PRE RELEASE SHIV Screenshot thread

[Jimbuna]

They could be vents :hmm:

[danlisa]

I know these screenies are from an incomplete game.

However, regardless of the fact that I don't know the forward speed of the surfacing boat (above), there doesn't seem to be much/enough water disturbance around the sub at all.

Wouldn't the conning tower produce 'white water' as it breached the surface? Also, what about the bow wave and subsequent water disturbance along the entire length of the hull?

It just seems a little too 'clean'.:88)

[Schunken]

I think the boat on zhaz screen surface at very low forward speed...this can be the reason for not see "whitewater" at the tower and the forward parts.....;)

Andreas

[danlisa]

That's what I thought, however, looking through this link - http://www.marinesims.de/site/silent-hunter-4/sh4-34.html I still don't see much in the way of water disturbance.

Does anyone have a screenie of a SH4 Sub surfacing or surfaced and running at speed?

[Sulikate]

Man, this transparent water effect is.. AMAZING:D

[Jimbuna]

IIRC the published minimum pc requirements are up from 1.4Ghz (SH3) to 2Ghz...yet RAM is still at an unbelievably low 512MB. :hmm:

[EinsteinEP]

You're right, I don't believe it. Well, maybe if you run the game in 240x320 resolution, black-and-white...

I've got 1.5GB RAM on my PC and I'll be amazed if THAT'S enough to reproduce what we've been seeing here.

[DanCanovas]

http://uk.media.pc.gamespy.com/media/736/736194/imgs_1.html

3 new screens here, not sure if they have already been seen but they were posted 4 days ago on Gamespy. :up:

[Jimbuna]

Nope...never seen them yet Dan :nope: ...cheers :up:

[DanCanovas]

no worries mate ;)

[Paajtor]

Yeah touched pics are great, in game pics are just ok, slightly better than SH3. If this game needs some super pc, i only ask why? The new shaders and transparency are more than enough for me, to make SH4 look the way I want it to.
If the system-specs are raised substantially, than I only hope it's because AI objects will behave more realistic, demanding a faster CPU.
For example, look at SH3 aircrafts behave: their damage- and flight-model is a joke, imo....same goes for AI subs...but I don't want to complain, as I'm still enjoying SH3 very much.

[Captain Krunch]

http://uk.media.pc.gamespy.com/media/736/736194/imgs_1.html

3 new screens here, not sure if they have already been seen but they were posted 4 days ago on Gamespy. :up:
Actually, I though they were new, too, but then I saw that they were posted last October, in this very thread, as seen here:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showpost.php?p=330419&postcount=48

Who knows why both Gamespy and Gamespot are showing these as new images.

[geetrue]

http://uk.media.pc.gamespy.com/media/736/736194/imgs_1.html

3 new screens here, not sure if they have already been seen but they were posted 4 days ago on Gamespy. :up:
Actually, I though they were new, too, but then I saw that they were posted last October, in this very thread, as seen here:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showpost.php?p=330419&postcount=48

Who knows why both Gamespy and Gamespot are showing these as new images.

Are you the same Captain Krunch that use to play here back in 2001/2002?

[Captain Krunch]

Are you the same Captain Krunch that use to play here back in 2001/2002?

No, I'm a different guy.

[Jimbuna]

He's a commodore now :up: :D

[Boris]

Here's something we haven't seen before: :D

Notice the parachutes!

http://www.9teuflottille.de/site/sitedata/reports/pics/SH%204%20Presse-Event%20Hamburg/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20(5).jpg

http://www.9teuflottille.de/site/sitedata/reports/pics/SH%204%20Presse-Event%20Hamburg/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20(8).jpg

http://www.9teuflottille.de/site/sitedata/reports/pics/SH%204%20Presse-Event%20Hamburg/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-.jpg

Thanks to the 9te Flottille website

[DanCanovas]

nice pics! good transparent water images there

[Sulikate]

The transparent water looks great!

[DanCanovas]

The transparent water looks great!

it does doesnt it! very exciting

[Safe-Keeper]

Looking splendid. I like those parachutes, except the downed airmen look a bit... stiff.

Oh, and Boris, I for some reason couldn't see your pics before opening your post (by hitting "Quote"). Weird.

[Boris]

Huh, strange...

Anyway, the fact that there are downed airmen at all is good enough for me.

[Sailor Steve]

Take another look at the bottom one...he's running decks awash.

[Safe-Keeper]

Oh! Look at the search light/signal light on the bridge:up:! Anyone think we'll be able to use it?

[Sulikate]

Here is a enhanced and less jaggy version of a screenshot posted above I made:
http://img127.imagevenue.com/loc96/th_89117_SH4_edit_122_96lo.jpg (http://img127.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=89117_SH4_edit_122_96lo.jpg)

[Barkhorn1x]

I know these are all demo shots designed to show the dramatic Hollywood effect graphics, but surfacing your sub in the middle of an IJN battleline is just not an activity with any sort of a future as that Kongo BB is just not stopping. ;)


Barkhorn.

[Jimbuna]

Nice one :rock: :up:

[Safe-Keeper]

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/safe-keeper/Turnheraround.jpg

[Morts]

:rotfl: :rotfl:

[Anachronous]

The transparent surface looks great, unless you are in a submarine trying to be sneaky :P

I really hope the view distance is further in SH4. I hate seeing ships pop into view.

[Boris]

Good point, I wonder if the 8km default view distance of SH3 has been increased.

[flintlock]

Thanks for those, Boris.

Great screenshots, and although it's been said ad nauseam already, it needs to be said yet again: amazing translucent water effect!

