View Full Version : Serious 1.03 Akula II Bug?
(if this has been posted before, my apologies because I couldn't find the thread)
So I was playing tonight, commanding the Akula II platform.
The host was running the stock version of the game with only the 1.03 patch and no other mods enabled.
I had six SS-N-27 ASW's loaded in my external tubes.
After firing tube 4, I expected an SS-N-27 ASW missile to emerge and travel to the top of the water.
Instead, a Type 40 torpedo that was colored yellow with black stripes emerges from the tube, immediately goes active, and starts it's circle route.
I was going 5 knots, and couldn't evade it when it finished it's circle and T-boned me for 100% damage.
This also happened to me earlier today in a different game.
This has to be a bug.
And just for those that will ask the obvious questions, let me clear them out right away:
I confirmed that I fired the number 4 external tube, which was also confirmed to have an SS-N-27 ASW loaded.
The torpedo that emerged was confirmed to be a yellow base with black stripes and has marks, which is a Type 40 torpedo.
However, the one piece of evidence that backs up my claim is that the Type 40 torpedo by itself is not selectable as an ordinance type in either the Akula II external or internal tubes.
The fact that it emerged from any of my tubes by itself is, according to the game, impossible.
Anyone else ever experience this?
What was the range did you pre-select? It could be that you left the 0 nmi on.
I think it was 1nm.
Honestly I can't remember if it was 1nm or 0nm though.
*edit*
After thinking hard about, the range WAS set for 0nm.
Logically, this is what SHOULD have happened if the range is set to 0nm for either an SS-N-27 ASW or an SS-N-16 Stallion:
The missile launches, travels to the ocean top, and flies straight up...reaching the peak of it's climb and starting back down again, releasing the Type 40/UMGT-1 torpedo in the approximate area of where it left the water.
Since this isn't what happened, there are only two explanations as to what really happened:
1. The SS-N-27 ASW missile casing lodged inside the external torpedo tube, and somehow the mechanism that triggers the release of the Type 40 torpedo was activated. With the casing stuck in the tube, the Type 40 launched directly from the missile casing.
This should have rendered the number 4 tube to be blocked with casing debris and unusable, but the indicator said EMPTY on the weapons control screen. =)
2. It's really a bug.
I once tried to launch with 0 nmi preset, and just this happened. I would not call this a bug, rather a small lack of realism.
Definately not a bug.
Yes the torp does appear straight away, but if you watch the 3D screen closly the capsule also gets discharged - hense the tube status says EMPTY.
As Orm said, its just a lack of realism thats all.
This is an outrage.
I demand a refund, plus a check from S.C.C to compensate for any counseling or therapy I may require as a result of the trauma I have suffered when subjected to this non-realism scenerio.
Kapitan
03-25-06, 08:42 AM
We are fixing the bugs sheesh give us time man some of us have been waiting since the game first came out be pacient.
Bellman
03-25-06, 09:35 AM
:lol: Goblin - we are recruiting more 'hands' down in the 'Bilges.' With your delicate irony you would be very..........
(well at least a little) welcome. :yep: ;) :D
We are fixing the bugs sheesh give us time man some of us have been waiting since the game first came out be pacient.
Warning!
Now turning *sarcasm* off!
:D
LuftWolf
03-25-06, 01:54 PM
The bug here is that the enable range on the fire control can be set to less than minimum indicated (database) range. When this happens... really unlikable stuff occurs.
To prevent this from happening, only use the 27ASW correctly, that is, with it's enable range set at over it's minimum range, which is 5nm in practice (based on it's ballistic tradjectory).
....To prevent this from happening, only use the 27ASW correctly, that is, with it's enable range set at over it's minimum range, which is 5nm in practice (based on it's ballistic tradjectory).
Only problem with this is that if you set to enable at 5 miles, it will enter the water at about 8 or 9 miles. Yes the torp does enable at the 5 mile point, but it take that long to re-enter the water.
Molon Labe
03-25-06, 05:25 PM
....To prevent this from happening, only use the 27ASW correctly, that is, with it's enable range set at over it's minimum range, which is 5nm in practice (based on it's ballistic tradjectory).
Only problem with this is that if you set to enable at 5 miles, it will enter the water at about 8 or 9 miles. Yes the torp does enable at the 5 mile point, but it take that long to re-enter the water.
That's only because the stock doctrines are busted.
There's a certain mod out there that fixes most the the fux0red doctrine and database problems. ;)
LuftWolf
03-25-06, 06:02 PM
....To prevent this from happening, only use the 27ASW correctly, that is, with it's enable range set at over it's minimum range, which is 5nm in practice (based on it's ballistic tradjectory).
Only problem with this is that if you set to enable at 5 miles, it will enter the water at about 8 or 9 miles. Yes the torp does enable at the 5 mile point, but it take that long to re-enter the water.
Thanks ML.
Ramius, it's been quite some time since I've thought about those problems (ie the one's the mod fixes easily).
I suppose that is not good form, considering I am a beta tester as well as a modder.
But you are absolutely right about the stock game being quite far off with torpedo entry points. :)
Yes, i know there is a mod that can help with these matters, but not everyone wishes to use the mod / can use it (for whatever reason) / even knows about its existance.
As LW has stated, being a tester and a modder has its downsides.
