![]() |
Tmaru and the "Bathtub"
Thinking of putting it back, for two reasons:
1.) This post: Quote:
So accordingto Dan, its not broke. I did acutally see a refit ONCE, when the game first came out, lost the bathtub and wondered why. 2.) Tower design is historically correct. http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0820801.jpg Grayback (SS-208), port side view,Electric Boat Co., Groton, CT., 31 January 1941. And if THIS picture doesnt prove it, nothing will: http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0821238.jpg Crew of the Gato (SS-212) posing for a shot in the Northern Pacific, circa 1942. Personally, i'd like to put it back, but i'll go with the concensus on this one. |
Doesn't bother me, I don't fight airplanes.
Be nice if I could get the crew to use the guns on sampans and other small craft, though. Particularly if they fought back and it hurt the deck crew... tater |
Doesn't bother me either. Was never a good shot anyway :lol:
|
I have to vote no on this one. If they had made the patch fix the bathtub problem (the camera problem really) then I would say leave it historical. But - going back to the historical tower means that those who WANT to play using AA guns CAN'T - and haven't we all said that CHOICE balancing realism is what we desire?
Ducimus, if you go decide to go back to the old tower, then at least make it an OPTION instead of one way or the other. I don't fight planes myself, but I created a tower mod myself because people wanted the option of having a chance to use the AA gun. Lets not also forget, you may one day be damaged heavily and stuck on the surface with planes incoming and an unusable AA gun..... Shouldn't YOU have the choice too? |
Quote:
RDP |
I'd have to say yes put it back on, particularly as I seem only to get this problem with twin machine guns not with the singles and I also just dive away when I get a aircraft contact. Mind you it would be nice for people to have the option whether they want it or not if at all possible.
|
I say take it off, even though it is realistic with it on but I just get so sick of getting bombed and sunk by 2 Betty's because the stupid bathtub gets in the way.
|
I voted yes because it is historcorly corect but I dont agrie with Dan's way of refits.
|
The problem with having a "chance" on returning to base could still mean you'll have a bathtub forever. :down:
I wouldn't mind seeing it very early in the war but I have doubts that they are removed when they should be. |
Quote:
|
if its historically correct, sure.
Any picts of the "bathtub"? |
I voted yes
But only under the condition that the camera issue gets fixed with a patch. I don't see why it should be either historically accurate OR the ability to fire at all angles. I think it should be historically accurate AND the ability to fire at all angles.
p.s.: and why am I a medic now? EDIT: Ah, I changed to something else...interesting! |
hmmm, gameplay vs. historical realism .... I tend to agree with the naysayers on this one, option for no bathtub for me thanks!
|
Voted for the Historically correct one. Down the road we could maybe do a tweak for the "position of that gun" to lift it a bit maybe to avoid the blocked view.
|
Quote:
Keep it historic. p.s. wait till you get " the one night in Bangkok avatar" :rotfl: :rotfl: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.