[Safe-Keeper]

:rotfl: :rotfl:What? It's Parker's new anti-ramming tactic. He used it to great effect until his crew grew tired of cleaning up after the barrel-roll. Apparently everything not bolted down and secure would... move when the sub rolled around:shifty:.

We need to start up that "Funny SH4 images" thread again.

[Boris]

Here we go, even more shots from Hamburg, this time from the marinesims.de preview:

http://www.aotd-clan.com/Bilder/sh4event/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20%283%29.jpg


http://www.aotd-clan.com/Bilder/sh4event/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20%287%29.JPG

http://www.aotd-clan.com/Bilder/sh4event/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20%289%29.JPG

http://www.aotd-clan.com/Bilder/sh4event/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20(6).JPG

http://www.aotd-clan.com/Bilder/sh4event/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20%284%29.JPG

[Paajtor]

:o I'm speechless!!!

Any chance of a night-shot on those locations?

[Boris]

Well I don't make em, so I can't help you there. I too would like to see a night shot.

[Boris]

My theory on the lack of AA in the shots... the post processing effect they use looks like it has some form of HDR bloom. If it's anything like the bloom effect in SH3, it messes with the AA and makes it look pixelated. I think I might have the effect turned off once I get to play this.

[flintlock]

Is this algae floating in the water? Certainly looks like it. If it is: :up:

http://www.aotd-clan.com/Bilder/sh4event/SH4%20Hamburg%20event-8.02.2007-%20%289%29.JPG

[flintlock]

That last shot in Boris' post had me wondering why is the sub on the surface, then I noticed the extensive damage on it. Really nice new damage model. I hope it translates into physics as well as graphics.

Thanks again for the posts, Boris.

[Boris]

Don't thank me, thank marinesims and AOTD :D

[flintlock]

I'm thanking anyone who had anything to do with me being able to see these screenshots, and here on this thread - that's you, sailor!

:up:

[DanCanovas]

wow incredible shots!!

[Sonarman]

Anyone got a bilge pump... I'm drowning in a sea of drool!

[flintlock]

... I'm drowning in a sea of drool!
Now there's a pleasant image.

[rodan54]

Who needs torpedo attacks when you have..............

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6687/sh4hamburgevent80220075gj7.jpg

Lifeguard duty! :up:

Taken from the Marinesims.de preview.

[THE_MASK]

:o I'm speechless!!!

Any chance of a night-shot on those locations?

My attempt at photoshop (night time)

http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/1826/editus4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Ark]

Nice screenies, but, ACK...jaggies. :(

*Crosses fingers for FSAA*

[marius]

This game looks beautiful in low light conditions... senset and dusk. I love the highlights and shadows on the water.:up:

[kapitan_zur_see]

ok, this msg is mostly for people who were at either one of the previews events.

First: concerning the marinesims underwater screenshot, is it a REAL screenshot or one provided by UBI as some kind of presskit? What I mean is: is there angled light rays in SH4 as in this pic?

Second: i recall an "old" photoshopped underwater screenshot. As i outlined on this pic, does this screenshot reflects the way light is fading through water in real SH4?
http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/3064/02zk6.jpg

Or is it rather like this, much like in SH3 (pics from marinesims sh4 subs gallery):

http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/9245/05ph2.jpg

wich brings a second question: in the first pic, we now knows there's no depth-of-field blurred bubbles floating around but is everything else (colour rendition, blooms, light fading, caustics etc...) completely faithfull to real SH4? cause there's quite a HUGE difference in quality between those 2 pics

[Leod]

Who needs torpedo attacks when you have..............

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/6687/sh4hamburgevent80220075gj7.jpg

Lifeguard duty! :up:

Taken from the Marinesims.de preview.


Is it me or is there a number "2" hovering just next to the left ship, partially hidden by smoke?

[hyperion2206]

I see the number 2 as well. Could it be that there is a "F" before the "2"?

[Boris]

Has anyone also considered where that smoke is coming from? :doh:

[hyperion2206]

Has anyone also considered where that smoke is coming from? :doh:

Smoke that drifted away from BB No.2?

[Boris]

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f152/Boris117/weird.jpg

Explain all this then... :hmm:

[hyperion2206]

The only thing I can "explain" is the plane: It has cought fire, perhaps as phosphorus grenade has hit the tale.:roll:

[Boris]

Yeah, I realised that was fire... but no smoke. Also a couple of the ships are moving at speed but aren't smoking.

[hyperion2206]

The ship on the far right side does dmoke, but it's hard to see. Do you know if that's an early screenshot? Perhaps some of the graphic effects did not work properly.

[Safe-Keeper]

The two wisps of cloud in that circle are probably from the battleship's guns.

As for the "2", it's probably a debugging thing. That, or we can see tags over ships now, which'd be nice for the lower realism settings.

[flintlock]

I'm sure the devs would get quite a kick out of reading some of these posts. The way we're dissecting the screenshots, edited or otherwise, like they're forensic evidence from a crime scene.

:)

[hyperion2206]

I'm sure the devs would get quite a kick out of reading some of these posts. The way we're dissecting the screenshots, editied or otherwise, like they're forensic evidence from a crime scene.

:)


Great now I've got the theme song of CSI Miami stuck in my head:"Won't get fooled again". Thank you very much flintlock!:p

[Safe-Keeper]

Safe-Keeper [Smattering pipe]: Yes, my dear Hyperion, it is now obvious to me that, her alibi nonwithstanding, the BB Kobe did indeed down the fighters present on that fateful day.
Hyperion: But why, Safe-Keeper?
Safe-Keeper: Elementary, my dear Hyperion. If you notice the floating "2"...

