SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM: The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Sub & Naval Discussions: News, Books, Films, and Models
Forget password? Reset here

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2017, 05:23 AM   #1
Onkel Neal
Born to Run Silent
Onkel Neal's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Cougar Trap, Texas
Posts: 17,115
Downloads: 389
Uploads: 195

radar How America's F-15 Fighter Almost Joined the US Navy (On an Aircraft Carrier)

How America's F-15 Fighter Almost Joined the US Navy (On an Aircraft Carrier)

Was the Sea Eagle a viable concept? The problem is the one that we are seeing with today's F-35: an aircraft that must serve more than one master inevitably sacrifices performance in some area (in fact, the F-14 was born after the Pentagon's abortive attempt to make the ill-fated F-111 a joint Air Force and navy fighter). To turn the F-15 into a carrier-based interceptor like the F-14 would have required so many design changes that the hybrid beast would probably have been inferior to either the F-15 or F-14.

Which points to the real problem: The Air Force and Navy have always had different requirements. In the 1970s, the Air Force wanted a powerful, highly maneuverable dogfighter to prevent a repeat of what happened when its F-4 Phantoms battled more nimble MiGs over Vietnam. Though ironically, the Air Force did at one point consider the F-14 as a replacement for the F-106 interceptor.

Onkel Neal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2017, 05:33 PM   #2
The Old Man
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,531
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0

We should still be building F-14s to this day.
Time to Dump the Tea in the Potomac
em2nought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2017, 05:29 AM   #3
Chief of the Boat
Jimbuna's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 126,302
Downloads: 49
Uploads: 11


Originally Posted by em2nought View Post
We should still be building F-14s to this day.
Yep, I believe the Iranians are desperately short of spare parts
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

GWX3.0 Download Page - Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim)
Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2017, 03:36 AM   #4
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,439
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


I mean Tomcat was a good air defense interceptor, with it's Phoenix long range air to air missiles.
Grumpy as always.
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2017, 06:22 PM   #5
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seneca, SC, USA
Posts: 242
Downloads: 44
Uploads: 0

This one for all concept is what concerns me about the F-35 in all it's versions.
CPU: Intel Core i7-860 Lynnfield 2.8GHz Quad-Core
Cooler: ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 7 Pro Rev.2
HD: W/D Caviar Black 640GB
Case: AZZA Solano 1000R Black/Red ATX Full Tower
ironkross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2017, 02:36 PM   #6
Ocean Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Too far from the sea...
Posts: 2,707
Downloads: 145
Uploads: 13


The Navy and Air Force list their own specific needs for an aircraft and all Congress sees/hears is "I need a plane to shoot down other planes and drop bombs." And that boys and girls is how the F-35 was born. Could argue the F-4 as well, and the F-111.

USS Kentucky SSBN 737 (G)
Comms Div 2003-2006
Qualified 19 November 03

Yes I was really on a submarine.
ETR3(SS) is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2018 Subsim