![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Czech Republic, Prague, coordinates are sumthin like 50,10 North 14,25 East, not much accurate
Posts: 132
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hello... once again i have for some while two computers at my disposal, so i decided to try some things in DW on my "LAN"
![]() ![]() It might not be all 100% accurate, because DW is really very complex, and thus its hard to accuratelly test al lthe ascpects, but it should give the general idea ![]() This time it was MH60 versus Chinese Kilo Improved... the helicopter trying to find the submarine at different depths, speeds and other circumstances, using different sensors... so, lets start!!! ![]() ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First test was Kilo detectability againts radar. Kilo was visible on radar when at 14-15 meters, diving to 15-16 meters resulted in kilo being undetectable on the radar. Raising any masts while being at 15-16 meters depth had no effect on its detctability by radar. Getting very close to the kilo did not detected the masts too. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ And now kilo versus sonar ![]() This was the lookout on the beginning ![]() The kilo is about 3,5 miles from our helo, running at 5 knots at 15 meters depth. There are two DICASS buoys next to the helo, one DEEP and one SHALLOW. Both ACTIVE - The DEEP one was able to see the kilo pretty well, while the SHALLOW one was unable to see it at all. The layer was at a 230 meters so it seems a bit strange to me. It was surface duct. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Then i tried passive detection, and diesel noise ![]() Ok, on those two pictures of passive DICASS and passive dipping sonar, you can see, that you can not see the Kilo at 3,5 miles range, 5 knots at 15 meters depth. :P ![]() ![]() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ok, that was somewhat expected....but lets see what happens if the kilo engages one of its diesels :hmm: ![]() ![]() Now we can see you, boy ![]() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So what now, will engaging of the 2nd diesel have any more effect???? ![]() ![]() ![]() Wow! it definitely does! A big time! ![]() ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now lets disengage diesels, dive the ship to 100 meters and start running at 15 knots! This tells us a bit about difference in active return in relation to distance to the sub. ![]() ![]() So lets go passive now...the kilo, even at 15 knots, is one sneaky bastard! ![]() ![]() ![]() But still at this range, buoys get no reading and no frequency alert ![]() ![]() But the dipping sonar hears something! But well...it is a very very faint line, i would probably not notice it not knowing where the sub is ![]() ![]() So....let it come just a bit closer! ![]() At a distance of about 350 yards, plus about 200 yards (because my helo drifted in wind) from the buoys, i have at last got a frequency alert and my deep VLAD and only my deep VLAD showed me a nice faint line. ![]() In the next few seconds the deep VLAD developed a second faint line, but that was the best it done, when the kilo came too close to the buoy, the contact was lost. ![]() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ And now active detection in relation to depth! Kilo at 150 meters... ![]() At 200 meters...... ![]() At 200 and 50 meters............... ![]() Now at 300 meters, there appeared some strange ghost contact! ![]() ![]() ![]() And at 350 meters, the kilo imploded ![]() ![]() -------------------------------- Now that is all.... interesting? :hmm: ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|