And so on. Now we only need to make the arrest and buy more tobacco for my pipe.

[hyperion2206]

Safe-Keeper [Smattering pipe]: Yes, my dear Hyperion, it is now obvious to me that, her alibi nonwithstanding, the BB Kobe did indeed down the fighters present on that fateful day.
Hyperion: But why, Safe-Keeper?
Safe-Keeper: Elementary, my dear Hyperion. If you notice the floating "2"...

And so on. Now we only need to make the arrest and buy more tobacco for my pipe.


Classic, Safe-Keeper!:rotfl:The Next case will be: "Who sank the Yamoto?" Round up the usual suspects.:lol:

[Safe-Keeper]

I see it now... CLUE - The 40's Pacific Version:know:.

USS Avenger did it. In the Coral Sea. With the candlestick. Did I win?

At least we're not playing the navy version of Betrayal at House on the Hill. I hate it when my sub triggers the Haunt by entering the wrong patrol zone and activating one too many Omen cards, and it turns out my escorting Destroyer is in reality a Haunt, piloted by a werewolf bent on sub destruction.

[CCIP]

I see it now... CLUE - The 40's Pacific Version:know:.

USS Avenger did it. In the Coral Sea. With the candlestick. Did I win?

Well, I'd think as with every traditional mystery, the culprit was the butler (http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Base/1250/butler.html) :p

[Biggles]

Is it just me, or does it seem like the SH4 lads who take these pics has a good way of getting themselves into a whole shipload of problems most of the time....I mean, surfaced in the middle of a big BB convoy.....:gulp:

[Safe-Keeper]

Yes, they do that in just about every single movie and screenshot involving battle so far:rotfl:.

[Ark]

I'm sure the devs would get quite a kick out of reading some of these posts. The way we're dissecting the screenshots, editied or otherwise, like they're forensic evidence from a crime scene.

:)


Great now I've got the theme song of CSI Miami stuck in my head:"Won't get fooled again". Thank you very much flintlock!:p

Oh great...now I do too.

You bastards. lol

:lol:

[hyperion2206]

I'm sure the devs would get quite a kick out of reading some of these posts. The way we're dissecting the screenshots, editied or otherwise, like they're forensic evidence from a crime scene.

:)

Great now I've got the theme song of CSI Miami stuck in my head:"Won't get fooled again". Thank you very much flintlock!:p
Oh great...now I do too.

You bastards. lol

:lol:

Then have fun with "Who are you" and "Baba O'Reily":lol:

[Boris]

Aw, crap, I was just about to gloat about how I had no idea what the CSI themesong is and then you come along and post it... and I have to recognise it of course.

[hyperion2206]

Aw, crap, I was just about to gloat about how I had no idea what the CSI themesong is and then you come along and post it... and I have to recognise it of course.
Yep, I know all 3 theme songs for all 3 CSI series.:know::smug:
CSI Las Vegas: Who are you
CSI Miami: Won't get fooled again
CSI New York: Baba O'Reily

[Leod]

I see it now... CLUE - The 40's Pacific Version:know:.

USS Avenger did it. In the Coral Sea. With the candlestick. Did I win?

Well, I'd think as with every traditional mystery, the culprit was the butler (http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Base/1250/butler.html) :p

Very droll :rotfl:I think it deserves recognition.

[LukeFF]

Is it just me, or does it seem like the SH4 lads who take these pics has a good way of getting themselves into a whole shipload of problems most of the time....I mean, surfaced in the middle of a big BB convoy.....:gulp:

If you recall, they did that in one of the SH3 promo vids - the player surfaces the sub right next to a King George V class BB. :rotfl:

[Safe-Keeper]

Watch crew is still blind. And deaf.
http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/safe-keeper/Nothingouthere.jpg

[Jimbuna]

Watch crew is still blind. And deaf.
http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/safe-keeper/Nothingouthere.jpg

:rotfl: :rotfl: :up:

[Biggles]

Not to talk about the crew of that BB! ALL the guns are pointing somewere else.....

[Safe-Keeper]

Not to talk about the crew of that BB! ALL the guns are pointing somewere else.....I considered giving them speech bubbles with similar signs of blindness, but I declined. My best candidate was:

Japanese screw-up: Ala-a-a-rm! Enemy task force, 90 degre-e-e-es!
CO: Aha! All batteries, traverse to 90 degrees and prepare to shell some ass!
Japanese screw-up: Er, no, wait, it's just a seagull again. My bad.
CO: Aaaargh! $@]€$@€{:mad::damn:!

Oh well, they'll notice each others when the battleship runs the sub down.

[cobalt]

LIFERAFTS!

http://www.worthplaying.com/press/240/H4_WotP_049.jpg

[Biggles]

[quote]

Oh well, they'll notice each others when the battleship runs the sub down.

Don't be too sure......:smug:

[CCIP]

A few posted yesterday at Worthplaying that are of interest,
including the first shots of 1) new flak effects (very cool-looking); 2) nighttime/bad weather; 3) lifeboats!

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh401.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh402.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh403.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh404.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh405.jpg
And just look at that smoke. MAAAN!

[Biggles]

Wonderful!

but....again:

What is WITH these guys and surfacing in the worst possible spot in the ENTIRE pacific Ocean?!!

[flintlock]

What is WITH these guys and surfacing in the worst possible spot in the ENTIRE pacific Ocean?!! Perhaps done intentionally to get a good action screenshots?

