![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 634
Downloads: 64
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
quick question kaleuns
ive saved up enough renown to upgrade from a type VII to a type IX what are the main benefits??? not necceseraly the spec thats shown...ie size/weight/displacement etc..but the actual ingame benefits. should i go upgrade or use my renown to aqquire all those lovely treats available to my type VII..cos my crew are giving me dirty looks when other type VII's are leaving the docks with new equipment on board!!!! and were still in basically the same standard boat we worked up in the baltic:rotfl: :rotfl:
__________________
May God Have Mercy Upon My Enemies ..... Because I Wont. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: LI NY
Posts: 964
Downloads: 13
Uploads: 0
|
Kaluen,
You will hear good arguments on both sides. There are extensive posts about this topic. But in the end its whichever boat you like better. Try the IX, if you like it keep it. If you dont, reload your old game and keep your VII. GL on your decision!! ![]() Either way you will have fun.
__________________
![]() "Only if I can save first..." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 135
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Whichever you feel most comfortable. Sometimes I started with IIA then IID, VIIB, VIIC, IXB, IXC, IXC/40, so on. In 44-45, I mostly prefer to have VIIC/41, 42, and XXI over any other boat cuz they dive deeper and quicker which is most important to me. I don't mind not getting much renown at those late years if I'm using VIIC/41,42 compare to IX varients cuz I always have enough renown to afford whatever I want. For early war year, I like VIIC cuz convoy isn't as interesting until 41 or after that makes me wish I had IXC cuz of how many juicy targets are involved.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Docked on a Russian pond
Posts: 7,072
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The type IX carries a large torpedo load (biggest advantage)
It dives like a lazy cow that's the big disadvantage. It has longer range (thus longer patrols) Personally I like the view from the bridge better.
__________________
Espionage, adventure, suspense, are just a click away Click here to look inside Brag's book: Amazon.com: Kingmaker: Alexey Braguine: Books Order Kingmaker here: http://www.subsim.com/store.html For Tactics visit:http://www.freewebs.com/kielman/ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 473
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Personally I'm a Type VII kaleun but that probably has more to do with my lack of stamina. I generally find out that my patience is used up long before the 14 eels in my boat. I tried a Type IX once before but just didn't take to it and came home with half my torps still inside. I promptly changed back
![]()
__________________
The beauty of not planning is that failure comes as a complete surprise without any of the stress that might normally precede such a venture |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Machinist's Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Docked at Kiel
Posts: 128
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
For me, it boils down to a simple question, do I want maneuverability (Type VII) or firepower (Type IX)? Type IX boats also allow you to patrol longer or reach far away places. Like Brag, I like the view from the bridge of the Type IX, and I find the boats appealing (maybe because it's bigger and my disillusion of, if it's bigger, it's deadlier), but you better be prepared for some skillful maneuvering to avoid depth charges and break contact if you're using a Type IX.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Springfield, Oregon
Posts: 161
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Nummer Zwei Uber Alles
![]() Smaller is harder to find. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Planesman
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: mississippi
Posts: 190
Downloads: 51
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
IXB is a fine submarine, one of its biggest advantages in my mind is its air capacity. Its kinda nice being able to stay under 17-18 hrs at a time without C02 levels rising above 50%. Especially in the summertime.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CG 96
Posts: 861
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Another aspect of the IX's is that their dive rate is extremely slow. There's a good chance that you'll take damage just from trying to dive which is frustrating as hell. Conversely though when weather permits my AA PO's shoot down a lot of planes. Oddly enough though O2 seems to be the biggest problem for long submerged sessions, my boat will run out of air before the batteries die.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brewsky, Galore
Posts: 618
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have a bit of a deja-vu feeling.......
Anyway I like both U-boats....... The VII because it feels just right, the type IX because of more eels to fire. But it is also a matter of taste, therefore I prefer the VII, but for no specific reason...i just like it more, something like preferring vanilla icecream over strawberry.
__________________
Daddy cool ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Try them all.
![]()
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany-Bayreuth
Posts: 276
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Played with a VIIc so far and liked it best:
Faster when it comes to under water (agility and speed) the smaller torp load is not the problem imho the IX was always -too big - too slow (under water) - too long patrols But as said above... I will give it a try now in my second GWX career (the first one was ended by a fatal windows crash and the loss of a whole partition ![]() So I started (after I installed EVERYTHING again) my second career in '42 with a IXc and will see :hmm: Both boats are good its just a matter what you want from wour boat. If you want to be fast and sneaky under water I suggest you stick with your VII as the IX really is much bigger and more like a buss But when it comes to firepower the IX is well equiped to rip a whole convoy to pieces ![]() ![]()
__________________
SH3 Commander GWX 2.0 OLC GUI |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
I joined the navy to see the world
But what did I see I saw the sea Visit those far off places in a monsun boat or loiter around West Africa, the Caribbean or East coast of America......IX ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany-Bayreuth
Posts: 276
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
First convoy encounter with my IX in year '42... sneaking in was not a problem!
The boat is very slow compared ti the VII but hey... that is the price for 22 torps and a range of almost 19.000 at 10kts ( the VIIc can still make 12-13.000 at this speed)
__________________
SH3 Commander GWX 2.0 OLC GUI |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Sailor man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 47
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Cheers, Stephen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|