![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 308
Downloads: 724
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
HI all,
![]() Is there anybody here who know why SH3's mission loading time is dramatically much longer than SH4, which have much more 3D graphics data to load than SH3 ? Regards
__________________
![]() Last edited by arnahud2; 10-23-10 at 05:19 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
SH3 has to load every ship and every plane that can appear during the entire war. Loading times go up with a mod like GWX because it adds a much larger number of ships.
SH4 was specifically designed to fix that problem. It only loads the 6-month period surrounding the start date. This leads to people who only refit and never end the patrol suddenly complaining that there are no more targets.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: U-142
Posts: 624
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So which do you think is better?
__________________
![]() Support U-Boot_HAHD: Install Dropbox Click Here & Increase The Teams Dropbox space and get 2.25GB of free online Storage space for yourself. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CATALINA IS. SO . CAL USA
Posts: 10,108
Downloads: 511
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Both. Why do these posts continually want peeps to choose?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
Oh, I think SH4 definitely is better.
For loading times. ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: U-142
Posts: 624
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() Support U-Boot_HAHD: Install Dropbox Click Here & Increase The Teams Dropbox space and get 2.25GB of free online Storage space for yourself. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
SH4 is faster but you don't get time to brew up a nice hot cuppa, unlike SH3 and open a box of jaffa cakes as well.
![]()
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 308
Downloads: 724
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Regards
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Argentinian Skipper
|
![]()
If you want a subsim with realistic approach, immersivity and great mods, SH3 (with GWX), is the best subsim ever.
If you like a more "Hollywood" approach, and you think in yourself as Cary Grant in "Tokyo Destiny" or "Operation petticoat" (without the women), the SH4 PTO is your sim. SH4 is a very good sim (with mods - TMO- RFB- RSRDC), and I play it, but SH3 GWX is...better. For SH4 - ATO Operation Monsun - good mod, but with some bugs - SH3 is more immersive and realistic. And for times of charge: My SH3 with all the mods, I obtain 30-35 FPS; with SH4 TMO RSRDC, 60 FPS sinchronized... I think and think about the realistics environments of SH3 and SH4. Is SH4 more realistic? Uhmmm...The atmosfere is more realistic than SH3, but the waves in SH4 TMO aren´t realistic at all. And the ports and bases are poor in comparission with that in SH3 GWX (and more in LSH3V5). And - over all - is the "magic feeling" of play SH3 - more an adventure than the professional navy career of SH4). Regarding SH5: comic heroes, FPS drops drops, only a sub, poor immersivity...I bought SH5, installed, played a campaign and uninistalled. Quickly return to SH3 (I love this game...). Regards. Fitzcarraldo ![]()
__________________
My subject is War, and the pity of War. The Poetry is in the pity - Wilfred Owen. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|