Video emerges of Minneapolis police killing a citizen - - Riots

[u crank]

Originally Posted by Catfish

"That will show 'em"? Noted. No surprise here by the way.

He said 'show for' as in 'play for', not show 'em'.

[August]

Originally Posted by Catfish

"That will show 'em"? Noted. No surprise here by the way.

Obviously I meant I hoped that the You tube video will show. Isn't there a problem with certain You Tube videos not displaying overseas? But if you want to feel aggrieved then its no skin off my nose. I'm just glad to see justice served.

[Catfish]

Seems i misunderstood, video showing perfectly. It just sounded like a revenge or something – sry, my fault.
edit: Thanks for posting.

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by August

I'm just glad to see justice served.

Could the verdict been otherwise than not guilty, what do you say.

Furthermore can the prosecutor appeal the verdict to a higher court ?

Markus

[3catcircus]

Originally Posted by August

Obviously I meant I hoped that the You tube video will show. Isn't there a problem with certain You Tube videos not displaying overseas? But if you want to feel aggrieved then its no skin off my nose. I'm just glad to see justice served.

Now let's hope that two things happen:

1. Kyle sues every last scumbag in the media, as well as Biden and various other pols and celebrities who tried and convicted him in the court of public opinion and that he wins every trial.

2. Rioters try to FAFO tonight and the national guard kills every last one of them.

[mapuc]

FAFO ?

Markus

[3catcircus]

Originally Posted by mapuc

Could the verdict been otherwise than not guilty, what do you say.

Furthermore can the prosecutor appeal the verdict to a higher court ?

Markus

The only way it could have been guilty is if the jury failed in their duty. This case, when you look at the actual evidence and testimony rather than social media posts or new reports, is cut and dried completely self defense.

The prosecution can not appeal not guilty verdicts - you can't be tried twice for the same crimes that you've been accused of. The prosecutors have bigger worries about whether or not they'll be disbarred or see inside a jail cell. The two things you NEVER do as a prosecutor (claim the defendant is guilty for exercising his 5th amendment or his Miranda rights and withholding exculpatory evidence) - these prosecutors did - willfully and with malice.

[3catcircus]

Originally Posted by mapuc

FAFO ?

Markus

F$&@ Around and Find Out. An exhortation daring criminal rioters to attempt criminal acts against people who are armed and dangerous.

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by 3catcircus

Three only way it could have been guilty is if the jury failed in their duty. This case, when you look at the actual evidence and testimony rather than social media posts or new reports, is cut and dried completely self defense.

The prosecution can not appeal not guilty verdicts - you can't be tried twice for the same crimes that you've been accused of. Three prosecutors have bigger worries about whether or not they'll be disbarred or see inside a jail cell. The two things you NEVER do as a prosecutor (claim the defendant is guilty for exercising his 5th amendment or his Miranda rights and withholding exculpatory evidence) - these prosecutors did - willfully and with malice.

Thank you for the answer. It clearly show me that my knowledge about American law is insufficient.

Here a prosecutor can appeal a verdict. Which happens often.

Markus

[Buddahaid]

Originally Posted by 3catcircus

Now let's hope that two things happen:

1. Kyle sues every last scumbag in the media, as well as Biden and various other pols and celebrities who tried and convicted him in the court of public opinion and that he wins every trial.

2. Rioters try to FAFO tonight and the national guard kills every last one of them.

Polishing your jackboots?

[3catcircus]

Originally Posted by Buddahaid

Polishing your jackboots?

Nope - the antifa scum are wearing all of them, with the Austrian government not far behind.

[3catcircus]

Originally Posted by mapuc

Thank you for the answer. It clearly show me that my knowledge about American law is insufficient.

Here a prosecutor can appeal a verdict. Which happens often.

Markus

That can generally only be covered by a mistrial without prejudice - there was legal procedure that wasn't adhered to, she to an unintentional error that offers no legal remedy in the trial, so they have a "do over." The defense can appeal a guilty verdict. The persecution normally can't appeal a note guilty verdict due to not being allowed to try someone for the same crime twice.

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by 3catcircus

That can generally only be covered by a mistrial without prejudice - there was legal procedure that wasn't adhered to, she to an unintentional error that offers no legal remedy in the trial, so they have a "do over." The defense can appeal a guilty verdict. The persecution normally can't appeal a note guilty verdict due to not being allowed to try someone for the same crime twice.

Your answer made me remember a movie with Tommy Lee Jones Can't come up with the title something with Jeopardy from the 90's I think it was.

Story:
A woman have just been released from a many years sentence for having killed her husband. It later turns out he's still alive-Well this time she kills him, but since she already been in jail for this murder, she goes free.

Edit
Just been reading a Danish article about the verdict.
I don't know how to translate an article so I just post the Danish version and i hope you know how to translate it into English

https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/vice...ygtede/8999327

End edit

Markus

[August]

The machine is still going after him:

[3catcircus]

Originally Posted by August

The machine is still going after him:

Chinese propaganda bots hard at work, I see.