SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Sub/Naval + Other Games > Sub/Naval & General Games Discussion > Jutland
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-09, 12:16 PM   #1
jdkbph
Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 0
Default DG1.5 - the opening attack

So has anyone ever been able to achieve near historical results or better?... at least major damage to several Russian units with no (or very few) losses on the Japanese side?

If so, how?

Every time I run this opening battle the IJN attackers get hammered.

JD
jdkbph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-09, 06:43 PM   #2
jdkbph
Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 0
Default

Wow! Nobody playing this?
jdkbph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-09, 01:02 AM   #3
PeriscopeDepth
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,894
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
Default

I personally never play the campaigns with the opening attack as the results have always been too extreme for my tastes as well.

PD
PeriscopeDepth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-09, 05:21 PM   #4
jdkbph
Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 0
Default

I guess the problem I'm having has to do with reconciling the idea of a sneak attack with the coordinated and aggressive response from the Russians.... as if they were prepared for it but perhaps just didn't know the exact time and place.

I wonder if there's any sort of provision in the game for "strategic surprise" as I've seen in some other games. I am taking the "GQ sounded - ready in X minutes" thing into account, but I don't think that adequately covers this particular scenario.

I've thought about skipping this part and going straight to the historical campaign, but i didn't want to miss out on that second battle (Chemulpo)

JD
jdkbph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-09, 11:14 AM   #5
alexsmith
Loader
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 81
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

When I play for Russians, I usually lost only Pallada through first jap attack - I know guys who were able to save it too. As Japanese I drowned four or five lights cruisers - which is far enough to win the complete game.

Yet I didn't try to play for Japanese in 1.5 - not finished Russian company - so can't say. Still think this is quite similar...
alexsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-09, 12:07 PM   #6
jdkbph
Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 508
Downloads: 104
Uploads: 0
Default

Can you say how you managed that result playing the IJN side?

For instance...

Did you maintain the default headings and keep the speed low (10 knots I think) to avoid detection, or speed up to close the range more quickly?

Did you maintain the starting formations and relative positions or did you manuever your divisions independently? If the latter, what did you do?

How close did you approach before turning to open the arcs for your torpedo tubes? At what range did you actually launch torpedoes?

Did you rely on the standard "torpedo free" order for the entire force, or did you issue specific targeting orders?

Thanks in advance....

JD
jdkbph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-09, 12:51 PM   #7
alexsmith
Loader
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 81
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Again - my experience in torpedding Russian ship is only from 1.0 version - don't know how it would be in 1.5

But in 1.0 I didn't find any difficulties to hit immovable ship - even from margin distance. Sometimes more save/load tactics help Especially when your dumb miners don't throw torpedoes as expected - look at this like at the bug

Can your please tell - what is going wrong when you play? You can't get close enough to release torpedoes? Or they miss? Or what? Hitting a moving defending ship with torpedo is sometimes a complex task - but stalled ship should be easy targets, shouldn't they?

I usually target every DD individually - as they are not smart enough to attack in division. The point is to track target in fire range for a some time - to allow miners to prepare torpedoes. And the other problem - despite that they miss too often - you may push an enemy ship with 4 or 5 torpedoes none of which is exploding or leaves too less damage. In this situation save/load often helps
alexsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-09, 03:50 PM   #8
mike_espo
Sonar Guy
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago, USA
Posts: 396
Downloads: 12
Uploads: 0
Default

I remember playing this scenario a few years ago. The Japs with their TBD attack. Playing the Russians, I lost a cruiser and one BB was damaged for a couple of months. I think this was historic.
mike_espo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-09, 10:54 AM   #9
Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wakefield, LA
Posts: 284
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

This is a tough scenario for the IJN. The problem is that if you get in close enough to launch torps, or if you hang around to lauch a lot of torps, you're going to lose some or many DDs. The historical results of only 3 hits and no IJN losses was, IIRC, due to the Russians waking up and shooting furiously, which made most of the IJN DDs stay too far away to hit anything, but most of them weren't hit, either. I could be wrong, but I think the only IJN torp hits came early on, while they still had at least some surprise.

The key to this battle is how long it takes the Russians to spot the IJN. The Russians only sound GQ and start counting down their surprise timers AFTER 1 ship spots an IJN DD. Thus, the closer the IJN can get before being spotted, the better for them.

An important part of remaining invisible is the speed of the IJN DDs. The faster they go, they easier they are to see. Coal-burning DDs and TBs of their era had very short funnels so at high power they had a lot of incomplete combustion in the boilers. This hot, unburned gas would burst into flames as it left the funnel, lighting up the ship. This is why the IJN DDs start out at slow speed, and why the AI keeps them slow until they're spotted.

Being end-on to the enemy also makes you harder to see. So when I play the IJN, what I normally do is turn the flotillas in succession parallel to the Russian line, then turn them together to make the approach at 10 knots or even 8 in line abreast. Once I get about 1200m from the Russians (assuming I haven't yet been spotted), I turn them all together back parallel to the Russians, launch, then turn together and withdraw while accelerating to top speed. This allows all the DDs to start running away at once instead of the tail-end charlies being stuck in murder range while the leaders run. And of course each DD can launch at a different Russian.

