Obamas green Energy plan is not very popular

mapuc · 08-03-15, 06:32 PM

Have seen a lot about his plan for the futur energy in USA

From what I have read so far-Obamas plan seem to be not so popular.

I choose not to post links-There are links who are for and there's a link who's against it.

Markus

ikalugin · 08-03-15, 07:35 PM

I wonder what the plan entails.

Jeff-Groves · 08-03-15, 07:48 PM

FEMA Camps that burn bodies to produce energy for the rich.

Stealhead · 08-03-15, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikalugin

I wonder what the plan entails.

https://www.google.com/search?redir_...=1438652286547

Oberon · 08-03-15, 08:57 PM

Of course it's not popular, Obama did it.

razark · 08-03-15, 09:40 PM

Obama's <insert anything here> plan is not very popular.

Betonov · 08-04-15, 01:54 AM

I don't like green energy plans.
They are based on popular opinion and not data.

Catfish · 08-04-15, 07:24 AM

^ Of course, no scientific study is based on proper data – today.
Because those lobbies are everywhere, and a sample of 20 test subjects becomes statistically significant, in those 'studies'.

Also, as long as you outsource the last mineral and oil from the ground with the grossest methods, polluting everything and make the whole country look like a poisonous radioactive swamp, you will have the full support of the people. Or so it seems

But then, medieval viewpoints die hard.

Jimbuna · 08-04-15, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betonov

I don't like green energy plans.
They are based on popular opinion and not data.

Trying to avoid Soylent Green I should imagine

Betonov · 08-04-15, 08:45 AM

There's a scientific way to have a green energy economy and we would already made progress on it.
But point scoring with the uninformed public is a great way to get re-elected and most of todays ''ecologists'' are about as uninformed as the die hard traditionalists.

Oberon · 08-04-15, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betonov

There's a scientific way to have a green energy economy and we would already made progress on it.
But point scoring with the uninformed public is a great way to get re-elected and most of todays ''ecologists'' are about as uninformed as the die hard traditionalists.

It's persuading companies to continue making progress on it that's key, I mean cutting carbon emissions is a valiant endeavour I think, and really the main opponents are those in industries that produce heavy amounts of CO2, such as coal power stations and the like.

Of course, I think that governments should start putting money towards preparing for what's coming in terms of climate change and sea level rises. Because it's not going to be pretty and it's going to cost a lot of money on a regular basis.

ikalugin · 08-04-15, 11:31 AM

Well I mean, with the nuclear power problems US appears to have it is either more fossil fuels or going green.

mapuc · 08-04-15, 12:36 PM

Thank you for your reply.

I had hope for a positive or a negative answer about Obama´s green energy plan.

I know there are those Americans who dislike Obama and therefor dislike every idea he comes up with and they do this by automatic

There must be some who aren't against Obama, but have the knowledge about this green energy and current energy in USA

And can give a positive or a negative answer.

Markus

STEED · 08-04-15, 12:56 PM

I'm pro Nuclear Power in your face Cameron and Co.

ikalugin · 08-04-15, 01:36 PM

And how is nuclear power working out in UK?

08-03-15, 06:32 PM	#1
mapuc CINC Pacific Fleet Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 20,537 Downloads: 37 Uploads: 0	Obamas green Energy plan is not very popular Have seen a lot about his plan for the futur energy in USA From what I have read so far-Obamas plan seem to be not so popular. I choose not to post links-There are links who are for and there's a link who's against it. Markus

08-03-15, 07:35 PM	#2
ikalugin Ocean Warrior Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 3,212 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 0	I wonder what the plan entails. __________________ Grumpy as always.

08-03-15, 09:40 PM	#6
razark Ocean Warrior Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 2,731 Downloads: 393 Uploads: 12	Obama's <insert anything here> plan is not very popular. __________________ "Never ask a World War II history buff for a 'final solution' to your problem!"

08-04-15, 07:24 AM	#8
Catfish Dipped Squirrel Operative Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky Posts: 17,766 Downloads: 38 Uploads: 0	^ Of course, no scientific study is based on proper data – today. Because those lobbies are everywhere, and a sample of 20 test subjects becomes statistically significant, in those 'studies'. Also, as long as you outsource the last mineral and oil from the ground with the grossest methods, polluting everything and make the whole country look like a poisonous radioactive swamp, you will have the full support of the people. Or so it seems But then, medieval viewpoints die hard. __________________ >^..^<)))>{ All generalizations are wrong. Last edited by Catfish; 08-04-15 at 07:32 AM.*

08-04-15, 11:31 AM	#12
ikalugin Ocean Warrior Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 3,212 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 0	Well I mean, with the nuclear power problems US appears to have it is either more fossil fuels or going green. __________________ Grumpy as always.

08-03-15, 07:48 PM	#3
Jeff-Groves GLOBAL MODDING TERRORIST Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 5,651 Downloads: 137 Uploads: 0	FEMA Camps that burn bodies to produce energy for the rich.

08-03-15, 08:57 PM	#5
Oberon Lucky Jack Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 25,976 Downloads: 61 Uploads: 20	Of course it's not popular, Obama did it.

08-04-15, 01:54 AM	#7
Betonov Navy Seal Join Date: May 2009 Location: Slovenia Posts: 8,647 Downloads: 26 Uploads: 0	I don't like green energy plans. They are based on popular opinion and not data.

08-04-15, 08:45 AM	#10
Betonov Navy Seal Join Date: May 2009 Location: Slovenia Posts: 8,647 Downloads: 26 Uploads: 0	There's a scientific way to have a green energy economy and we would already made progress on it. But point scoring with the uninformed public is a great way to get re-elected and most of todays ''ecologists'' are about as uninformed as the die hard traditionalists.

08-04-15, 12:36 PM	#13
mapuc CINC Pacific Fleet Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 20,537 Downloads: 37 Uploads: 0	Thank you for your reply. I had hope for a positive or a negative answer about Obama´s green energy plan. I know there are those Americans who dislike Obama and therefor dislike every idea he comes up with and they do this by automatic There must be some who aren't against Obama, but have the knowledge about this green energy and current energy in USA And can give a positive or a negative answer. Markus

08-04-15, 12:56 PM	#14
STEED Lucky Jack Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Down Town UK Posts: 27,695 Downloads: 89 Uploads: 48	I'm pro Nuclear Power in your face Cameron and Co. __________________ Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT!

08-04-15, 01:36 PM	#15
ikalugin Ocean Warrior Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 3,212 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 0	And how is nuclear power working out in UK? __________________ Grumpy as always.