SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-09, 05:42 AM   #1
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,602
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default Al Qaeda says would use Pakistani nuclear weapons

http://alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LL556282.htm

Pakistan has around 60 nuclear weapons which are believed to be stored with the nuclear heads and the conventional explosives igniting them stored separately in an unassembled state, with carrier systems also located separate. The military control and security system has been upgraded after 2001, with the proliferation desaster of 2004 putting the efficency of that into question again.

Related:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...r-weapons.html

Quote:
Pakistani officials have continued to rebuff American requests for more details about the location and security of the country's nuclear sites, the report noted.
Some of the Pakistani reluctance stemmed from long-standing concern that the United States might be tempted to seize or destroy Pakistan's arsenal if the insurgency spread further, according to the paper.
Clever little bastards!


http://abcnews.go.com/International/...7605181&page=1

Quote:
"The student body has become very conservative, very Islamist, their outward appearance has changed," says Professor Hoodbhoy, the chair of the physics department at Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad. "It's row after row of these burqa women."
Students avoid talking politics with Hoodbhoy, a cautionary voice on nuclear weapons in a nation that takes boisterous pride in having them. "They think I'm on the wrong side," he says.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL34248.pdf



Conclusion: it is an utmost priority to find out the storage site(s) of the nuclear components of Pakistan'S nuclear weapon arsenal, and to prepare options to destroy these quickly if a state of emergency arises. since diplomcy certainly is unfit to gain this information, infiltration seems to be the option of choice. Success nevertheless is uncertain, but we cannot afford to ignore the need to gain this knowledge about location of sites.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

Last edited by Skybird; 06-22-09 at 05:53 AM.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-09, 09:02 AM   #2
Max2147
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 714
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I'm sure the US already has plenty of people over there. The ISI isn't exactly difficult to infiltrate.
Max2147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-09, 09:09 AM   #3
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 190,461
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Al Qaeda says would use Pakistani nuclear weapons


I've little doubt they would, so all the more reason for finding out where the ordnance is hid.

I'd be more concerned about the Pakistanis giving them one
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.