The important targets for the IJN are the cruisers on the outer, most vulnerable row: Askold, Boyarin, and Novik. Sinking Russian BBs and the slower cruisers isn't very important in this battle because your main units can usually deal with them. If you go for the Russian BBs, you're going to lose most of your DDs because you have to get in deep and won't be able to get out before you start taking lots of fire.

However, even sinking the Russian cruisers isn't THAT critical at this stage, and isn't worth losing a lot of DDs over. So if the Russians spot you early on the way in, just break off the attack and go home without launching.
__________________
-Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria
Bullethead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-09, 05:55 PM   #10
alexsmith
Loader
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 81
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullethead View Post
However, even sinking the Russian cruisers isn't THAT critical at this stage, and isn't worth losing a lot of DDs over. So if the Russians spot you early on the way in, just break off the attack and go home without launching.
Let me please disagree with you The more light cruisers Japan could sink during the first surprise attack - the more easily they can win! Because hunting down fast light cruisers is most vital task for IJN to win whole campaing. If most of the Russian cruisers speeding more than 20 knots are destroyed - the goal is achieved - because other's may be beaten almost easily with major IJN BB forces. And what to DD's - I actually see no point to save them at all - never they will be helpful during the game after first attack. Sink down full prepared cruiser even in a night attack is a trick - I think Also don't forget than your DD's dont' always throw torpedoes when you may expect...
alexsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-09, 08:10 PM   #11
Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wakefield, LA
Posts: 284
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexsmith View Post
Let me please disagree with you The more light cruisers Japan could sink during the first surprise attack - the more easily they can win!
Quite true. However, sometimes easy isn't as fun as challenging, it takes a long time for PA to fall even with total command of the seas, and I find DDs quite useful for many tasks. For instance, they're among the few IJN units that can lay mines. Besides, you never know when a big fleet action is going to go haywire on you, and then you need your DDs to stave off pursuit. 2PacRon is coming, regardless of what happens to PA. So, when I play the IJN, given the choice, I'll conserve my DDs and have to sweat out hunting down the Russian cruisers while waiting for PA to fall.
__________________
-Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria
Bullethead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-09, 04:59 AM   #12
alexsmith
Loader
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 81
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullethead View Post
I'll conserve my DDs and have to sweat out hunting down the Russian cruisers while waiting for PA to fall.
You hunt down cruisers with DDs??? You ARE able to pull DD against a full functional cruiser not to be killed? And your DDs always throw torpedoes, and torpedoes do explode and do damage to a cruiser?

In 1.5 I only used DDs once - when fighting Chin-Yen with friends by my BBs. In a later stage when enemy ships were almost all heavy I tried to attack them by eight DDs. At closer range, at low speed, on following course - I could not force either of DD to throw torpedo at all! Neither with Torpedo target ship nor with Torpedo target free. They probably decided they don't need to fire when enemy is almost finished - what an AI!

In my humble opinion instead of making distinct torpedo controls (which by the way probably is quite usefull in Jutland but absolutely useless in DG) there would be great if only one more button appeared - Hold torpedoes. Which means - aim and target but not release untill order. Now when DG is on the Jutland's engine - it possibly became more "jutlandic" than it should be

Last edited by alexsmith; 06-30-09 at 05:12 AM.
alexsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-09, 10:05 AM   #13
Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wakefield, LA
Posts: 284
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexsmith View Post
You hunt down cruisers with DDs???
No. My DDs mostly fill the Port Arthur area up with mines and kill off the raiding Russian DDs, which my cruisers usually can't catch. They also screen my BBs from Russian DDs and finish off cripples in fleet battles. All in all, I find them very useful and hate to lose any of them.

I will throw TBs at Russian cruisers, provided I can attack from head-on. The IJN has so many TBs that you can afford to lose a lot of them, which is what usually happens. I've had some success this way, too. One time I charged Askold and Novik with 8 TBs and sunk both of them for the loss of 4 TBs. A good trade, I say .

Quote:
I could not force either of DD to throw torpedo at all! Neither with Torpedo target ship nor with Torpedo target free. They probably decided they don't need to fire when enemy is almost finished - what an AI!
What was the sea condition? DDs are very low, and if waves are washing over their decks, they're unable to fire their torpedos. It doesn't take much water to make this happen, and the problem wasn't really solved until they started building bigger DDs with raised forecastle decks. RJW-vintage DDs are just large versions of TBs.

