SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-20-07, 07:45 PM   #1
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default An SR-72 in the works?

Ten years after the Air Force retired the SR-71 spy plane, Lockheed Martin’s legendary Skunk Works appears to be back at work developing a new Mach-6 reconnaissance plane, sources said.
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/20...e_sr72_070617/
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 08:34 PM   #2
Onkel Neal
Born to Run Silent
 
Onkel Neal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Cougar Trap, Texas
Posts: 21,383
Downloads: 541
Uploads: 224


Default

4000 mph ... wow. But unmanned? Where's the fun in that?
Onkel Neal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 08:50 PM   #3
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Robotic's, taking the fun out of flying

Going that fast at that seed is going to be hard to achive, and to stay stealthy is going to be near impossible. I don't envy the aircraft designers!
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 09:01 PM   #4
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bookworm_020
Robotic's, taking the fun out of flying

Going that fast at that seed is going to be hard to achive, and to stay stealthy is going to be near impossible. I don't envy the aircraft designers!
But do you need to stay stealthy at a speed that is faster and higher than almost any SAM in existence out there anyway? :hmm:
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 09:07 PM   #5
Mush Martin
Eternal Patrol
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,398
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

assumably Scramjet and Unmanned , prior to SR71 they did a single
engine 3000 mph reconasaince drone.
It shows lineage with tacit blue I think
in the engine/body/tail config , Lifting body also, I think.

the suggestion of heat signature being problematic is interesting.
Diamond edges on a diamond shape might do. plus a cold air bypass
injection into the exhaust.

I think it may be detectable by a type of geo stationary sattelite and ground
station network of composite sensrs. in a Bi Static array.
__________________
RIP Mush



Tutorial
Mush Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 09:34 PM   #6
fatty
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,448
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCIP
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookworm_020
Robotic's, taking the fun out of flying

Going that fast at that seed is going to be hard to achive, and to stay stealthy is going to be near impossible. I don't envy the aircraft designers!
But do you need to stay stealthy at a speed that is faster and higher than almost any SAM in existence out there anyway? :hmm:
Sometimes we don't like to stir up diplomatic frustrations by allowing the specimens to know they're under the microscope
fatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 11:00 PM   #7
JSLTIGER
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Parkland, FL, USA
Posts: 1,437
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

OK...my only problem...if its so top-secret, how come we know about it?
__________________
Thor:
Intel Core i7 4770K|ASUS Z87Pro|32GB DDR3 RAM|11GB EVGA GeForce RTX 2080Ti Black|256GB Crucial M4 SSD+2TB WD HDD|4X LG BD-RE|32" Acer Predator Z321QU 165Hz G-Sync (2540x1440)|Logitech Z-323 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Pro

Explorer (MSI GL63 8RE-629 Laptop):
Intel Core i7 8750H|16GB DDR4 RAM|6GB GeForce GTX 1060|128GB SSD+1TB HDD|15.6" Widescreen (1920x1080)|Logitech R-20 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Home
JSLTIGER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 11:21 PM   #8
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Why dont they just develop a missile with the survelance equipment in? :hmm:

And didin't spy planes die in the age of the satalite?
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 12:26 AM   #9
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

:hmm: :hmm:

I see they've learnt some things from Aurora...that's looking good. Nice design!
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 12:40 AM   #10
ASWnut101
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Letum
Why dont they just develop a missile with the survelance equipment in? :hmm:

And didin't spy planes die in the age of the satalite?

To keep others from obtaining the technology you just launched at them, not to mention preventing a major global-thermonuclear war (seriously, one may think the missile is an incoming ICBM/SLBM and start a nuke fest).


And there is no substitute for the stealth of the aircraft. Satilites are watched by other satillites, ect.


***************

It just needs to be manned, though. That would be amazing to ride in.
__________________

ASWnut101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 10:14 AM   #11
Tronics
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0
Default

No spy planes did not die with the age of the 3 meter satelite resolution.

Satelites are great for getting the big picture, however the handful of super-awesome-mega-resolution satelites are constantly baing timeshared by almost all US agencies and the like.

When I was on my way out of Chairforce intel the baseline standard satelite resolution was about 9 feet (3 meters), now I hear that the new baseline is soon to be 6 feet (2 meters) with a a handful of super-awesome-mega-resolution satalites almost having a 2 foot margin now.

Soon they will get to under a foot which is nice because it can provide nice spiffy super high res (5+ Gigabyte) reconnisance images down to even counting the shingles on the roof of your house.

The only problem for this is that these satalites are the far minority in their fields and are constantly fought over by federal agencies and interdepartments due to their ovbious value.

Also when considering orbital satelites those have primetime windows of opportunity as they coast effortlessly over out heads about every 100 minutes or so which is usually the amount of time that it takes them to complete an orbit.

So there are times when big brother has to switch his glasses out to another pair as it rounds the bend over the horizon of the specified area.

So in short satelites are great for getting daily or even hourly updates on extremely high priority intel targets, however for continous survailence or more immediate options you turn to either drones, planes, and finally men.

Each one has a cost in both dectivity, time and risk.

With spyplanes usually the time to target time is very low due to their speed, however this speed also sometimes compromises their stealth if they are going to fly over a target with a even a 'semi-modern' radar defence/warning system, plus their potential lost cost is the highest.

Drones on the other hand usually have a moderate to long time until target depending on their deployment positions, however their small size and slowish speed usually make them stealthy enough to get to the target area mostly undetced and get a few minutes worth of constant survailence before they are noticed. They are moderately cheap and totally expendable. Most now carry a payload or are themselves a payload that can be used as an impromptu bomb if a good enough of atarget situation arises.

Men or more specifically recon specalists range from dedicated special forces recon units such as the USMC Force Recon to basic 1-2 man USAF Far Area Recon jump teams...they usually take the most time to get to a target, but potentially have the lowest risk of detection, however their cost is high, (more then the drone but less then the spyplane), because where as men are expendable experience is not.
Tronics is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 10:19 AM   #12
Letum
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: York - UK
Posts: 6,079
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

What a well written post!
thanks!
__________________
Letum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 01:39 PM   #13
tycho102
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,100
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon
:hmm: :hmm:
I see they've learnt some things from Aurora.
Refueling liquid methane is risky business and how difficult it is to run a pulse-jet at low altitudes and speeds.


SR-72 has a nice UAV design. I wonder if it is autonomous or semi-autonomous, because they'd better have a plan if EMP or a solar flare knocks out our satellites. I imagine the flight-profile is easy enough as long as it doesn't need refueling.
tycho102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 01:54 PM   #14
Heibges
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 1,633
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

How many of the Subcontractors are in Murtha's district?
__________________
U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface.

http://www.hackworth.com/
Heibges is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-07, 09:32 PM   #15
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heibges
How many of the Subcontractors are in Murtha's district?
Somehow I don't think that has anything to do with it. This time anyway.
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.