SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Sub & Naval Discussions: World Naval News, Books, & Films
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-14, 01:47 PM   #106
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Err do they exist in plans at least? I mean weren't visbys going through the helicopter capability upgrade as recently as 2012?

Also I think you still have issue with arty, so my guess is that the budget cuts haven't been merciful on anyone.

P.s. what is the point in visby if the only ASW weapon it has is 400mm tubes?
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 02:10 PM   #107
Mr Quatro
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,772
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc View Post
She is, there are however a big advantage in using a Helicopter for ASW than a boat, like the Visby.

A sub can't hear the helicopter, not before the sonarbouy starts to binging(or what it is called) A ship can be heard, even if it doesn't go fast.

Markus
If the reports of coming to the surface for air and or charging batteries are true then it can't be a nuclear submarine.

as for ASW helicopters or patrol planes ... a submarine can hear low flying aircraft depending on the depth of the sub. American subs have hindsight sonar on a scope to listen to the baffles.

This whole thing should be awake up call for Sweden to get serious about ASW.

Don't the Swedish have subs that can take a quick search around?
Mr Quatro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 02:44 PM   #108
mapuc
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 17,901
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Quatro View Post
If the reports of coming to the surface for air and or charging batteries are true then it can't be a nuclear submarine.

as for ASW helicopters or patrol planes ... a submarine can hear low flying aircraft depending on the depth of the sub. American subs have hindsight sonar on a scope to listen to the baffles.

This whole thing should be awake up call for Sweden to get serious about ASW.

Don't the Swedish have subs that can take a quick search around?

True, when a helicopter get lower the rotor makes "pressure" on the water which can be heard(If I remember it correctly)
The Swedish Navy know this and therefor they got only so and so low before they lowered the sonarbouy.

It is a wake-up call for the Swedish politician.

Have read some chat questions and answer from some expert.

few of these question was "Is Russia preparing to invade Sweden?"
The expert: No

My thought about all this

If it is a Russian sub, it is there for two reasons

1. Replace old equipment
2. Testing the Swedish navy's ASW-possibility

I guess it is number 1, ´cause this sub got into trouble and now it try to escape into international waters, where this Ns Concord await.

Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 03:47 PM   #109
mapuc
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 17,901
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

"Russian main transmitter may have started operation"

This is one of the headlines on aftonbladet.se(Swedish news paper)

a very interesting article.

Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 03:50 PM   #110
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Would you care to provide a quick overview of this article then? That would be most interesting to read
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 04:07 PM   #111
mapuc
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 17,901
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikalugin View Post
Would you care to provide a quick overview of this article then? That would be most interesting to read
Ohh sorry

Used google translate

"A military Combat Boat ran on a Russian head transmitter that floated to the surface.

It should have been the starting point for the entire operation Armed Forces now engaged in the Stockholm archipelago, according to an unverified source.

- This is credible and reasonable tasks, says Göran Frisk retired commodore and former submarine hunter.

Last Friday, a Combat Boat from the Armed Forces have been driving on an object in the Stockholm archipelago, a form of Russian main transmitter, which have been stuck under water, detached and floated to the surface, according to a source.

This information is not verified, but so interesting and informed that they are not going to overlook.

- It was a Combat Boat 90 which collided with what they first thought was a submarine, but later turned out to be a fixed installation that cut through and floated to the surface in the Stockholm archipelago, said Aftonbladet source to reporter John Stambro.

The object that will be half a meter in diameter, roughly, is taken care of and are now in a military area.

This should have been found on Friday, and was the start of the operation to the Armed Forces announced that it is carrying out in the Stockholm archipelago.
a source.

The hunt is about transmitters
According to Aftonbladet source, it is mainly more Russian transmitter sought on the sea floor right now.

Yesterday was cordoned an area at the entrance to Nynashamn, next Nåttarö, of the civilians. No one was allowed to approach more than 10,000 feet for several hours. From a distance they looked big three corvettes HMS Visby, Sundsvall and Stockholm, and according to Aftonbladet source, the Armed Forces at the time to have made several discoveries of Russian transmitter.

The source says that the search also affects mini-submarines and military personnel, but that the primary race is about transmitters.

Göran Frisk retired commodore and former submarine hunter, saying that the information is credible. The Russian emergency signal that Swedish Dagbladet last weekend stated to have been sent on Thursday could from just such Russian transmitters according to Aftonbladet found in the archipelago

- These communication buoys attached to submarines. They send coded signals to satellites about everything from diesel fuel leakage, fuel problems and Spetsnazförband. The Russian military system is very centrally controlled, the Russians systematically communicate between each other, says Göran Frisk.

