SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-10, 07:52 PM   #1
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 7,100
Downloads: 605
Uploads: 44


Default Another Falklands war?

Looks like another war in the Falklands is brewing, Argentina is showing it's arse again.Some countries never learn.......

Thoughts?
Bubblehead1980 is online   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-10, 09:08 PM   #2
Blackhawk1006
Watch
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 22
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

It's just because of the British Oil Drilling that will be happening there next week.

I can hardly see another war happening there though, remember that in 1982 Argentina was run by a Militarist Government, unlike today.
__________________
Blackhawk1006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-10, 09:32 PM   #3
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,197
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

It doesn't take a military government to start a war though.

Hopefully Britain will take it as a sign that she needs to maintain the military strength necessary to defend her possessions if she wishes to keep them.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-10, 10:05 PM   #4
ReFaN
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 831
Downloads: 101
Uploads: 0
Default

Drop the bomb on them!
__________________



Liverpool is my relegion, Anfield is my church. True believers never walk alone.
ReFaN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-10, 10:25 PM   #5
Bubblehead1980
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 7,100
Downloads: 605
Uploads: 44


Default

Blackhawk, LOL @ the Conan, Colbert, Stewart thing, ahh that was good times.

True Argentina is not ran by a military govt anymore BUT they are pushing Britain again.

Agreed that maybe the Brit govt will see it as sign they should not cut defense budget.
Bubblehead1980 is online   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-10, 11:19 PM   #6
Diopos
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Athens, the original one.
Posts: 1,226
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Second war? Don't know...
But at least know we know what the first one was probably all about ...







,
__________________
- Oh God! They're all over the place! CRASH DIVE!!!
- Ehm... we can't honey. We're in the car right now.
- What?... er right... Doesn't matter! We'll give it a try anyway!
Diopos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 12:05 AM   #7
Highbury
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 51.557, -0.102
Posts: 1,311
Downloads: 177
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
It doesn't take a military government to start a war though.

Hopefully Britain will take it as a sign that she needs to maintain the military strength necessary to defend her possessions if she wishes to keep them.
Very true, but at the time the Argentine invasion was a gamble by a newly placed regime to divert attention from internal problems, and give a reason for national pride. In '82 even the US Navy said it would be impossible for the UK to take the Falklands back by force and the Argentinians believed it themselves, and bet on it. (The RN had very little sea-based air power at the time) I would say Argentina now knows this in not the case. I would be very surprised if they took military action again.

On your second point, I do agree fully. If I didn't my first point would be useless.
Highbury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 12:32 AM   #8
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

A couple of subs with some tomohawk missles would make it a bad day if they tried to take the islands.
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 01:45 AM   #9
diver
Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 213
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highbury View Post
In '82 even the US Navy said it would be impossible for the UK to take the Falklands back by force and the Argentinians believed it themselves, and bet on it. (The RN had very little sea-based air power at the time) I would say Argentina now knows this in not the case. I would be very surprised if they took military action again.
I'd argue strongly that they have even less Sea-based Air Power now.
diver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 02:00 AM   #10
Highbury
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 51.557, -0.102
Posts: 1,311
Downloads: 177
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diver View Post
I'd argue strongly that they have even less Sea-based Air Power now.
That could be true, I don't know what the RN has now. In '82 they had 34 Harriers.

Unfortunately for the Argentinians, and not considered in the 1982 US Navy report, was the airbase the British set up on Ascension Island two weeks after the invasion, which they used for Vulcans and their tankers. In the modern era such land based planes would be devastating to Argentine technology.

I just don't think they could beat the UK and I think they would be less motivated, and better informed this time around, so won't even try it. Of course as with any speculation on future events, I could be dead wrong.
Highbury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 04:32 AM   #11
Tarrasque
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 253
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Highbury View Post
That could be true, I don't know what the RN has now. In '82 they had 34 Harriers.
Unfortunately and very embarassingly they abolished the Sea Harriers in 2006. All the RN has now is the ground attack version (GR7) which whilst it can carry AA missiles, lacks any form of radar.

Also we no longer have a carrier of the size of the HMS Hermes (28 harrier capacity). All we have are the ships of the Invincible class which are significantly smaller (around 9 harriers) due to budget cuts in the 60s that decided that the UK didn't need aircraft carriers. (The invincible were snuck through the budget as 'through deck cruisers'.)
Tarrasque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 04:45 AM   #12
Nordmann
Commodore
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 628
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

Argentina will pout and posture, but I seriously doubt they will engage in any activity of a military nature. After all, they were sent well and truly packing last time, and if they dare attempt round two, we will gladly oblige them once again.

Some countries never learn, and if they do, it's always the hard way. The Falkland Islanders are British citizens, they do not want Argentinians walking all over them. If they were given the island, where to you think these residents would go? They would be forcibly moved, and to my mind, this is no different from the German antics of WWII.
__________________
"I must confess that my imagination refuses to see any sort of submarine doing anything but suffocating its crew and floundering at sea." - H. G. Wells
Nordmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 04:53 AM   #13
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

We have more forces on the Falklands than we did before the last war, and as the old saying goes "Fool me once..."
Argentina should know that and shouldn't try anything stupid.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 04:56 AM   #14
martes86
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Colourful Seville - Spain
Posts: 971
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
Default

War is not nice, at least according to Barbara Bush. Anyways, if there was another war, I'd really hope that Argentina won (I can't really say otherwise, I feel closer to argentinian people in all ways). Some countries also need a "Being humble: How to". If the UK dropped all the colonies it still posseses (or rather say, that the Crown posseses), it would lose a lot of problems. They could start by letting go of colonies within friend's (or so told) territories, like Gibraltar.

Cheers
martes86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-10, 05:06 AM   #15
Nordmann
Commodore
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 628
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
Default

What you mean to say, is that we should be crushed, and told what to do by other nations that have no damned right to. Sorry, but to me, it just sounds like you are sore because Spain has no "colonies" left.
__________________
"I must confess that my imagination refuses to see any sort of submarine doing anything but suffocating its crew and floundering at sea." - H. G. Wells
Nordmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.