![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 279
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hi all!
Im gonna visit my girlfriend soon, and she only has one of those netbooks. The relevant specs are: Intel Atom 1.6Ghz 2 GB RAM 160GB HDD Intel GMA 950 integrated graphics <---- thats probably the bottleneck So has anyone got any experience with running SH3 on netbooks with similar specs.
__________________
E8400 @ 4.00Ghz standard vCore, Gigabyte P35C DS3R @ 445 Mhz, Leadtek GTX 280, 3 x 1GB Kingston DDR2 800 @ 890Mhz, 250GB +160GB HDD, Terratec DMX 6fire 24/96, Silverstone ST60F 600W, Logitech Z-5500 THX ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Bosun
![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Italy
Posts: 62
Downloads: 87
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]()
__________________
SH3 1.4b-STEAM GWX3 ** SH3commander 3.2 ** historical settings SH4 1.5-STEAM TMO2.2 ** RSRD campaign ** SCAF ** MaxOptics ** realistic settings SH5 vanilla win8.1 i7-950//780ti//32Gb |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dry docks of Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 250
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You're visiting your girlfriend and you're thinking about playing on the netbook? Shouldn't you be playing with something else during shore leave?
![]() BP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Same thought here. Sounds like you live apart most of the time and you wants to play SH when you do have time together. In my experience that is not a wise thing to do. Wanting to be a sub captain (or play whatever games) while being on the love boat makes the other half nervous about what your intentions are. It makes her think she'll get torpedo-ed in the end. But in the negative way.
__________________
My site downloads: https://ricojansen.nl/downloads |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Sparky
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Downloads: 31
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
when my gf was sleeping I used to play RE3 on her room lol
![]() about the specs of the nootebook It will run, I have almost the same stuff except for Dual core @ 1.5 ghz and Intel mobile 965 graphics, I have the water reflections....but they are stuck in the left corner of my screen ![]() ![]()
__________________
Current Careers: U-177 Type IXD2, 10th Flotilla March 13, 1943 U-3502 Type XXI, 7th/13th Flotilla April 14, 1942 100% realism, GWX 3.0, SH3 Commander 3.2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rotterdam - The Netherlands
Posts: 514
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 7
|
![]() Quote:
1) I have a MacBook Pro 15" 2.53 Ghz + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT. 2) I have a MacBook 13" (white one) with Intel GMA. On (1) it runs smoothly with GWX 3.0. ![]() On (2) you can run SH3, but without GWX 3.0 or LSH3 v4. On both machines I use boot camp (from Apple) and run Windows XP Professional. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Mate
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 54
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm seriously interested in running SH3 on my netbook, but I have a problem. When I found out I can legally remove StarForce driver to make it compatible for Windows 7 I did so, but now I have have another error message. A window pops up saying, "Can not initialize 3D engine". Damn. Anyone have a solution?
Acer Aspire one computer netbook. I doubt there will be a performance problem, it always ran fine on my desktop with lower specs than the netbook. I'm currently switching everything over to my netbook, im running SH1 and SH2 on my netbook so far. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 367
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I ran it on a dell latitude 630 for a while. worked really well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_Latitude |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Prince of
the Sea
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Watching over U-253
Posts: 3,527
Downloads: 98
Uploads: 2
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=78827 It's got a whole bunch of ideas you can try. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|