Casablanca Mission.

EmeAzul · 05-30-20, 12:28 PM

Sorry guys, that was my mistake. You are absolutely right that both of the LBB24Liberators in the Casablanca mission should be Type 302. The original mission from April 2005 which I attempted to make GWX-compliant last December had differences with the FFRiverClass name (not DERiver) and type 2 (not 3), the CBBunkerMedium type 408 (not 403) and the LBB24Liberator type 302 (not 301). I must have overlooked that last one.

I'm in the process of double-checking all of the Single Missions I have collected, to make sure they are in fact totally GWX-compliant. This as you may know, entails checking on every Air, Land, Sea and Submarine unit for the GWX correct Class Names, Types, Country Origin and Dates of availability for that Country. With over 300 some Single missions now, this is going to take awhile. Cheers

05-30-20, 12:28 PM	#10
EmeAzul US Navy LT Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Bay Area, California Posts: 119 Downloads: 582 Uploads: 0	My Mistake on Casablanca Sorry guys, that was my mistake. You are absolutely right that both of the LBB24Liberators in the Casablanca mission should be Type 302. The original mission from April 2005 which I attempted to make GWX-compliant last December had differences with the FFRiverClass name (not DERiver) and type 2 (not 3), the CBBunkerMedium type 408 (not 403) and the LBB24Liberator type 302 (not 301). I must have overlooked that last one. I'm in the process of double-checking all of the Single Missions I have collected, to make sure they are in fact totally GWX-compliant. This as you may know, entails checking on every Air, Land, Sea and Submarine unit for the GWX correct Class Names, Types, Country Origin and Dates of availability for that Country. With over 300 some Single missions now, this is going to take awhile. Cheers Last edited by EmeAzul; 06-01-20 at 09:45 AM.