National socialism

[Skybird]

https://mises.org/wire/yes-nazis-were-socialists



I got occassionally some Flak by people when I said in the past on a few occasions the Nazis were socialists, Goebbels agitated against the posessing class already in the early 30s, and that Hitler still in February 1944 or 1945 (I forgot) insisted in an adress to the NSDAP on that there were not principle differences between Bolshewism and National Socialism. I have at least twice posted some dedicated (libertarian) essays on proving this by referring to the structure of the German economy and state communal organisation itself. Here now is just a rnadom find of another essay supporting this view.

Its maybe the bioggest propaganda coup of history that the commies/reds(/sovjets managed to depict them as kind of the natural antidot to Fascism, whereas the truth is that difefrences in t eh horror of state terror and planned economies in both Hitler's Germany and Stlain USSR were not really different. Not even the racism and antismetism was especialylm unique, but shared in Russia (even Poland, England), as well, the Nazis just pushed the destructive consequences of it to before unseen systematization and perfection, turning genocide's and mass killing's qualitative dimension into an industrial format. The mass killing committed by Stalin, on a quanitative scale absolutely compares, so does that of many others.

Thats all why I tend to count the death numbers from the Nazis' terror as contributing to the total numbers of all global socialist terrors and desasters of the past 100+ years.

[Jimbuna]

An often used Brit saying "Birds of a feather, flock together"

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Skybird

I got occassionally some Flak by people when I said in the past on a few occasions the Nazis were socialists

And you will continue to get flak for idiotic claims.

[Cajun Kaleun]

https://timeghost.tv/national-social...wing-ideology/

Also using Mises is hilarious that dumbass called his own disciples socialists if they dared disagree with him. The man was a tool.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Dowly

And you will continue to get flak for idiotic claims.

No, I don't, because it is so way off target that it misses all the time. I must not even try to dodge it. A stream of bullets - all duds.



But your attitude explains why people over and over and over again fall for the same old demons and applaude them, may they be called autocrats, may they be called socialists.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by Jimbuna

An often used Brit saying "Birds of a feather, flock together"

Twin brothers of the same parent, I would describe it as. They may wear different clothes, but in only bathing shorts they would look identical and you would not be able to say who is who.

[Rockstar]

Skimmed from a national socialist movement website.

IDEOLOGY. The * is totally committed to the National Socialist worldview. National Socialism is concerned with what is best for our own people as a collective unit. This distinguishes it from Marxist socialism, which instead seeks to divide the population, improving conditions for a single societal group at the cost of another.

Sounds like socialist left wing fascism too me.

[August]

nazis and commies are just two halves of the same tainted authoritarian coin. Socialism in any form is like a societal acid. Highly diluted and limited bits of it can be used here and there (with continual difficulty) but overall it's a corrosive political theory that will always end up eventually destroying the society that adopts too much of it.

[Bilge_Rat]

This is a fairly silly thread. The Nazis were not "socialists", they were "anti-socialists" as anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of German history would know.

The name "socialist worker's party" pre-dates Hitler joining the party. Hitler joined because the party wanted to avenge the humiliation of the Versailles treaty. He had no interest in left wing policies, he kept them when he became leader because it would be useful to gain power and to placate the left-wing of the party under ernst Rohm who controlled the SA.

Once Hitler gained power in 1933, Rohm actually wanted to implement "socialist" policies, namely nationalising big businesses, breaking up large landed estates and turning the German Army into a revolutionary force controlled by the SA. Big Business and the Army was aghast, but Hitler had no intention of following Rohm, instead Rohm was killed in 1934 and the entire left-wing was killed, jailed or thrown out of the Party.

After that, the Nazis became a very pro-business, anti-labour party, labor unions and strikes were outlawed, and worker protections were curtailed. Nazi economic policies were very pro-business and big businesses were garanteed huge profits by the Nazis re-armament policies.

-----

On the second point, again many historians have looked at this and there is no contest, in terms of men, women and children executed, liquidated, massacred or who died as a result of direct policies which were reasonably certain to cause their deaths, the Germans in twelve years between 1933-45 murdered around 3 or 4 times as many as the Russians managed to kill in thirty six years between 1917 and 1953 under Lenin and Stalin.

deaths under Hitler: around 12 million
deaths under Lenin and Stalin: between 3-4 million

[Skybird]

Sigh.

https://mises.org/library/why-nazism...m-totalitarian

https://mises.org/library/origins-nazism


I don't care that people do not like the source, or do not like von Mises. The man has the better arguments, and that is what counts. Neither the left nor the right likes von Mises and the school of Austrioans or libertarianism, because both "conservatives" as well as "socialists" know all too well that their rigging of politics and eocnomics cannot reahc and corrupot them and turn them into accomplices of riugged potlics as wre today have themn. And this neither the left nor the right will ever forgive libertarians. There is a reaosn why people prefering liberty and freedom are beign opursued by both right AND left regimes, and get dmeinsied by the crowds of both sides.



And that also is why some of you are sao allergic oin b eing rmeinded on that there is no principle difference between brown-red socialism and blood-red socialism.



