![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 359
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The type IX and the type VII have different caliber deck guns. My experiences are that they are pretty much the same. Are they?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
it depends if your referring to them in RL terms or gaming terms.
In RL the VII was 88mm and the IX was 105mm. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
10.5cm/45 SK C/32
Shell weight: 15.1kg Firing charge: 4.08kg Burster charge: 3.8kg MV: 780m/s Range: 15,175m (not that they could hit anything outside of about 1/4 of that) 8.8cm/45 SK C/35 Shell weight: 9kg Firing charge: 2.1kg Burster charge: Unknown, but a lot smaller than the 10.5cm MV: 700m/s Range: 11,950m (with same caveat as above) http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_Main.htm As you can see, the Type IX's deck gun has a heavier shell, so it carries more momentum; a larger firing charge, so it leaves the gun faster, both of which combine to give it a longer range. The shell weighs more so it does more damage even if it doesn't explode, and a larger burster charge so it does more damage when it does explode. But, as Jim said, none of that real-world stuff means a thing if it isn't programmed into the game. I don't know if it is or not.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Docked on a Russian pond
Posts: 7,072
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Gamewise, I find that the 88 will sink more ships with the ammo provided than the 105
__________________
Espionage, adventure, suspense, are just a click away Click here to look inside Brag's book: Amazon.com: Kingmaker: Alexey Braguine: Books Order Kingmaker here: http://www.subsim.com/store.html For Tactics visit:http://www.freewebs.com/kielman/ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|