"Driving on a light buoy"
The likelihood is great that the three observations Armed Forces assessed as credible evidence of foreign underwater operations during Sunday's press conference is about both Russian transmitter - and the submarine image as "Erik", 27, took the south of Jungfrufjärden Göran Frisk believe

- Then one begins this kind of operation Have communications buoys been torn off it is hard for the submarine right now.

Supreme Commander Sverker Goranson says that data as far as he knows is wrong.

- I know you hit a light buoy, something else I do not know, so I do not know where it comes from, he says.

Have you driven on any installation that are not Swedish?
- I do not want to go into what we found or reports we receive in detail. Therefore, we must content ourselves with the presentation we had. For operational security reasons, we keep things to ourselves. "

Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 04:19 PM   #112
Type941
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U-52
Posts: 1,270
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

So basically Russian boat was towing/replacing some spying equipment, **** went south, Swedes saw it and trying to find it, and Russians put ships nearby to grab it too but looks like it's a goner and Swedes have it.

is that the TLR version of Swedish article?
__________________

Sink the Bismarck SH3 Movie
Type941 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-14, 04:26 PM   #113
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Could it be that some old Intel gathering equipment was faulty and left the sea bed? And thus wiped the Swedes into searching for more of those?
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 05:43 AM   #114
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 181,240
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Gets me wondering just how poorly prepared and equipped some NATO members are for similar eventualities.

Granted, Sweden is not a member and hardly has much if any past history this century as being anything other than a neutral.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!


GWX3.0 Download Page - Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim)
Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 06:36 AM   #115
daft
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 493
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikalugin View Post
Could it be that some old Intel gathering equipment was faulty and left the sea bed? And thus wiped the Swedes into searching for more of those?
Could be, but intelligence gathering equipment like that is rarely designed to float to the surface. But I don't know.

The Defence Forces called an extra press conference at 1300 today which got speculation going. Turns out, they just wantef to say that some of the ships will now anchor at Berga for maintenance and repairs while a small contingent remains at sea. They call this a new phase. To me it feels like a clear indication the reported observations has turned up nothing and that it is now time to scale back and then call off the operation.
__________________
And God said: \"Let there be Narrowband!\"
daft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 06:39 AM   #116
daft
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 493
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna View Post
Gets me wondering just how poorly prepared and equipped some NATO members are for similar eventualities.

Granted, Sweden is not a member and hardly has much if any past history this century as being anything other than a neutral.
The waters in the archipelago are really difficult to search in. A small submersible with enough endurance can hide on the bottom in cracks and crevices and remain virtually undetectable. If then manages to move to areas already searched it becomes even more difficult. I suspect that both passive and active sonar gives a lot of clutter, and the murky waters make visual inspections with ROVs difficult as well.
__________________
And God said: \"Let there be Narrowband!\"
daft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 11:11 AM   #117
daft
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 493
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Ok, some of the ships that anchored at Berga earlier today are on the move again. A naval spokesperson said that time is on our side. Our adversary can't stay below forever, sooner or later they need to pop up to breathe. Suddenly it sounds like the navy is confident they have whatever it is contained and it's now just a matter of waiting it out, hence the corvettes moving back to base. This is all speculation on my part, and 99% likely to be wrong. It would however fit if the sub started to make move now that darkness has fallen.
__________________
And God said: \"Let there be Narrowband!\"
daft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 12:04 PM   #118
ikalugin
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 3,212
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daft View Post
Could be, but intelligence gathering equipment like that is rarely designed to float to the surface. But I don't know.

The Defence Forces called an extra press conference at 1300 today which got speculation going. Turns out, they just wantef to say that some of the ships will now anchor at Berga for maintenance and repairs while a small contingent remains at sea. They call this a new phase. To me it feels like a clear indication the reported observations has turned up nothing and that it is now time to scale back and then call off the operation.
I was talking about anchored equipment and the archor breaking.
ikalugin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 12:45 PM   #119
daft
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 493
Downloads: 15
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikalugin View Post
I was talking about anchored equipment and the archor breaking.
Indeed, could very well be.
__________________
And God said: \"Let there be Narrowband!\"
daft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-14, 01:23 PM   #120
mapuc
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 17,901
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna View Post
Gets me wondering just how poorly prepared and equipped some NATO members are for similar eventualities.
If I remember correctly it looks very bad.

I in some exercises where Sweden where the hunted(Sub) the ships from NATO(USA, Netherland, England, Canada and some more) couldn't find it. When they was chasing subs from England, they found it, but with huge problems.
(by the way, in one execise from 2004 the Swedish Sub was disqualified not for cheating, it was for not being found-Heard that from a friend)


Edit. In exercises where Sweden was one of the hunter, the Swedish ship found the Sub almost immediately(that is until 2005, from thereon I have no clue how the execises have been going on for us the Swede)
Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.