Quote:
In my humble opinion instead of making distinct torpedo controls (which by the way probably is quite usefull in Jutland but absolutely useless in DG) there would be great if only one more button appeared - Hold torpedoes. Which means - aim and target but not release untill order. Now when DG is on the Jutland's engine - it possibly became more "jutlandic" than it should be
Why do you say that being able to aim a ship's torps at a specific target is useless in DG? It works fine for me and I find it quite useful.
__________________
-Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria
Bullethead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-09, 10:53 AM   #14
alexsmith
Loader
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 81
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullethead View Post
What was the sea condition? DDs are very low, and if waves are washing over their decks, they're unable to fire their torpedos. It doesn't take much water to make this happen, and the problem wasn't really solved until they started building bigger DDs with raised forecastle decks. RJW-vintage DDs are just large versions of TBs.
maybe. I could probably miss it. Don't you think a some on-screen icon displaying aproximately weather conditions would be great?

Quote:
Why do you say that being able to aim a ship's torps at a specific target is useless in DG? It works fine for me and I find it quite useful.
I mean SEPARATE targeting! I doubt I can find any reasonable situation in which guns should fire in one direction and torpedoes opposite! In DG I mean - in Jutland as I've already told it may be quite reasonable - maybe.

Considering fact that sometimes torpedo targeting commands does not work at all - I order to target specific ship, but target is changed suddenly - please, check this out, might be bug And of course - I understand how visibility affects targeting - so please - do not send me back to manual

All I want to say that separate targeting is complex but does not solve the main (IMHO) problem - shooting from margin distance. When DD enters targeting range - it should prepare weapons to be ready to launch torpedoes by order - but not to throw them from 1km! To achive this you must do a lots of tricky things - target only from short distance and wait untill torpedoes train to target - which is sometimes too dangerous - or stop targeting just before launch - and target again at short distance - or do a lot of tricky manoeuvres... These all are toooo complex - especially when you attack by several DD at the same time. All is required - as I think - is a button Hold torpedoes/Release torpedoes - and DD might become quite helpful when they start to launch torpedoes just when YOU want it - not they
alexsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-09, 12:40 PM   #15
Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wakefield, LA
Posts: 284
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexsmith View Post
maybe. I could probably miss it. Don't you think a some on-screen icon displaying aproximately weather conditions would be great?
There is one. One of the buttons along the right edge of the screen is the weather report. This gives the wind speed and direction, the wave height, etc.

Quote:
I mean SEPARATE targeting! I doubt I can find any reasonable situation in which guns should fire in one direction and torpedoes opposite! In DG I mean - in Jutland as I've already told it may be quite reasonable - maybe.
This is quite useful in DG, too. It's a question of geometry. Suppose your DD is going parallel to an enemy line. The best gun target is the one on the broadside directly across from the DD. However, the best torpedo target is the ship next astern of the gun target, due to torpedoes having to lead the target a lot due to their slow speed.

Quote:
Considering fact that sometimes torpedo targeting commands does not work at all - I order to target specific ship, but target is changed suddenly - please, check this out, might be bug
The reason that your ship changes her torpedo target is because you gave it a target that was impossible to hit, and which will never apparently become possible to hit. The ship knows, however, that you want it to launch torpedoes and that it probably won't live much longer, so it picks a target it CAN hit, viewing torpedoes as a "use them or lose them" thing.

Assuming the water is calm enough, getting torpedoes to launch requires that you meet their launch parameters. These are:
  • The predicted impact point (not the target itself) is within the tube's arc of fire at the moment of launch.
  • The predicted impact point (not the target itself) is within the torpedo's range at the moment of launch.
If the launch parameters are not met when you give your ship a specific torpedo target, she will track that target for a little while to see whether the parameters will ever be met. If so, then your ship will continue to track that target and will launch when the parameters are met but subsequent movement of both your ship and the target. OTOH, if these conditions will apparently never be met, the ship will sometimes switch to a different target where the launch parameters ARE met, under the assumption that you want to launch torpedoes and hitting something else is better than being sunk before launching at all. If there's no other parameter-meeting target available, then your ship won't launch at all.

Torpedoes of the RJW only have ranges of 800-1200m. As such, they are unable to reach moving targets when fired from very much behind the target's beam. Remember, they have to end up somewhere ahead of where the target is now, and the further behind the target you are when you launch, the further ahead the impact point will be. Also, the further behind the target's beam you are, the closer to the target you have to be before you can launch.

The best way to use torpedoes, therefore, is to approach the target on a parallel but opposite course. In fact, this is the only approach I ever make on a moving target, because it also minimizes my exposure to enemy fire, both in terms of range and time spent under fire before I can launch. Plus, the torps arrive at the best angle and have the best chance of hitting when fired from ahead of the target.

What I like to do is have my DDs move in line astern more or less perpendicular to the target's course, then turn simultaneously for a head-on approach. This puts some of the flotilla on both sides of the target, leaving it no place to run when it tries to dodge the torpedoes .

Quote:
When DD enters targeting range - it should prepare weapons to be ready to launch torpedoes by order - but not to throw them from 1km!
You just need to work on the timing of giving the launch order. Only give it as the DDs are approaching the point you want to launch from, so that by the times the tubes swing onto the target, you're in the right place. It's not that hard to do.
__________________
-Bullethead
Storm Eagle Studios
In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria
Bullethead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.