![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Born to Run Silent
|
X1: British Convoy Killing Sub
An interesting article about a massive sub the Brits could have used on the Germans in WWII:
Quote:
.
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Rear Admiral
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10,151
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() Sounds more like a submersable cruiser |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
To bad there is no pictures with the article or even a sketch. But WOW, how the war could have turned if this baby was cruising about!
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,395
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
sounds like something you wouldn like meet
unless you had the element of suprise and knew how to use it properly |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 470
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Surcouf: The largest operational submarine in the world during her service.
Well, as you might expect, the French did build it, and it did not work very well. Very cool though. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_submarine_Surcouf ![]()
__________________
Commander Hiram Cassedy: "Tigrone has saved the Air Force and is now returning to Iwo Jima with 28 rescued zoomies." B-29 SNUFFY & THE SHIF'LESS SKONKS among them. I've a broom at the mast said he, for the broom is a sign for me, that wherever I go, I sweep the mighty sea. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,376
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
I wonder how the French Surcouf and her would have compared ? :hmm:
Surcouf: Displacement:3250 tons surfaced 4304 tons submerged 2880 tons deadLength:110 metres (361 feet)Beam:9 metres (29.5 feet)Draught:7.25 metres (23.8 feet)Propulsion:surfaced: two Sulzer diesel engines 7600hp submerged: two electric motors 3400hp two propellersSpeed:18.5 knots surfaced 10 knots submerged Range:18,500 kilometres (10,000 nautical miles) at 10 knots surfaced 12,600 kilometres (6800 nautical miles) at 13.5 knots surfaced 130 kilometres (70 nautical miles) at 4.5 knots submerged 110 kilometres (60 nautical miles) at 5 knots submergedTest depth:80 metres (250 feet)Capacity:280 tonsComplement:eight officers 110 menArmament:two 203 mm (eight-inch) guns in twin turret two 37 mm antiaircraft cannon four 13.2 mm antiaircraft machineguns eight 550 mm torpedo tubes (14 torpedoes carried) four 400 mm torpedo tubes (eight torpedoes carried)Aircraft carried:one Besson MB.411 float plane |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,010
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Let us not forget the WWI M class Brit subs with their 305MM (12inch) gun.
This was to be used as shore bombardment but the Brits felt if they used it the Germans would copy the idea so decided not to use it as they were more vunerable to a duplicate weapon. Like buying a shotgun to protect your family but not shooting the intruder for fear of his lawyer! Wulfmann
__________________
"The right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed upon, if only to prevent tyranny in government" Thomas Jefferson,; Constitutional debates |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,010
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Imagine if this could be turned and fired to the broadside! How many roll overs would it make?
Wulfmann ![]()
__________________
"The right to keep and bear arms should not be infringed upon, if only to prevent tyranny in government" Thomas Jefferson,; Constitutional debates |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Engineer
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 212
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Okay now that's just scary. I wonder how much of the performance would be retained on an operational boat as compared to the specs though. At first glance I'd guess it'd actually handle like a pig on ice. :hmm:
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,395
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
sure its a U-boat? not a U-artillery :rotfl:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Lets not forget the german type IX subs. They never got off the drawing board tho....
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
WOW
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|