![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 368
Downloads: 68
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm playing with GWX and OLC (not sure if this makes a difference to my question) and notice plotting on the surface is very simple. I ask the office on deck to give nearest visual target. He gives bearing AND range. If I do this again ten minutes later, I can now plot heading, and calculate speed.
When I'm submerged, I have more or less the same view through the scope. Yet there's no way to get range information, as on the surface. 2 Questions... a) Is there an error margin built into the officer on decks range estimation? b) Should it be possible to get range information from an officer when looking through the scope or should we disable his ability to range when surfaced?
__________________
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit, Intel Core i7-2760QM @ 2.40GHz, 8GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6990M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,788
Downloads: 405
Uploads: 29
|
![]()
There is no error in his estimate. It is absolutely spot on.
There is a way of disabling his range estimate so that he only calls out the bearing to the nearest contact. A lot of the GUI mods do this. It involves editing a line in Data/Menu/en_menu.txt, but I can't find the entry to be edited at the moment. I'll keep looking. Hopefully someone will be along in a minute to enlighten us ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,788
Downloads: 405
Uploads: 29
|
![]()
Found it!
Entry 4616 Change from: 4616=Nearest visual contact at bearing %03.0f, range %.0f meters! To: 4616=Nearest visual contact at bearing %03.0f! That way your WO will only give you the bearing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 368
Downloads: 68
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You're a gentleman. Thank you.
__________________
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit, Intel Core i7-2760QM @ 2.40GHz, 8GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6990M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: AN9771
Posts: 4,904
Downloads: 304
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The only 'error' in his reporting is that it is rounded to 100 meters. But other than that it's spot on. Too spot on to be realistic. Exploit? Perhaps, depends on personal limmitations.
But why is it 'wrong' for him to give range when on the surface?
__________________
My site downloads: https://ricojansen.nl/downloads |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 368
Downloads: 68
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
There's nothing 'wrong' with it. Apart from, you get the information too quickly and too accurately.
__________________
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit, Intel Core i7-2760QM @ 2.40GHz, 8GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6990M |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|