The two are hard to put together, especially if you test with a mod installed :nope: :nope:
Hense, i have no mods installed on my installation of DW.
LuftWolf
03-25-06, 06:34 PM
However, I can excuse myself mostly because I believe moddabilty to be an equally important feature of modern games as basic gameplay, graphics, and sound. :yep: :know:
And I actually want to play the best version of the game available, as that is the best test of its capability, and the best experience. :up:
Cheers,
David
So if I want to fire on a target 5nm away, I should set the range for 1nm, since entering in 5 would drop the torp 10nm away?
So if I want to fire on a target 5nm away, I should set the range for 1nm, since entering in 5 would drop the torp 10nm away?
Basically - yes.
TLAM Strike
03-25-06, 07:04 PM
So if I want to fire on a target 5nm away, I should set the range for 1nm, since entering in 5 would drop the torp 10nm away? LWAMI's mod fixed this BTW...
OneShot
03-25-06, 08:13 PM
I think JoGary made up a listing of the entered drop points and the resulting real drop points in the game some time back. Check around here and/or at the CADC in the subs tips&tricks ...
So if I want to fire on a target 5nm away, I should set the range for 1nm, since entering in 5 would drop the torp 10nm away? LWAMI's mod fixed this BTW...
Without any ballistic flight of the torpedo. Realistic?
LuftWolf
03-26-06, 05:40 AM
OMIGAWD does it really matter Orm??? :damn:
The torpedoes hit the water at the right point and the rockets don't just disappear anymore. I'm done with this (Amizaur is the one who did it by the way, we owe the credit for this improvement to him).
Anyway. Anyone else feel like nitpicking over something COMPLETELY unrelated to gameplay yet would take days to do exactly 100% ascethically perfect while so many things that matter go unfixed?
I made good money today, I'm feelin' frisky. :rock:
:lol: :-j
OMIGAWD does it really matter Orm??? :damn:
The torpedoes hit the water at the right point and the rockets don't just disappear anymore. I'm done with this (Amizaur is the one who did it by the way, we owe the credit for this improvement to him).
Anyway. Anyone else feel like nitpicking over something COMPLETELY unrelated to gameplay yet would take days to do exactly 100% ascethically perfect while so many things that matter go unfixed?
I made good money today, I'm feelin' frisky. :rock:
:lol: :-j
It was not a big critic. Only that when I used it the first time, I was somewhat surprise as I thought that the subroc infamous bug (the one when flying over ice or an island) had just reappeared. That was it. Peace. :sunny:
LuftWolf
03-26-06, 06:09 AM
Huh?
I guess I misunderstood you then, can you elaborate further if you have a chance? :hmm:
Didn't mean to be quick to the trigger. :)
Actually, can anyone elaborate on what he is refering to? I'm not sure what Orm is describing. :88)
Huh?
I guess I misunderstood you then, can you elaborate further if you have a chance? :hmm:
Didn't mean to be quick to the trigger. :)
Actually, can anyone elaborate on what he is refering to? I'm not sure what Orm is describing. :88)
I am not very sure if I have to take it as an insult or not.
Anyway, to the matter, I think you know that when launching on a ice map or if an island is between the launcher and the target, meaning that the subroc has to fly over the island (and should release its torpedo while still flying over the island), the missile had the bad habit to plunge directly to the sea without releasing any torpedo. Of course I am talking about stock DW.
Now, with your mod, I first thought when seeing the missile going straight to the sea and not releasing its torpedo that this bug was on. That’s all.
LuftWolf
03-26-06, 06:44 AM
Huh?
I guess I misunderstood you then, can you elaborate further if you have a chance? :hmm:
Didn't mean to be quick to the trigger. :)
Actually, can anyone elaborate on what he is refering to? I'm not sure what Orm is describing. :88)
I am not very sure if I have to take it as an insult or not.
Anyway, to the matter, I think you know that when launching on a ice map or if an island is between the launcher and the target, meaning that the subroc has to fly over the island (and should release its torpedo while still flying over the island), the missile had the bad habit to plunge directly to the sea without releasing any torpedo. Of course I am talking about stock DW.
Now, with your mod, I first thought when seeing the missile going straight to the sea and not releasing its torpedo that this bug was on. That’s all.
No insult.
I wanted a clear description of what was happening in case there was a new bug that I wasn't aware of.
Thank you for clearing it up. :)
Cheers,
David
No problem. :D
Perhaps a bad habit from me to think that everybody know what I am thinking. Sorry.
Huh?
I guess I misunderstood you then, can you elaborate further if you have a chance? :hmm:
Didn't mean to be quick to the trigger. :)
Actually, can anyone elaborate on what he is refering to? I'm not sure what Orm is describing. :88)
I am not very sure if I have to take it as an insult or not.
Anyway, to the matter, I think you know that when launching on a ice map or if an island is between the launcher and the target, meaning that the subroc has to fly over the island (and should release its torpedo while still flying over the island), the missile had the bad habit to plunge directly to the sea without releasing any torpedo. Of course I am talking about stock DW.
Now, with your mod, I first thought when seeing the missile going straight to the sea and not releasing its torpedo that this bug was on. That’s all.
That happened to me yesterday, but I was playing stock 1.03.
Strangely enough though, even though I saw the actual missile casing hit the water, the torpedo still emerged....almost as if the game lagged the animation of the torpedo releasing in mid-flight.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.