![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 271
Downloads: 82
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Hello guys,SH4 is almost out and sure it will bring us interesting moments.But,now seriously I think its time for Ubi developers to bring SH into a new dimension.
Imagine a post war base game,giving special atention to graphics quality,global representation,modern ports and naval bases,at least the most important ones on every continent. Concerning the subs,lets implement two,lets say an Skipjack and Alpha,but in a very very detailed way.Lets implement almost all 3d compartments,command room,officers room,sail,torpedo room,reactor control center.....etc. This way,once a base game is launched with that,more detailed units can follow,implementing the weapon-systems modernization, Sturgeon class,688,688i,Seawolf,Virginia, and SSBN classes,from both US and URSS,this for not talking about Royal Navy,French.....and so. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Peoples Republic of West Yorkshire
Posts: 326
Downloads: 70
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Running subs aground since SH1 and Silent Service Running SH5 @ 100% difficulty + TWoS 2.2.19(RealNav + BDU + port smoke + food) + Carotio_IntercontinentalRadioPack tweaked + The Little Ships of SH5 - Coaster Pack |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,177
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Personally, I enjoy the WWII theatre and would be quite content to see the SH4 engine evolve even further and then return back to the Atlantic theatre.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 210
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
SH has always been during WWII and will probably continue to be that way. Besides this topic has been beat to death already:
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=100003 EDIT: Just noticed that you are the creator of the other thread too Last edited by Nightmare; 02-08-07 at 12:14 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Grey Wolf
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Modern subs for the Silent Hunter series doesn't interest me at all. I kinda like DW, but I don't want to see DW in the Silent Hunter series. Just me, I guess....
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I welcome any new subsim and setting, but why does it have to be Silent Hunter?
The series changed dev teams but stayed in the same period. I don't see why it has to go anywhere but that. Also, I don't think there's real incentive. There is a LOT of WWII-related features that even SHIV doesn't hit on, and that a continuation of the series could implement. At the same time there is a solid base to build on. I just don't see why all of that needs to be discarded for starting from scratch - and make no mistake, something like that would be a start from scratch. There is so much different in modern sub warfare that the engine and developer experience from SHIII will be more or less useless for doing a game like that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
I said pretty much the same thing on the SH5 thread; there is plenty of room for a new modern-age subsim, just not with the Silent Hunter name.
CCIP, I see that you're a traditionalist, hearking back to the "Torpedo momber" days":rotfl: ![]()
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,691
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
To the first post I reply with a short and blunt "No"... imagine Arnie saying it for added effect.
SH4 is a WWII sim. Modern Subsims are like modern flight sims, in that they modell advanced electronic beyond visual range crap. Borderline ok for a flightsim, but plain boring for a subsim. Very little is actually known about the real workings of the modern equipment, plus any conflicht needs to be some cheesy hypothetical. WW2 sets the perfect arena for subsims, as alot is known on the workings and specs of everything in the game. Plus surface and periscope attacks are so much cooler. The very nature of the WW2 U-boat/submarine is fundamentally different to that of a modern nuclear. WW2 subs are actually more like temporarily submersible torpedo boats. Like others have said, there is already dangerous waters. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I think it's the hypothetical "wars" or "conflicts" that bug me the most about modern sims of any kind. Please, don't get me wrong, I like modern subs and as I said I kinda like DW. (I like Sub Command a lot.) But try as you might there's still a sense of science fiction and forced story lines about modern sub sims that you don't have with WWII. Trust me, that's telling coming from me because I have written and published some science fiction.
There are game venues for modern subsims. I don't see the SH series as a good fit. Now, a WWI sub sim in Silent Hunter is something I'd like to see.... :hmm:
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Finally, it's not like I wouldn't like to play a very detailed Skipjack or 688 or whatever, along the lines as described. Are you kidding? I would LOVE that. But what's the story line gonna be? Yet another "war" or some political brush fire in the Middle East? Puh-leeze...
And as someone mentioned...peri attacks are just so much cooler than pushing a button and scratching your ass while a missile flies across the ocean to take out an illegal drug lab somewhere. *Yawn*
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: 5 Miles Inland West Of Lake Huron
Posts: 1,936
Downloads: 139
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What makes the Silent Hunter so "great" is that you have to get close to your quarry.
You have to evade the escorts which can out run your boat surfaced or otherwise. A real "cat & mouse" experience. You can opt to manually set up your torpedo runs to attack the ships. You have to constantly be on the lookout for E/A. Your lookouts have to be able to spot surface ships, far enough away to let you crashdive. You can have realistic torpedoes that misfire, or run too deep, but I have yet to see one run wild, but got chased by one of my own acoustic torpedoes that exploded prematurely. Glad it was too far away from the boat to cause any damage. But scared the bejesus out of me, as we dived quickly to 150m. No super advanced radar, and sonar. Or sonar bouys. Besides, WWII is where sub, and anti-sub tactics really were pioneered, and the developement of both really excellerated.
__________________
A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law. -John Marshall Chief Justice of the Supreme Court --------------------- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Commodore
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: That lil island above france
Posts: 601
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Of course they could always add an unlockable Los Angeles class submarine to SH4 :p
you would have to do something pritty extreme to unlock it.... maybe take down the yamato by ramming it in a S-class :rotfl:
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 462
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Why don't we get a I-boat sim, or a British / French or even Russian subsim
![]() I-boat seems cool and I think you guys will definitely love it... ![]() Just hope that you won't be the captain of a kamikaze or midget sub... ![]() What we want is a more realistic world - different cargoes got slight different, different DDs with different numbers printed on the hulls. The most important thing - AI subs and AI torpedoes... Hope that your @ss won't be chased by a Fido... ![]() British and French subs looks cool, however they cannot do much job (especially French as it was occupied by Nazis after 1940) Britian busily building fighters to counterstrike Ju-88s instead of subs... ![]() The reason that the developers don't put subs of other nations in are because 1) Lack of data: Who know so much about I-boat and willing to do the research? Search for U-boat or American subs are far much easier ![]() 2) Lack of doctine: USA and Nazi Germany got a unrestricted sub doctine, but how about the others??? Japs put resources in Yamato but not I-boats, got tons of I-boats but cannot bring any significant threat to Australia... ![]() 3) Language problem: Who the hell is willing to visit Japanese sites to acquire Japanese sub datas? Even if you are willing to do so, can u read Japanese??? ![]() For me, the theme is not important, but WE MUST HAVE AI SUBS IN SH5 ![]()
__________________
Romeo is here, but where is Juliet? ![]() The 中国水兵 (Chinese Sailor) in subsim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|