[Respenus]

Now we finally have a SubSim worth the name! :up:

[Boris]

What is WITH these guys and surfacing in the worst possible spot in the ENTIRE pacific Ocean?!! Perhaps done this intentionally to get a good action screenshots?

No doubt...



Finally get to see liferafts :rock:

... and how awesome does the tracer fire in the sky look! :up:

[flintlock]

Stunning screenshots.

The more I see, the more I adjust my list of impending upgrades. :)

[Boris]

I wonder how the lifeboat thing has been done... how they appear I mean.

Do they just spawn, or are they somehow let off the ship? The former is a bit dodgy, but the latter maybe a little bit too much to hope for.

[flintlock]

Animated deployment would be great, though like you, I suspect it's likely a spawn.

[Biggles]

Well, they're there. That's the important thing eh?

[Sulikate]

Animated deployment would be great, though like you, I suspect it's likely a spawn.
I agree.

[Safe-Keeper]

Well, they're there. That's the important thing eh?Not to them:p.

[Paajtor]

What's will be the chance to witness events like those?
In campaign-mode, I mean....I have no doubt that great single-missions will be possible.

[Morts]

oh CCIP those pictures with the manned liferafts really make my trigger finger itch

i better man the 40mm flak:rotfl: :arrgh!:

[Safe-Keeper]

They're animated. The developers let me get my hands on a short preview video, in which an American destroyer is sunk. The lifeboats were lowered by the heroic crew, but unfortunately one of them capsized when the Destroyer sunk. It couldn't get away in time because Parker had to jump back aboard the ship for his teddy, and, upon returning, realized he'd also left his comics book.

But yes, it was quite a sight.

[Morts]

linky linky ?:D

[jimmie]

No doubt those are truly stunning pictures of art and I'm just simply impressed.

On the other hand, I have yet ever seen any caps on the water... all the water looks too calm... Bit messy looking water might look more realistic than glassy clean water.. I guess.

We haven't yet seen cloud generation? I still think the cloud texture does NOT look generic (same thing to textures used in major SH3 mods) but can quickly be looking repetitive(it's always "scattered" cloud of the same pattern), and moreover it looks very flat.

Tho can't complain for the awesome looking nevertheless.

[Mush Martin]

Watch crew is still blind. And deaf.
http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/safe-keeper/Nothingouthere.jpg
:rotfl: :rotfl: :up:

How did I get in there tell me I didnt get voted in as the new Bernard
I thought we were going for murphy?
MM

[Safe-Keeper]

No, the screw-up is Parker.

[rasmus1896]

A few posted yesterday at Worthplaying that are of interest,
including the first shots of 1) new flak effects (very cool-looking); 2) nighttime/bad weather; 3) lifeboats!

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh401.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh402.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh403.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh404.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/Otohiko/sh405.jpg
And just look at that smoke. MAAAN!

at the first picture: how it becomes that a big ,massive gun turret is floating like the liferafts?

[Jimbuna]

Point taken :yep: but an awesome picture nevertheless :rock:

[hyperion2206]

Could it be that the turret is still in the barbette and the stern is already beneath the waves.

[UglyMowgli]

Some screenshoot from the MS Team review:
[/URL]
[url]http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=16583&st=0&#entry136968 (http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=16583&st=0&#entry136968)

[AVGWarhawk]

I think the stern is down in that picture also.

[Barkhorn1x]

Could it be that the turret is still in the barbette and the stern is already beneath the waves.

You are correct sir, the Kongo class BB "Y" turret located far to the rear and on a lower deck than the "X" turret.

Barkhorn.

[hyperion2206]

Could it be that the turret is still in the barbette and the stern is already beneath the waves.
You are correct sir, the Kongo class BB "Y" turret located far to the rear and on a lower deck than the "X" turret.

Barkhorn.

I tried to identify the ship and thought of the 'Kongo' but the ship on the screenshot is so crippled (funnels are missing e.g.) that I wasn't sure.

[Barkhorn1x]

Some screenshoot from the MS Team review:

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=16583&st=0&#entry136968

Thanks for the screens - most are a bit on the dark side - which obscures some detail.

ATTENTION - AG124! New US a/c model spotted - in the first shot on the carrier deck - Brewster Buffalo's. :rock:

Barkhorn.

[Barkhorn1x]

Could it be that the turret is still in the barbette and the stern is already beneath the waves.
You are correct sir, the Kongo class BB "Y" turret located far to the rear and on a lower deck than the "X" turret.

Barkhorn.

I tried to identify the ship and thought of the 'Kongo' but the ship on the screenshot is so crippled (funnels are missing e.g.) that I wasn't sure.

Yea, I'm pretty sure that's a Kongo as the 2nd to last picture is from the same sequence and shows what happened a few minutes before no doubt.

Barkhorn.

[Sailor Steve]

Some screenshoot from the MS Team review:

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=16583&st=0&#entry136968
Ooooooh, nice!:sunny:

Wildcats on carrier deck!

Map showing fleet movements plus areas of Japanese domination!

Awesome-looking spreading wake ripples!

A bit of management-screen confusion: I thought that I, II, and III would be the watch shifts, but that first screen shows I, I, and II? On the other hand, it now says "Control Room" instead of "Command Room"!

We finally see a shot of the "Machinery" screen, and it appears to be a very detailed damage-control layout!

I can't stand all this excitement! I have to go take a nap!

[Paajtor]

check out this one (http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3700)...:o

[Sailor Steve]

Yeah, I love that new "See what's just below the surface" stuff.:rock:

[flintlock]

Now that's an awesome shot, Paajtor!

[Barkhorn1x]

Wildcats on carrier deck!



