![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deland, Fl
Posts: 25
Downloads: 103
Uploads: 0
|
Invincible Planes in GWX???
Im in august of 1941, 2nd F, IXB.
There seems to be an issue where my flak gunners and I cannot shoot down planes. I've fired hundreds of 20 and 37 mm rounds at them and I can see that the rounds are hitting but there doesn't seem to be any apparent damage... ![]() Heres a list of the mods im running: Code:
GWX - VIIC41 Player Sub GWX - Late War Sensors Snorkel Antennas Conus' SH3GWXWS 2.3 Supplement to V16A3 (JSGME) MEP v3 VisualSensors for gwx3 O2-Gauges v2 M.E.P v3 FlatSunFix for M.E.P v3 Rbs1_SH4_Effects_GWX_30_71 Rbs10-enhancedoilexplosion Bad Weather Fix V1.1 (Standard) Type IXc - The Wolf Real Depth Charge normal Torpedo damage Final ver2.0 Anybody have a clue what it could be? It just seems so weird... and it's just allied aircraft. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 350
Downloads: 54
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It helps to have a flak-qualified Watch Officer on the bridge,
![]() You'll be lucky to shoot down anything manning the flak gun yourself. Hit something? Yes; hit it enough to shoot it down? No. ![]()
__________________
Raptor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deland, Fl
Posts: 25
Downloads: 103
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The plane in question was a twin engine bomber, I think it was British. Sorry I don't know my planes, I just consider them all dangerous.
I swear we (the AI and I) hit it several times to no effect. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Chief
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Drowning in mods soup
Posts: 327
Downloads: 466
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Captain
|
![]()
Imo, you stand almost no chance if it isn't a swordfish.
![]() Seek the deep.
__________________
"Noch und Noch" Prowling the Nord Atlantik with GWX 3.0. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
But not too deep
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 748
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Unless you feel like everyone in the crew could stand to lose a little weight immediately.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: Japanese auxiliary cruiser, 15000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive. ![]() Read Brag's stuff ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
GWX is meant to be a realism mod, and the reality was that aircraft were exceedingly dangerous to u-boats. Even the famous u-flak boats were prey to the planes. You should never try to fight one.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,639
Downloads: 75
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The bi-planes you can tear up pretty good with one of those 4-barreled machine gun mounts. I can nail them good.
But I went toe-to-toe with some 2-engined bomber and I got him but it took me down to 85% HI. Not worth it. Steve |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deland, Fl
Posts: 25
Downloads: 103
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
It's just mystifying when you are shooting at a plane 3 to 4 hundred meters away while its nose diving on you and you can see the bullets impacting all over the cockpit and wings yet it doesn't take any damage |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
The stock game had the weirdness that your sub could be attacked by dozens of aircraft, shoot down most of them and ultimately be overwhelmed by numbers. The reality was that one plane was enough to ruin a kaleun's career. Permanently. I think that the only way for modders to make them harder to shoot down was to make them stronger than they were in real life. It's either that or the u-boat ends up not fearing the planes at all. Unfortunately the game is far from perfect. It seems to be one or the other.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
And yes, the four engined LRMP's and most of the twins were armoured, some more than others. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
I've never heard that before. Links?
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 748
Downloads: 131
Uploads: 0
|
![]() ![]() Some planes gained reputations for being able to take on extraordinary amounts of AA fire. Like this B-17 that landed on its own power... and that's why I never engage them.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: Japanese auxiliary cruiser, 15000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive. ![]() Read Brag's stuff ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]()
That particular B-17 wasn't hit by AA fire. It was rammed by a Bf.109.
http://saltofamerica.com/contents/di...cle.aspx?18_90 The B-17 was famous for bringing its crews home, except for the 40% that didn't. Of 11,931 B-17s built, 4,754 didn't return. On the other hand the B-24 was famous for not bringing its crews home. The funny part is that out of 18,482 Liberators built, 2,112 of them didn't make it back. That's a loss rate of 11%. http://www.taphilo.com/history/8thaf/8aflosses.shtml None of the Allied bombers were armored.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|