SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Obamas green Energy plan is not very popular (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=221332)

mapuc 08-03-15 06:32 PM

Obamas green Energy plan is not very popular
 
Have seen a lot about his plan for the futur energy in USA

From what I have read so far-Obamas plan seem to be not so popular.

I choose not to post links-There are links who are for and there's a link who's against it.

Markus

ikalugin 08-03-15 07:35 PM

I wonder what the plan entails.

Jeff-Groves 08-03-15 07:48 PM

FEMA Camps that burn bodies to produce energy for the rich.
:har:

Stealhead 08-03-15 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikalugin (Post 2333641)
I wonder what the plan entails.

https://www.google.com/search?redir_...=1438652286547

Oberon 08-03-15 08:57 PM

Of course it's not popular, Obama did it. :O:

razark 08-03-15 09:40 PM

Obama's <insert anything here> plan is not very popular.

Betonov 08-04-15 01:54 AM

I don't like green energy plans.
They are based on popular opinion and not data.

Catfish 08-04-15 07:24 AM

^ Of course, no scientific study is based on proper data – today.
Because those lobbies are everywhere, and a sample of 20 test subjects becomes statistically significant, in those 'studies'.

Also, as long as you outsource the last mineral and oil from the ground with the grossest methods, polluting everything and make the whole country look like a poisonous radioactive swamp, you will have the full support of the people. Or so it seems :03:

But then, medieval viewpoints die hard.

Jimbuna 08-04-15 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betonov (Post 2333691)
I don't like green energy plans.
They are based on popular opinion and not data.

Trying to avoid Soylent Green I should imagine :03:

Betonov 08-04-15 08:45 AM

There's a scientific way to have a green energy economy and we would already made progress on it.
But point scoring with the uninformed public is a great way to get re-elected and most of todays ''ecologists'' are about as uninformed as the die hard traditionalists.

Oberon 08-04-15 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betonov (Post 2333750)
There's a scientific way to have a green energy economy and we would already made progress on it.
But point scoring with the uninformed public is a great way to get re-elected and most of todays ''ecologists'' are about as uninformed as the die hard traditionalists.

It's persuading companies to continue making progress on it that's key, I mean cutting carbon emissions is a valiant endeavour I think, and really the main opponents are those in industries that produce heavy amounts of CO2, such as coal power stations and the like.

Of course, I think that governments should start putting money towards preparing for what's coming in terms of climate change and sea level rises. Because it's not going to be pretty and it's going to cost a lot of money on a regular basis.

ikalugin 08-04-15 11:31 AM

Well I mean, with the nuclear power problems US appears to have it is either more fossil fuels or going green.

mapuc 08-04-15 12:36 PM

Thank you for your reply.

I had hope for a positive or a negative answer about Obama´s green energy plan.

I know there are those Americans who dislike Obama and therefor dislike every idea he comes up with and they do this by automatic

There must be some who aren't against Obama, but have the knowledge about this green energy and current energy in USA

And can give a positive or a negative answer.

Markus

STEED 08-04-15 12:56 PM

I'm pro Nuclear Power in your face Cameron and Co. :O:

ikalugin 08-04-15 01:36 PM

And how is nuclear power working out in UK?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.