Actually, those are Brewster Buffalo's in that first shot - look at the tail and the landing gear.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2a/F2A-1_VF-3_CV-3_Felix_the_Cat.jpg

Barkhorn.

[Safe-Keeper]

I like that briefing map, too, with the arrows and marked territories and ship icons and whatnot.

Oh, and if you'll forgive me for adding something completely off-topic, do any of you get a Final Fantasy feeling when seeing those people stroll around on the battleship? It makes me want to take control of one of them and walk him around the ship, hitting the 'X' key to interact with the other sailors.

Tidus: Where on Earth is Yuna? Have you seen her, ensign Yoshi?
Ensign Yoshi: She went below-decks with Barret, kemosabe.
Lt. Cid: Yeah, said she wanted to see his blitz balls--
Tidus: Oh ****:o.
[Something big breaks surface 50 feet off, action music starts]
Tidus: Oh my God, Sin!
[Turrets traverse and take object out]
Lt. Cid: ...False alarm yet again, just 'nother Yankee sub. They always surface near these battleships.

[CCIP]

Tidus: Where on Earth is Yuna? Have you seen her, ensign Yoshi?
Ensign Yoshi: She went below-decks with Barret, kemosabe.
Lt. Cid: Yeah, said she wanted to see his blitz balls--
Tidus: Oh ****:o.
[Something big breaks surface 50 feet off, action music starts]
Tidus: Oh my God, Sin!
[Turrets traverse and take object out]
Lt. Cid: ...False alarm yet again, just 'nother Yankee sub. They always surface near these battleships.

:rotfl:

I think I'm gonna enjoy all the Japanese-related humor we'll get once SHIV rolls out as much as Ensign Parker :p

[Morts]

I like that briefing map, too, with the arrows and marked territories and ship icons and whatnot.

Oh, and if you'll forgive me for adding something completely off-topic, do any of you get a Final Fantasy feeling when seeing those people stroll around on the battleship? It makes me want to take control of one of them and walk him around the ship, hitting the 'X' key to interact with the other sailors.

Tidus: Where on Earth is Yuna? Have you seen her, ensign Yoshi?
Ensign Yoshi: She went below-decks with Barret, kemosabe.
Lt. Cid: Yeah, said she wanted to see his blitz balls--
Tidus: Oh ****:o.
[Something big breaks surface 50 feet off, action music starts]
Tidus: Oh my God, Sin!
[Turrets traverse and take object out]
Lt. Cid: ...False alarm yet again, just 'nother Yankee sub. They always surface near these battleships.

:rotfl: :rotfl: nice one:up:

[Shaffer4]

......All your battleships are belong to us......

Yeah... I said it... :nope:

[Safe-Keeper]

No, no, no it's "Your battleship everything belongs to us, it is".

It is:D!

I think I'm gonna enjoy all the Japanese-related humor we'll get [...]The fight of the chief it keeps being surprised:up:!

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/safe-keeper/FFXIII.jpg

[Sulikate]

Good one :arrgh!:

[AVGWarhawk]

Wildcats on carrier deck!


Actually, those are Brewster Buffalo's in that first shot - look at the tail and the landing gear.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2a/F2A-1_VF-3_CV-3_Felix_the_Cat.jpg

Barkhorn.
I agree. Question? Was the Brewster a carrier aircraft? I do not think so:hmm:. It was asked to have the arresting hook but I do not believe it saw service on the carriers.

[Sailor Steve]

Yes, the Buffalo was a carrier aircraft, and he's right; I was so excited I just assumed, and I assumed wrong.
The very first squadron went to USS Saratoga. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_Buffalo

On the other hand, I will reiterate my pet peeve: the plural of Buffalo is Buffaloes. Plurals NEVER use an apostrophe (').

[AVGWarhawk]

Yes, the Buffalo was a carrier aircraft, and he's right; I was so excited I just assumed, and I assumed wrong.
The very first squadron went to USS Saratoga. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_Buffalo

On the other hand, I will reiterate my pet peeve: the plural of Buffalo is Buffaloes. Plurals NEVER use an apostraphe (').

Or is it Buffali?

[Sailor Steve]

Yes, the Buffalo was a carrier aircraft, and he's right; I was so excited I just assumed, and I assumed wrong.
The very first squadron went to USS Saratoga. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_Buffalo

On the other hand, I will reiterate my pet peeve: the plural of Buffalo is Buffaloes. Plurals NEVER use an apostraphe (').

Or is it Buffali?
:rotfl:

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out that, while I have since corrected it in my own post, AVG's copy clearly shows that I misspelled apostrophe.:oops:

[Safe-Keeper]

Roman Buffali! Charge teh gaulz!

But no, plurals don't use apostrophes. Or apostraphes, for that matter:p.

[Biggles]

Anyone think that the planes will actually FALL OFF the carrier when it goes down?:)

[Safe-Keeper]

Nah, they're still super-glued to the carrier deck:p.

[Barkhorn1x]

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out that, while I have since corrected it in my own post, AVG's copy clearly shows that I misspelled apostrophe.:oops:

"Isn't it ironic, don'tcha think"?

;)

Barkhorn.

[hyperion2206]

Anyone think that the planes will actually FALL OFF the carrier when it goes down?:)

Have you seen the video where a BB is hit by a torpedo? Right after the impact the BB's seaplane is thrown into the water. This makes me believe that they will fall off... hopefully.:lol:

[Sailor Steve]

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out that, while I have since corrected it in my own post, AVG's copy clearly shows that I misspelled apostrophe.:oops:

"Isn't it ironic, don'tcha think"?

