An idea: A subsim GWX tonnage war!

Ducimus · 02-13-07, 08:11 PM

I had an ephiphany which i thought might put some additional zest into the game.

Basic premise is sort of like wolves at war. The idea (which im only presenting, and not officially stating) is thus:

-A date/year is chosen to start in.
-All participants start a career game in that year/month.
-A date/year is chosen to end in.
-All participants have i dunno, 2 to 4 weeks to reach the finish date.

- at finish date all participants must produce the patrol log as generated by SH3 commander as proof of their deeds. (i think i might have the bandwidth to host these logs)

- Member with most tonnage wins... something, at the least, bragging rights.

Only rules i can think of (up for debate if this idea gets serious)

- Mod must be GWX
- Sensors.dat, AI sensors.dat, sim.cfg, contacts.cfg, airstrike.cfg and torpedo's.sim/zon must be unmodded.
- realism settings should have some minimum requirement.
- boat used must be historically avialable at the time. Either by commission date or first sailing date.

Good idea? bad idea?

azn_132 · 02-13-07, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus

I had an ephiphany which i thought might put some additional zest into the game.

Basic premise is sort of like wolves at war. The idea (which im only presenting, and not officially stating) is thus:

-A date/year is chosen to start in.
-All participants start a career game in that year/month.
-A date/year is chosen to end in.
-All participants have i dunno, 2 to 4 weeks to reach the finish date.

- at finish date all participants must produce the patrol log as generated by SH3 commander as proof of their deeds. (i think i might have the bandwidth to host these logs)

- Member with most tonnage wins... something, at the least, bragging rights.

Only rules i can think of (up for debate if this idea gets serious)

- Mod must be GWX
- Sensors.dat, AI sensors.dat, sim.cfg, contacts.cfg, airstrike.cfg and torpedo's.sim/zon must be unmodded.
- realism settings should have some minimum requirement.
- boat used must be historically avialable at the time. Either by commission date or first sailing date.

Good idea? bad idea?

Would 70% realism be fine for the minimum requirement?

Zantham · 02-13-07, 08:27 PM

Or divide it up between those that use full auto targetting, weapons officer assist, and manual targeting, and set up a minimum realism requirement for each.

ReallyDedPoet · 02-13-07, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zantham

Or divide it up between those that use full auto targetting, weapons officer assist, and manual targeting, and set up a minimum realism requirement for each.

Like that one

Phil · 02-13-07, 08:29 PM

put me down for full auto:rotfl:

TarJak · 02-13-07, 08:33 PM

Not a bad idea. You should have a split between the Full auto and the full Manual targetting as there can be some real differences in hit rates between the two. would be interesting though if the best of the manual targetters got more tonnage than the best of the full auto guys!

mookiemookie · 02-13-07, 08:39 PM

I'd sign up for that in a heartbeat! I've been on a bit of hiatus from SH3 lately, but this would definately get me going on it again.

FIREWALL · 02-14-07, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azn_132

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ducimus

I had an ephiphany which i thought might put some additional zest into the game.

Basic premise is sort of like wolves at war. The idea (which im only presenting, and not officially stating) is thus:

-A date/year is chosen to start in.
-All participants start a career game in that year/month.
-A date/year is chosen to end in.
-All participants have i dunno, 2 to 4 weeks to reach the finish date.

- at finish date all participants must produce the patrol log as generated by SH3 commander as proof of their deeds. (i think i might have the bandwidth to host these logs)

- Member with most tonnage wins... something, at the least, bragging rights.

Only rules i can think of (up for debate if this idea gets serious)

- Mod must be GWX
- Sensors.dat, AI sensors.dat, sim.cfg, contacts.cfg, airstrike.cfg and torpedo's.sim/zon must be unmodded.
- realism settings should have some minimum requirement.
- boat used must be historically avialable at the time. Either by commission date or first sailing date.

Good idea? bad idea?

Would 70% realism be fine for the minimum requirement?

NO

02-13-07, 08:11 PM	#1
Ducimus Rear Admiral Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 12,987 Downloads: 67 Uploads: 2	An idea: A subsim GWX tonnage war! I had an ephiphany which i thought might put some additional zest into the game. Basic premise is sort of like wolves at war. The idea (which im only presenting, and not officially stating) is thus: -A date/year is chosen to start in. -All participants start a career game in that year/month. -A date/year is chosen to end in. -All participants have i dunno, 2 to 4 weeks to reach the finish date. - at finish date all participants must produce the patrol log as generated by SH3 commander as proof of their deeds. (i think i might have the bandwidth to host these logs) - Member with most tonnage wins... something, at the least, bragging rights. Only rules i can think of (up for debate if this idea gets serious) - Mod must be GWX - Sensors.dat, AI sensors.dat, sim.cfg, contacts.cfg, airstrike.cfg and torpedo's.sim/zon must be unmodded. - realism settings should have some minimum requirement. - boat used must be historically avialable at the time. Either by commission date or first sailing date. Good idea? bad idea?

02-13-07, 08:39 PM	#7
mookiemookie Navy Seal Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 9,404 Downloads: 105 Uploads: 1	I'd sign up for that in a heartbeat! I've been on a bit of hiatus from SH3 lately, but this would definately get me going on it again. __________________ They don’t think it be like it is, but it do. Want more U-boat Kaleun portraits for your SH3 Commander Profiles? Download the SH3 Commander Portrait Pack here.

02-13-07, 08:27 PM	#3
Zantham 中国水兵 Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 283 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 1	Or divide it up between those that use full auto targetting, weapons officer assist, and manual targeting, and set up a minimum realism requirement for each.

02-13-07, 08:29 PM	#5
Phil Helmsman Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Newark delaware Posts: 110 Downloads: 4 Uploads: 0	put me down for full auto:rotfl:

02-13-07, 08:33 PM	#6
TarJak Fleet Admiral Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,052 Downloads: 150 Uploads: 8	Not a bad idea. You should have a split between the Full auto and the full Manual targetting as there can be some real differences in hit rates between the two. would be interesting though if the best of the manual targetters got more tonnage than the best of the full auto guys!