Change of pace.

IceGrog · 12-19-06, 10:26 AM

Haven’t loaded the new puppy GWX yet, probably will not until I have a computer upgrade.
Anyway, I was in GW campaign last night, late 1943, when I came upon a convoy, I was trying to work my way around it to get in front but ran into a destroyer, after much time and trouble I finally got him, was really into it, what’s the word, immersed, when I used that nasty camera to see what damage I did to that escort, when I zoomed in and saw the Stars and Strips my heart skipped a little, I know it’s just a game, but that half a second it was what the @@%%$^##@

VIICDriver · 12-19-06, 10:30 AM

If your PC can handle GW you should have no issue with GWX. I actually get better frames with GWX than I did with previous versions.

Chuck

Corsair · 12-19-06, 05:18 PM

I run a dual install with NYGM and GWX and didn't so far see a difference in the frame rates. Lower is in ports where I go down to around 20 but still acceptable and I run them on a laptop with only 512 k RAM and a 128m graphic card. So don't hesitate to download it ...

IceGrog · 12-19-06, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corsair

I run a dual install with NYGM and GWX and didn't so far see a difference in the frame rates. Lower is in ports where I go down to around 20 but still acceptable and I run them on a laptop with only 512 k RAM and a 128m graphic card. So don't hesitate to download it ...

ok then i think i'll do one GWX & one GW
as for for NYGM i've this in posts before but what is the difference in it

Jimbuna · 12-20-06, 05:13 PM

You should find GWX no heavier on your computers resources than GW was

Schatten · 12-20-06, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimbuna

You should find GWX no heavier on your computers resources than GW was

Indeed. GWX actually runs a little more smoothly for me than GW did, most noticably at higher time compression rates.

The Noob · 12-20-06, 06:03 PM

I, as a low end user, second this. GWX runs way better then GW 1.1a did.

12-19-06, 10:26 AM	#1
IceGrog Engineer Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: USA on the edge of the Pacific Posts: 217 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Change of pace. Haven’t loaded the new puppy GWX yet, probably will not until I have a computer upgrade. Anyway, I was in GW campaign last night, late 1943, when I came upon a convoy, I was trying to work my way around it to get in front but ran into a destroyer, after much time and trouble I finally got him, was really into it, what’s the word, immersed, when I used that nasty camera to see what damage I did to that escort, when I zoomed in and saw the Stars and Strips my heart skipped a little, I know it’s just a game, but that half a second it was what the @@%%$^##@ __________________ U-551 7th Flottille Laid down: 21 Nov, 1939, Blohm & Voss, Hamburg Commissioned: 7 Nov, 1940 Commander: Kptlt. IceGrog von Ritter Sunk: 12/11/1940, 01/01/1941, 10/16/1941, 01/16/1942, 08/04/1943 .................................................. .......... A bartender is just a pharmacist with a limited inventory

12-19-06, 05:18 PM	#3
Corsair Ace of the Deep Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Toulouse France Posts: 1,140 Downloads: 51 Uploads: 0	I run a dual install with NYGM and GWX and didn't so far see a difference in the frame rates. Lower is in ports where I go down to around 20 but still acceptable and I run them on a laptop with only 512 k RAM and a 128m graphic card. So don't hesitate to download it ... __________________ NYGM 3.4A / Living SH3 V5.1 + SH3 Commander

12-20-06, 05:13 PM	#5
Jimbuna Chief of the Boat Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: 250 metres below the surface Posts: 190,481 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 13	You should find GWX no heavier on your computers resources than GW was __________________ Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. Oh my God, not again!!

12-19-06, 10:30 AM	#2
VIICDriver Engineer Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Lynchburg, VA Posts: 203 Downloads: 2 Uploads: 0	If your PC can handle GW you should have no issue with GWX. I actually get better frames with GWX than I did with previous versions. Chuck

12-20-06, 06:03 PM	#7
The Noob The Old Man Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: de_dust2 Posts: 1,417 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	I, as a low end user, second this. GWX runs way better then GW 1.1a did.