;)

Barkhorn.
That's why I mentioned it. I don't give anybody a break, even my other self.

[Jimbuna]

Nice shots :rock: ....I'd only seen a couple earlier :up:

[Morts]

nice pics kapitan
that 4th picture is a typical "oh *******:o " moment :rotfl:

[Safe-Keeper]

omg! lol that's one lame damage control conceptConstructive critisism forever:roll:.

I'm curious as to those "star camera" symbols. Are they photo recon mission objectives, or just symbols denoting where you have taken photos?

That junk is just too beautiful.

[flintlock]

Some cool new screens in that last lot! :D

[Safe-Keeper]

Look at the details of that junk! The sailors wearing different-coloured garments (and straw hats!), the tires hanging over the side...

http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r292/safe-keeper/Junk.jpg

I wonder if they wave at you when you pass them? It'd make me feel more "there".

This'll be so awesome. I think I'll take a patrol without shooting at anything, just taking in the sights of the Pacific:cool:. Ubi, I think you'll really hit the nail on the head this time.

[Paajtor]

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3738

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3737

[flintlock]

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3739

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/i...e=post&id=3740 (http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3740)

http://www.mille-sabords.com/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=3736

[HanSolo78]

new screens guys!

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot4.jpg

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot5.jpg

[Biggles]

man.....this game is gonna be awsome!!!!!!!:rock:

[Sockeye]

I think that second pic of the ocean-side town almost looks photo-real, or something placed on a postcard.

What comes to me is the image of a beautiful woman riding a bicycle through the town, her flower-print dress exposing liberal amounts of thigh and cleavage as she peddles towards the market to buy mangos, fending off amourous males along the way. All, of course, unaware of the terror that lurks off shore, its eye extended just above the water's surface and waiting for the prey that feeds the enemy war-machine.
:arrgh!:

[THE_MASK]

new screens guys!

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot4.jpg

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot5.jpg

The first thing i noticed on the second screen is that the mountain in the back ground looks about 60 kilometers away , not 16 or 8 .

[hyperion2206]

new screens guys!

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot4.jpg

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot5.jpg
The first thing i noticed on the second screen is that the mountain in the back ground looks about 60 kilometers away , not 16 or 8 .

These screenies were posted together with a dev diary on the German and French SH4 sites and in this diary the dev said the visual range was 20km.

[Buggins]

Really? Confirmation of a 20km visual range?

Awesome. :D

[UglyMowgli]

but what is the PC config : 2x8800GTX SLI and a quadCPU ?

[Ark]

but what is the PC config : 2x8800GTX SLI and a quadCPU ?

AFAIK, SHIV doesn't take advantage of SLI and Quad-core (SLI I'm not sure about).

[Tigerteeth]

Hi guys - this is my first post so please be gentle with me :D.

I've found five pages of screenshots over at http://www.jeuxvideopc.com/screenshots/8925-silent-hunter-4-wolves-of-the-pacific/

Having read through this thread I think about 30 screenshots are new (60 in total) - a mix of action and interface material. The images were posted on 22/02/2007.

I hope I'm not repeating old news.

Nice to be here - time for a beer.

TT

[Paajtor]

Yep, they are "old":D

But hey, welcome...and drinks are on Tigerteeth, guys!:()1:

[Tigerteeth]

Yep, they are "old":D

But hey, welcome...and drinks are on Tigerteeth, guys!:()1:

Oops - sorry lads :oops:.

Brain and eyesight obviously affected by copious consumption of Guinness.

Yep - virtual beers on me everyone.

TT

[Flanker15]

Someone said that the damage control looked lame but looking at the screenshot I noticed that there is no Hull damage % reading which is good for realisim sake.

[Jimbuna]

Welcome aboard Tigerteeth and Flanker15 :arrgh!:

[kapitan_zur_see]

oh well...okay, okay... using the term "lame" was an emotional response, i confess lol
what i do not like is the fact you don't get to see things like water flooding the compartments, fire animations etc... wich is important to me as they immerse you more. I've really hoped they would even do better than what was in SH3 but it's a sad regression instead. In fact the best one so far was SH1. I know this is just simples things,just animations and so on but i would have liked to see that. Even more, whith nowadays computers they could have modelled some water (with transparency and reflexion) slowly flooding the 3d compartments as in a FPS. would be a simple things to do. Nevertheless, damage model is really important in WWII era subsims as it makes for really tense "hollywood like" moments ;)

[Brag]

I'm not sure if these screenshots are new: http://www.24flotilla.com/html/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=19511

Muy bien hecho. Saludos a nuestros amigos en Espana!:up: :up:

[Rilder]

new screens guys!

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot4.jpg

http://www.ubisoft.de/marc/silenthunter4/screens/sshot5.jpg



It almost looks as if there using spirites for the trees and stuff on the coast line, if they are using spirites for stuff thats pretty far out I can see how they increased graphics so well.

[jafergon]

There's a bunch of new screenshots at this Spanish gaming site:

http://pc.hardgame2.com/index.php?zone=fichas&mod=ficha&idf=857&mod=images&page=1

[kapitan_zur_see]

thanks for that link ;)
Damn, are those screens looks good! The ocean has never looked so realistic in a game, we're really close to photorealism now! And at least! some underwater shots! Well, i'm a little disapointed to see that those early shots we saw were indeed heavily photoshoped and ingame pics are not that close but still, it does look impressive and movie-like!!
:rock::rock::rock:

[Jimbuna]

Some good/new ones there for sure :rock:

[Paajtor]

http://fichas.hardgame2.net/fichas/silenthunter4:wolvesofthepacific/pc/album/17.jpg

Huh?:hmm:

[Sulikate]

Well, these may be graphical artifacts or spotlights:huh:

[Killjoy]

Lasers

[Capt.LoneRanger]

The deathstar firing.

