[REL] patSH3r - Reborn

[hauangua]

Hi Fader Berg
But old options.. For example "WO range estimation fix" are deleted?

[Fader_Berg]

Originally Posted by hauangua

Hi Fader Berg
But old options.. For example "WO range estimation fix" are deleted?

Yes. I didn't like that solution. It was horrible to play with. It made playing SH3 boring. I've been thinking about incorporate a little more clean and simple one, like hsies instead.

[hauangua]

Originally Posted by Fader_Berg

Yes. I didn't like that solution. It was horrible to play with. It made playing SH3 boring. I've been thinking about incorporate a little more clean and simple one, like hsies instead.

Thanks for you answer Fader Berg
This new patch is really beautiful!!!
And war room very good idea!!

[hauangua]

Maybe i wrong or my poor English is guilty,
Fader Berg can you post your 4616, 4620, 4912 and 4922 en_menu.txt?
this mine:
Where wrong?

4616=Nearest visual contact, bearing %03.0f° (%03.0f°), range %.0f
4620=Range to ship at %03.0f is %.0f meters
4912=Nearest sound contact, bearing %03.0f° (%03.0f°), range %.0f”
4922=Nearest warship sound contact, bearing %03.0f° (%03.0f°), range %.0f”

i do not read true bearing just my WO repeat relative bearing ,by periscope/Uzo bearing ...example 127° (127°)
i know this MY wrong but not understerand where

[Fader_Berg]

Originally Posted by hauangua

Maybe i wrong or my poor English is guilty,
Fader Berg can you post your 4616, 4620, 4912 and 4922 en_menu.txt?
this mine:
Where wrong?

4616=Nearest visual contact, bearing %03.0f° (%03.0f°), range %.0f
4620=Range to ship at %03.0f is %.0f meters
4912=Nearest sound contact, bearing %03.0f° (%03.0f°), range %.0f”
4922=Nearest warship sound contact, bearing %03.0f° (%03.0f°), range %.0f”

i do not read true bearing just my WO repeat relative bearing ,by periscope/Uzo bearing ...example 127° (127°)
i know this MY wrong but not understerand where

Those lines looks ok. It looks like the true bearings gets calculated too. Are you heading north?

[hauangua]

Originally Posted by Fader_Berg

Those lines looks ok. It looks like the true bearings gets calculated too. Are you heading north?

All work good Fader Berg.. I'm bit stupid... Eheheheh.. Yes probed very fast, academy torpedo.... My sub heading north... I'm sorry.

[Niume]

I have send the status report but i can't see it on the map.
My config
[PATSH3R]
AlertWatchOfficer=Yes
NightVisionFactor=0.45
RepairTimeFactor=25.0
SmarterPettyOfficers=Yes
Patsh3rBDU=Yes

[Blackswan1940]

Originally Posted by Fader_Berg

Yes. I didn't like that solution. It was horrible to play with. It made playing SH3 boring. I've been thinking about incorporate a little more clean and simple one, like hsies instead.

Ahaaa! And you should also consider taking back your last decision about rekoving the compatibilty to H.sie!

It is totally counterproductive when your patch is not compatible with Hasie and Stiebler. It will not be used then.

Hope this thought helps. Keep up your good work!

[Anvar1061]

Originally Posted by Blackswan1940

Ahaaa! And you should also consider taking back your last decision about rekoving the compatibilty to H.sie!

It is totally counterproductive when your patch is not compatible with Hasie and Stiebler. It will not be used then.

Hope this thought helps. Keep up your good work!

+1

[padi]

Originally Posted by Anvar1061

+1

+2

[Niume]

Originally Posted by padi

+2

+++3

[Tricky]

+4

[Fader_Berg]

Originally Posted by Blackswan1940

Ahaaa! And you should also consider taking back your last decision about rekoving the compatibilty to H.sie!

It is totally counterproductive when your patch is not compatible with Hasie and Stiebler. It will not be used then.

Hope this thought helps. Keep up your good work!

No, I should not. Look. Hsies code is horrible to work with. It's all over the place and he has made many poor design choices. It's too *******ing boring and time consuming to work with. Besides... I don't use many of his patches anyway.

Counterproductive...? I take that as an insult. Do you even know what that word mean? I may possibly have made something that you don't want to use. I use it though. That's pretty much all that matters for me. If any one else wants to use it - fine. If anyone else don't want to use it - perfect. I don't care.

I have given all the code away into the public domain for anyone to fiddle with and to merge with hsies work if that's wanted. How is that counterproductive?! Blame yourself or anyone else that have done nothing in this matter for being counterproductive instead.

D*mn I'm pissed... counterproductive my *ss.

[padi]

Originally Posted by Fader_Berg

No, I should not. Look. Hsies code is horrible to work with. It's all over the place and he has made many poor design choices. It's too *******ing boring and time consuming to work with. Besides... I don't use many of his patches anyway.

Counterproductive...? I take that as an insult. Do you even know what that word mean? I may possibly have made something that you don't want to use. I use it though. That's pretty much all that matters for me. If any one else wants to use it - fine. If anyone else don't want to use it - perfect. I don't care.

I have given all the code away into the public domain for any one to fiddle with and to merge with hsies work if that's wanted. How is that counterproductive?! Blame yourself or anyone else that have done nothing in this matter for being counterproductive instead.

D*mn I'm pissed... counterproductive my *ss.

Creating something that isn't compatible to the standard is counterproductive because very few people are using it...

[Fader_Berg]

Originally Posted by padi

Creating something that isn't compatible to the standard is counterproductive because very few people are using it...

The fact that it's created for a small audience (if any at all) doesn't make it counterproductive. I'm sorry.