SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-16, 02:25 AM   #1
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,066
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default BB: 61,64,63,62

https://www.flickr.com/photos/konabish/6497548649/ <to enlarge) All four Iowa-class battleships steaming together (1954). Ship closest to the camera is USS Iowa (BB-61). The others are (from near to far): USS Wisconsin (BB-64), USS Missouri (BB-63) and USS New Jersey (BB-62). This was the only occasion that all four Iowa Class BB's were steaming in formation. Arguably; two years later...the most powerful surface armada the world ever saw.
Quote:
The final type of ammunition developed for the Iowa class were Katie" shells. These shells were born from the concept of nuclear deterrence that had begun to shape the United States armed forces as the Cold War began. To compete with the Air Force and Army, which had developed nuclear bombs and nuclear shells for use on the battlefield, the US Navy began a top-secret program to develop Mk. 23 nuclear naval shells with an estimated yield of 15 to 20 kilotons.These shells were designed to be launched from the best seaborne artillery platform available, which at the time were the four ships of the Iowa class. The shells entered development around 1953, and were reportedly ready by 1956; however, it is not known whether they were ever actually deployed on the Iowa-class battleships because the US Navy does not confirm or deny the presence of nuclear weapons aboard its ships. In 1991 the US unilaterally withdrew its nuclear artillery shells from service, and Russia responded in kind in 1992. The US removed around 1,300 nuclear shells from Europe and reportedly dismantled its last shells by 2003.This in theory would give each Iowa class Battleship capable of delivering 135-180 kilotons worth of explosives in one salvo. An unique capability that would have proved decisive in any conflict on sea or on land. The nuclear tests with the Mk-9 (11in Army shell) had the shell detonated as an aerial burst. The nuclear tests at the ABLE detonation showed an air burst detonation did little structural damage to battleships. It is unknown if the Mk-23 was designed to detonate on impact or under water which would most likely cause an explosion much like the BAKER nuclear test that caused considerably more damaged to the test fleet. Even with a single air burst detonation a Mk 23, it would have damaged or destroyed much of the enemy battleship fragile equipment it would need to fight if they survived the explosion. Thus leaving for any of the Iowa's easy pickings with their conventional 16in shells.
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-16, 11:04 AM   #2
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,066
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default ODDS and ends of interest; Some exceedingly Kool stuff

http://amp.rokket.biz/docs/vii_modifications.pdf @ ivanov.ruslan: thanks for this site; this is the really good stuff 'diehards' gotta have at ! Likewise Catfish: magnificent post: http://www.tvre.org/en/aiming-with-the-periscope http://militaryhistory.x10.mx/shippictures/warshippictures/articles/Type%20VII%20cutaway.jpg http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-570/U-570GeneralPlanDavidTaylorHR.htm @ Mr Baker THANKS: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?p=2431601#post2431601
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!

Last edited by Aktungbby; 10-01-16 at 09:48 AM.
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-16, 02:30 PM   #3
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,066
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default Too much history to let Slide:

http://napavalleyregister.com/news/local/mare-island-transition-stirs-memories-for-napa-man/article_3d2f9c44-11e6-5eca-8d8d-5fcfb2b7abd1.html Where I sail frequently: The Napa River's a little calmer than the Bay! Five of the top scoring seven submarines of WWII were built at Mare Island <USS Wahoo SS 238-launched & off off Mare Island Where I've the privilege of sailing (key to enlarge to show bridges and Mare Island to my port side>-not the same Carquinez Bridge span (the one to the left of Wahoo is the 1927 span) replaced by the 1958 cantilever and then the 2003 Zampa's suspension bridge: I-80's horrific transit to the south Bay area. The bridge is named for Al Zampa, an iron worker who worked on the 1927 span and the Golden Gate Bridge He is most notable for being one of the first people to survive falling off the Golden Gate Bridge. He was a charter member of the Half Way to Hell Club, whose members are the men who fell from the Golden Gate Bridge and were saved by the nets. What a way to get a bridge named after U!
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-18, 06:28 PM   #4
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,066
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


cool SAILS AIN'T CHEAP BBY!

> THINGS TO PONDER WHEN 'ASEA' < I SHOULD FLY THE 'J' FLAG ALL THE TIME WITH 150% JIB SEEN FULLY UNFURLED IN FOTO-USUALLY IT'S TOO WINDY AND IS USUALLY ONLY AT 100%...ie not past the STEEL WIRE MAST-STAYS TO PREVENT WEAR FROM TACKING IN 15 MPH+ WINDS...
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.