[Ark]

It looks like an HDR bug (or bug having to do with HDR). I've seen it in a few games.

[flyingdane]

Looks like cannon or tracer fire to me ;)

[The General]

P.O.V. of somebody dropping their chopsticks overboard?

Seriously though, I hope the Free-Camera has a little inertia this time. It would add to the realism if, when the camera plunged into the water, it's movement slowed dramatically. I was right about the need to make the surface transparent and I'm right about this.

[Drebbel]

I love the harbour shots. I guess it answers my Q elswhere in this forum. I was wondering if East Coast ports would be simulated.

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3661/9o787645vr4.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9591/789o545ov0.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/8127/689545wh6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/6506/7959857la2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/4713/46847847tv4.jpg

[Drebbel]

I know, some of them have been posted before in this thread, but look at them, they deserve a bump don't they :D

[Jimbuna]

I know, some of them have been posted before in this thread, but look at them, they deserve a bump don't they :D

Most definitely mate :rock: :up:

[Drebbel]

Here are some more screenies I did not see in this thread yet:

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6962/56u5e5475vq3.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8892/67885yc4.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/4830/454584uo5.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/7456/567346ck4.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/622/568966ne1.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/328/574577nr2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8827/684774dn7.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8016/686585dn0.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/9419/689867xy6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/7425/4574575yb2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/4531/4674677ap9.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/2074/5474577xu2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8873/5674767ex5.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8146/5784558sh2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/7109/5785475rl1.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/482/6474677lh3.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/2962/6585457iu8.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6575/9878655sh0.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/4836/45673477hw8.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/796/46744367ot7.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/5346/54854587jz9.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/7414/54857868vy9.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/7678/56746436fm8.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8441/65746757te6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/4293/65787457nv6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/3944/67863446vf1.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/4627/67985875vv8.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/6070/68967568eo2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/3635/78437676gx2.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/2294/467463463ko5.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/7147/467467477ta1.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/1847/567547457om7.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/3540/657656588lw4.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/1668/765879800bx1.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/7819/799054547jc5.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/69/5786456456gu6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/7685/6474674757fs0.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/9312/56874575767qm8.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8457/57853464636zb6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/835/76873434764bs9.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/378/467463644643iq7.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8908/dthrey5547fa8.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/9915/fjtu7ubc0.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/7481/jkhg65r65jb7.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/6238/khgukyt75fw6.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/7787/ryjhu5478vf7.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/4767/u547574ea1.jpg

[Drebbel]

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/3869/u655456uc4.jpg

[Drebbel]

The Enemy Wears Prada :lol:

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6697/768gte73434764bs9mm9.jpg

I love the details in the closing. they even wear straw hats !

[Drebbel]

:down:

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/9531/547547544577xu2vc7.jpg


I sure hope modders will change this awfull thingy into a more realistic chart pin/marker asap

[Konovalov]

The Enemy Wears Prada :lol:

http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6697/768gte73434764bs9mm9.jpg

I love the details in the closing. they even wear straw hats !

:rotfl: :rotfl:

You have been seriously busy posting screenies Drebbel. Thanks. :yep:

[Drebbel]

Yeah, so busy I could not check for spelling mistakes :D

[Drebbel]

Menu bars are modable :up:

http://silenthunter4.uk.ubi.com/images/image014.jpghttp://silenthunter4.uk.ubi.com/images/image016.jpg

[KrvKpt. Falke]

:down:

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/9531/547547544577xu2vc7.jpg


I sure hope modders will change this awfull thingy into a more realistic chart pin/marker asap



It looks like GTA:/ Go and harvest one hundred of cameras and you will win resistance to depth charges!!!:down::lol:

[WilhelmSchulz.]

Where did you get all these drebil??

[Sonarman]

It would be good if we had an option to not show those icons on the chart and had instead to note down the coordinates from the radio message and plot it ourselves.

[THE_MASK]

http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/6039/23127122uz7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6438/82551711vc5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/7315/18180881nw2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/2195/56197108qe4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Shaffer4]

http://fichas.hardgame2.net/fichas/silenthunter4:wolvesofthepacific/pc/album/17.jpg

Huh?:hmm:



If you watch the New Video on the Silent Hunter UK site, you can see this too, They are Shells/cannon fire

[hyperion2206]

http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/2195/56197108qe4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Did a plane explode above the ships or what caused the explosion up there?:o:hmm:

[THE_MASK]

Did a plane explode above the ships or what caused the explosion up there?:o:hmm:

I wondered also , must be a plane!!!

[flyingdane]

Nice pics guys thanks!

[Drebbel]

Where did you get all these drebil??

I just used google Wihmel, only for about 30 minutes and looked for SH4 related pages in Spanish and the French language.

[Jimbuna]

That's gotta be a plane...cos it sure as hell can't be a flying saucer :D

[Godalmighty83]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

[Drebbel]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Horrid HUD ? Where ?

[Ark]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

[Hackett]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

That's too funny. Y'all want to drive 1940's submersibles, but y'all want a 21st century looking interface.. :lol:

Seriously, it looks OK to me. it looks functional, and it's supposed to be editable. major plus in my books.

[Ark]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

That's too funny. Y'all want to drive 1940's submersibles, but y'all want a 21st century looking interface.. :lol:

Seriously, it looks OK to me. it looks functional, and it's supposed to be editable. major plus in my books.