To me, they are twin brothers of the same ancestry. Thats why they look so very much the same, and do so very much the same kind of violence and brutality, totalitarian centralism and planned life/living/actin and absolute control of all elvels of individual and communal life.

[ The basic work of von Mises where he described the fundaments of Austrian economics, is called "Human Action", because that is the one and only thing that all life and craving is about: what motivates us to do what kind of things: our acting. This and only this must be at the basis of any economic theory worth to be called that: a theory of economics. Von Mises understood this perfectly. But almost nobody understands that today: thats why the world today is economically and ecologically and financially standing where it stands. And where it stands, that is dangeorus grounds, to put it mildly ].

[mapuc]

I don't care whether they are left or right. Some of my friends say they are left and I mistake they say this because of the word sozialistische is a part the parties title.

I have read so much about this party, I've seen historian claim they were right wing and some other historian, who claim they belonged to the left.

What can be said about this party...it was a threat to the human race, which is enough for me.

Markus

[Rockstar]

Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat

This is a fairly silly thread. The Nazis were not "socialists", they were "anti-socialists" as anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of German history would know.

The name "socialist worker's party" pre-dates Hitler joining the party. Hitler joined because the party wanted to avenge the humiliation of the Versailles treaty. He had no interest in left wing policies, he kept them when he became leader because it would be useful to gain power and to placate the left-wing of the party under ernst Rohm who controlled the SA.

Once Hitler gained power in 1933, Rohm actually wanted to implement "socialist" policies, namely nationalising big businesses, breaking up large landed estates and turning the German Army into a revolutionary force controlled by the SA. Big Business and the Army was aghast, but Hitler had no intention of following Rohm, instead Rohm was killed in 1934 and the entire left-wing was killed, jailed or thrown out of the Party.

After that, the Nazis became a very pro-business, anti-labour party, labor unions and strikes were outlawed, and worker protections were curtailed. Nazi economic policies were very pro-business and big businesses were garanteed huge profits by the Nazis re-armament policies.

-----

On the second point, again many historians have looked at this and there is no contest, in terms of men, women and children executed, liquidated, massacred or who died as a result of direct policies which were reasonably certain to cause their deaths, the Germans in twelve years between 1933-45 murdered around 3 or 4 times as many as the Russians managed to kill in thirty six years between 1917 and 1953 under Lenin and Stalin.

deaths under Hitler: around 12 million
deaths under Lenin and Stalin: between 3-4 million

The quote I posted earlier came from a modern day national socialist website and even they understand the ideology as something socialist in nature. However just because some take for instance people like Bernie or even Catfish may lean towards socialism or socialist ideals does not make them a bad person or a nazi.

What Is National Socialism?
Leon Trotsky
Written in exile in Turkey, June 10, 1933.
Translated from Russian and from German.
Appeared in several versions in various journals, first being The Modern Thinker, October 1933.
Last two paragraphs added as postscript November 2, 1933.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/tro...933/330610.htm

[August]

Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat

deaths under Lenin and Stalin: between 3-4 million

Even if you can believe those estimates (I think it's more like 20-25 million) Lenin and Stalin didn't run the worlds only communist government. Estimates of total mass killings by ALL Communist regimes range as high as 160 million. If you want to accurately compare the relative dangers of two murderous ideologies then you should compare them equally.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_k...munist_regimes


At some point though the degree of deadliness becomes academic. I see no real difference at all between 1 or 10 million victims. Both numbers are completely terrible to contemplate.

[Bilge_Rat]

Of those deported or arrested for political reasons from 1921 onwards, the number
of deaths about which we have more or less reliable information seems to have been
about 3–3.5 million, of which about 1 million were shootings, 1–1.5 million deaths
of deportees (see note 60) and perhaps 1 million deaths of prisoners.

source: Michael Ellman, "Soviet Repression Statistics: Some Comments", Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 54, no. 7, 2002, pp1151-1172

http://sovietinfo.tripod.com/ELM-Rep...Statistics.pdf

very good overview of all available sources.

Problem with a lot of estimates is that they lump in all deaths, not just victims of actual repression, but deaths from illness, famine as a result of social/economic policies, work accidents, deaths from wars, etc., all of which is fine if you are trying to figure out the total human cost of communism, but does not help if you are trying to compare the actual victims of the Nazis versus the Bolsheviks.

The other problem is that figures were overblown for Cold War propaganda purposes. During the Cold War, the U.S. was making the argument that the Commies were pure evil. Problem was, one of their key ally, Germany, was still being run by former Nazis who held many key posts in government, military and business until the mid-late 70s. So there was pressure to inflate the number of victims under Stalin so the West could say that "Yes the Nazis were bad, but the Commies are worse".

In fact, there is no comparaison, we have a pretty good idea of the total number the Germans murdered in 1933-45. The number is around 12 million, including 6 million jews and 2.5 million soviet POWs in 41-42. By contrast, the total number that the Soviets murdered in 1921-53 is around 3.5 million.

The Russian Commies were ruthless, but there was a political logic to their killings. The Germans under Hitler were just barbarians who killed entire populations for no valid reason.