason for locking down our southern border.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Too late many of the cartels already control turf in the US.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]()
Well just because some water is already in the bilge doesn't mean you shouldn't still plug the leaks in the hull.
The cartels make their money by smuggling humans and drugs across the border. Cut that and they begin to wither.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: May 2004
Location: Aeoteroa
Posts: 7,382
Downloads: 223
Uploads: 1
|
![]()
If I ever win lotto and take a trip round the world I think I will skip Mexico.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 5,421
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You mean what we have to some extent be doing for over 40 years?Seems not to have worked very well thus far post 9/11 they upped the number of Border Patrol by large number that made things much more difficult but they just now use the much harder and more difficult to control routes to smuggle drugs in so long as there is a demand (for drugs and for people wishing to get into the US) the cartels will keep on going seeing as this is their source of income the drugs being the big deal the coyote work is a side deal and also clever way to draw our resources away from pursuing the ones smuggling drugs.
Anything we do now is just about too little too late the cartels already have infiltrated the US a wall will not stop the flow(look at Israel look at East Germany look at Ancient China they all have/had some form of extensive wall border control yet they fail/ed and two of those nations have borders many times smaller than the US ) it might lower it but not stop it they already make use of tunnel networks do ever watch the show Border Wars about the Border Patrol and INS on National Geographic channel? I saw on one episode they followed these two BP agents inside this tunnel that had been found in Arizona after they checked it out and measured its length to the Mexican border (so the concrete guys could fill it) one of the agents told the crew that tunnel filling is such a huge business that there are contractors that only do that type of work they find them every single day how many they do not discover is unknown many that are found are the ones reported by the Mexican police when they find them on the other side so we have to rely on those that are not very reliable to find many. I do not think that the federal government wants to stop fighting the war on drugs any time soon as long as that war is on so will the war and activities of the cartels be active. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||||||
Wayfaring Stranger
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I do think you have a point about demand. However we could be a whole lot more effective than we are currently if we actually got serious about it. Throwing a few extra Border patrol agents and building a partial wall is not being serious. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think the Federal Government doesn't want to stop fighting the WoD because if they did it would mean a big loss of revenue and power hence their half hearted efforts in securing our border and and their constant attempt to block the border states from doing the job themselves.
__________________
![]() Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
3 words: supply and demand.
The so-called "War On Drugs" is just as successfull as the prohibition of alcohol in the US was. With the same side effects: criminalizing citizens for victimless crimes and a rise of the mob. So all efforts in history failed so far to reduce the demand for drugs, what can we do with the supply? Imo legalization/decriminalization is the only effective way. If people do no harm to others only to themself I see no reason to punish them for this. The US can easily provide itself with drugs, no need for imports. This way you'd dry out the Cartel's profits. Yes, they do not only make money from drugs, but the argument that they would switch to other criminal activities is moot, as they do it already. Regarding illegal immigration it should be the other way: With billions of people worldwide living in poverty the supply is virtually endless. So here it could work to hit on the demand. Punish the employers of illegals. The demand for illegals is more or less a luxury demand, it derives from greed and cheapness, as most illegals provide non life-essential services. Can't build a sundeck because US workers are too expensive? Tough crap, maybe wait a year and save some pennies to afford it! If there are not enough qualified people there is still the option to give out work visas. This way the foreign workers also have the advantage of being protected by work and wage laws. About the efficiency of the wall, here are some official numbers by the Stasi regarding the German border, for the years 76-85: http://www.chronik-der-mauer.de/inde.../file/id/44085 The first column is relevant, these are the successfull attempts (gelungene Fluichtversuche). 600-900 people per year seems pretty effective. But does the US really want its Southern border to look like this? ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Der Alte
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 3,316
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So is it the citizens (USA) fault for liking dope. The Mexicans love to blame us.
Or the fact that most the Mexican cops can be bribed? I got pulled over for being a gringo, in my younger days, it cost me 50 USD to not be arrested for being white. The cop asked me in English for "a taste to go away" (late teen expedition to Tiajuana) And that was in a tourist area, 10-15 years ago, before all the cartel crap was in the forefront. So don't go there. St. Thomas is better, I was there a few months ago, wonderful, and the natives don't hate you for your skin color, or ethnicity. (or try to scam and rob you) EDIT: Pretty pic of the Berlin wall Penguin. Great Idea, except you Germans (soviets) didn't have enough artillery and mortars, too few landmines. Mexicans are more crafty than east Germans. ![]()
__________________
If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons. -Winston Churchill- The most fascinating man in the world. Last edited by soopaman2; 05-14-12 at 07:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|