Just becuase the submarines are from the 40's, doesn't mean the HUD has to be. lol

[Hackett]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

That's too funny. Y'all want to drive 1940's submersibles, but y'all want a 21st century looking interface.. :lol:

Seriously, it looks OK to me. it looks functional, and it's supposed to be editable. major plus in my books.



Just becuase the submarines are from the 40's, doesn't mean the HUD has to be. lol

Yeah! Hell! Lets have 3D Vista style HUD, with Star-Trek LCARS panels and MFD's :know:

[Godalmighty83]

well id prefer a hud that doesnt look like it was made by a 5-year old using a ruler and some assorted wee-coloured pastels. but if you want to pilot the enterprise thats up to you ;)

sh3's only needed a bit of tweaking, the new one looks like a step-back in quality and effort.

[Ark]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

That's too funny. Y'all want to drive 1940's submersibles, but y'all want a 21st century looking interface.. :lol:

Seriously, it looks OK to me. it looks functional, and it's supposed to be editable. major plus in my books.



Just becuase the submarines are from the 40's, doesn't mean the HUD has to be. lol

Yeah! Hell! Lets have 3D Vista style HUD, with Star-Trek LCARS panels and MFD's :know:


I never asked for a "modern" hud. The one currently in place just looks dated by todays standards workmanship wise. SH3's hud looks to be of a higher quality IMO.

Don't confuse "dated looking" with "I want the games hud to look like a space-sim". That would be an inaccurate assumption. I just think the current hud for SHIV looks like a panel from MSFS 98. lol ;)

[Hackett]

I didn't confuse or miss-understand anything. It was just sarcasm!

"You can please some of the people, some of the time, but you can't please all of the people, all of the time".

The dev's are on a tight accelerated schedule, (Whether you blame them or Ubisoft, I don't care.) and they still don't have time to put in things like wolfpacks, or even just simple AI submersibles, or other important features the community as a whole wants, but Ark wants a better quality artwork HUD... ( Just sarcasm nothing more.)

I'm sure the modding community will save the day, as they have done for the last two titles.

:ping:

[Iron Budokan]

I agree. I have a lot of faith in our modding community to fix whatever they CAN fix without having access to the hardcode. Those guys are awesome.... :rock:

[Godalmighty83]

The dev's are on a tight accelerated schedule,

:ping:

they could have saved a bit of time by not vandalising what already looked ok.

a definite step backwards in interface, looks like the layout for a megadrive sim game.

il stop moaning about this now....promise.

[LukeFF]

il stop moaning about this now....promise.

Thank you.

[THE_MASK]

well id prefer a hud that doesnt look like it was made by a 5-year old using a ruler and some assorted wee-coloured pastels. but if you want to pilot the enterprise thats up to you ;)

sh3's only needed a bit of tweaking, the new one looks like a step-back in quality and effort.

They are slideout anyway and hidden for most of the time .

[Sulikate]

I need more screenshots... I need them now!!!

[fire-fox]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

its not a HUD (Heads Up Display) there in the cockpits of military jet's and such.

its a GUI or Graphical User Interface.

[It762]

But to trust always in the community is not very good way. Of course a gmae can be greatly enhanced by the community but the stock game must be playable!

COmmunity mods are often overwhelming in numbers and a not to underestimating part of them breaks the balance or are causing new problems.

It is the JOB of the developers and the publisher to create a game that is in a playable state.

Let's see how they did their work with SH4 ;) But if it's unplayable I will not wait again for months to get patches.

[Ark]

nice graphics, horrid hud.

Agreed.

I'm not to keen on the HUD. It seems too "dated looking"...is that the term I'm looking for?

its not a HUD (Heads Up Display) there in the cockpits of military jet's and such.

its a GUI or Graphical User Interface.

I know what a HUD is on modern aircraft. lol What we are referring to in SHIV is still called the hud, like it is in most games. :)

Huds in videogames can be used to show quite a few game aspects, one of them being menus and whatot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HUD_(computer_gaming) ;)

[Periscope]

I need more screenshots... I need them now!!!
Just for you: :-P ;)
http://img.jeuxvideopc.com/images/screenshots/8925/gdf_wm/70_640.jpg
Click for full Image: http://www.jeuxvideopc.com/screenshots/8925-silent-hunter-4-wolves-of-the-pacific/image-70-1280x1024.php#image

I acutally don't know why some of you do not like the Interface. It seems to be clearly structured and the colors are also OK. I like it.
Anyway... Let's see how "customizable" it finally will be...:ping:

[Sulikate]

Thank you mate:arrgh!:































I need more!!!!!!!!!!!!:rock:

[Avatar]

This is in response to the Operation Petticoat post:
I think the US did paint their scopes pink, I remember reading that in one of Richard O'Kanes books. Pink is the hardest color to spot for the scopes.

[Drebbel]

This is in response to the Operation Petticoat post:
I think the US did paint their scopes pink, I remember reading that in one of Richard O'Kanes books. Pink is the hardest color to spot for the scopes.

During my Survival at Sea training I was told that Pink would be the best colour for life boats, I assume because that is the best colour to spot. But for unknown reasons ;) they are never painted that colour.:lol:

[Gino]

This is in response to the Operation Petticoat post:
I think the US did paint their scopes pink, I remember reading that in one of Richard O'Kanes books. Pink is the hardest color to spot for the scopes.

You're right!! :up:

Look at the example we have at the USS Cod

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/6915/pinkhn3.th.jpg (http://img221.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pinkhn3.jpg)

groetjes