![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Should the "bathtub" be put back in? | |||
Yes, its historically correct, and Dan's probably right about refits |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
50 | 60.98% |
No, i hate it, i dont care, just don't gimme the bathtub! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 25.61% |
Whichever, i don't care one way or the other. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 13.41% |
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
Tmaru and the "Bathtub"
Thinking of putting it back, for two reasons:
1.) This post: Quote:
So accordingto Dan, its not broke. I did acutally see a refit ONCE, when the game first came out, lost the bathtub and wondered why. 2.) Tower design is historically correct. http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0820801.jpg Grayback (SS-208), port side view,Electric Boat Co., Groton, CT., 31 January 1941. And if THIS picture doesnt prove it, nothing will: http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0821238.jpg Crew of the Gato (SS-212) posing for a shot in the Northern Pacific, circa 1942. Personally, i'd like to put it back, but i'll go with the concensus on this one. Last edited by Ducimus; 08-07-07 at 12:27 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|