New York Gay Marriage: First Gay Couples Marry At Midnight

[AVGWarhawk]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

Thanks man

ZeeWolf

Just looking at both sides of the story. There are always two sides to a story.

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Penguin

Listen ZeeTroll (see, I can be as witty as you with the usernames).
This is the last time I will bother with a reply to you. I offered a discussion in the holocaust thread.
As you do not only fight Marxism, but also the English language and grammar, I asked you to make your point clear. You behaved like a spoiled brat and refused to give an adult answer.

Also thank you very much for proving many of the points, about which I wrote in post #71, with your answer. As you might not have noticed, I called nobody else in this thread with whom I disagree, a conspiracy guy, only you. Use your braincells and try to figure out why this is so.

And please refrain from uttering poorly concealed threats against me. If you want to step up to your words and do it old-school: bring it on! I offer you, that we both do it old-school European style: 1 vs 1, no weapons, no cops...
PM me if you want do do this or put your threats where the sun never shines!

Have a nice rahowa!

I am sorry Pigwind I didn't mean any personal threat to you, I meant that
Americans will resort to an old school way of thinking, a mentality if you
will.
I want to harm to anyone and that includes you.
And writing as fast a you guys do is a struggle for me and yes I need more practice.

Sincerely,

ZeeWolf

Just a heads-up on how the Family Research Council is likely to present anything to do with homosexuality.

Didn't the FRC gert ripped about their publications by some of the scientists whose studies they quoted, something to do with cherry picking quotes to present an opposite conclusion as that presented in the studies they claimed backed them up.

[Betonov]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Didn't the FRC gert ripped about their publications by some of the scientists whose studies they quoted, something to do with cherry picking quotes to present an opposite conclusion as that presented in the studies they claimed backed them up.

It's called quote mining. Quite popular with these ''fammily'' organizations

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk

I don't find this to be the case. What I see is members that do not agree with the statement that homosexuals are child molesters. That is simply ridiculas.



The same chance as everyone else in proving your point/theory or otherwise.



Nah..he would ask his chimp Bubbles what to do.

No his chimps name was CHEETA!

It's called quote mining. Quite popular with these ''fammily'' organizations

But just for a laugh look at his latest source...

The following experts are from here:

...a fruitcake cretinist publication which quotes ......the Daily Mail

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve

So no one should say what they think unless it's guaranteed that there will be an opposing opinion for each person?


I highly doubt that Tarzan would care one way or the other about this discussion.


Interesting. I'll come back to this.

I figure if that crowd (the wicked and adulterous generation) could hate and spit on Jesus.
For predicting the Temple in Jerusalem will be destroyed so utterly that not one stone would be
left upon another. And that is exactly what happened in 70A.D.

You're jumbling Biblical quotes and trying to force them into a mold they weren't made to fit. According to the Bible Jesus said "A wicked and adulterous generation seeks a sign", which was a retort to the Pharisees when they demanded he prove himself by performing a supernatural feat. And the Pharisees, though Jews, could more aptly be compared to other religious/political leader wannabes, especially modern leaders of the Religious Right. Jesus never advocated hating any group despite knowing what was to happen.

Second, they didn't hate him and spit on him for predicting the destruction of the Temple. They did so because they were incited by the religious leaders, and they followed what they were told. And they weren't representative of all Jews, just the ones who were there that day. In that respect they were no different than the Germans who followed the Nazis. Not the Nazis themselves, but the otherwise good people who let perverted leaders goad them into acts of hatred.

Now, back to "reconsidering your plight". What exactly do you mean by this? That you're reconsidering whether you're right in your stated beliefs? Or whether you should even be here?


Do you really believe you're stupid, or is that just another arguing point?

As for helping you with "research", if you make a claim it's your job to back it up. In another discussion on another part of this forum, I uncovered evidence in support of the person opposing me. I brought this evidence forward, because I don't lie and I don't cheat. Likewise, if I stumbled on real evidence that supported your claims I would say so, and at least open it up for discussion, if not support it outright. That said, I'm not going to go looking for "facts" that support hatred, not that I believe there are any. So yes, in your quest to destroy anything and anyone you consider inferior or "wrong", you are indeed on your own.

Awe come on SS, I do not write as fast as you guys and therefore I become easily overwhelmed. Causing some frustration.
But I think I can get the hang of this stuff in due time and I will be less
of a drag on the conversations flow. I hope

ZeeWolf

[Takeda Shingen]

Maybe you should pull it back a little, ZeeWolf.

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

But just for a laugh look at his latest source...

...a fruitcake cretinist publication which quotes ......the Daily Mail

I changed my mind about Judy Ok

But here is the link:
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/p...osexual-world/

A huge number of Christians know full well that the effort to label anything
Anti-"Gay" as "Hate Speech" and eventually silencing those Christians (like
myself) and denouncing them as "Christian Fundamentalist" or "Extremest"
has an end goal of legitimizing the sick depraved behavior of the homosexual
and suppressing anything anti-Progressive agenda.

But hey keep laughing

ZeeWolf

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen

Maybe you should pull it back a little, ZeeWolf.

Ok Takeda Shingen, would you be so kind as to coach me on how I could do that?

Sincerely

ZeeWolf

[Takeda Shingen]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

Ok Takeda Shingen, would you be so kind as to coach me on how I could do that?

Sincerely

ZeeWolf

Certainly. You should have received the guidelines for behavior as a moderator when you were granted the position by Neal Stevens. You may wish to read those at this time, as you are currently in violation of a number of them. You may also wish to change the course of your behavior before Mr. Stevens comes by.

You may feel strongly, but as moderators, we have the responsibility not to behave in this manner. Our freedom of speech is the most restrictive of any members on this forum. We are to serve so that others may enjoy.

[Onkel Neal]

Takeda is right. Even moderators (myself included) get caught up in a debate. There are times when one should take the foot off the gas and coast a bit.

[MH]

Originally Posted by ZeeWolf

I changed my mind about Judy Ok

But here is the link:
http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/p...osexual-world/

A huge number of Christians know full well that the effort to label anything
Anti-"Gay" as "Hate Speech" and eventually silencing those Christians (like
myself) and denouncing them as "Christian Fundamentalist" or "Extremest"
has an end goal of legitimizing the sick depraved behavior of the homosexual
and suppressing anything anti-Progressive agenda.

But hey keep laughing

ZeeWolf

As far as statistics what about those demons lol-whats the point in this ideological quote exchange...

The evidence is that a higher percentage of Catholic priests and male Religious molest
children more than other ministers of religion. Clergy of all denominations do not molest
equally. In her foreword, the lawyer, Sylvia Demerest cites a 1995 survey of 19,000
treating professionals, funded by the National Centre on Child Abuse and Neglect. The
study found that in the US, 94% of abuses by religious authorities were sexual in nature.
Over half of these cases (54%) involved perpetrators and victims who were Catholic, even
though Roman Catholics comprise only 25% of the United States population. The minor
victims of priest abuse are overwhelmingly boys and teenagers, (80­90%), which is
contrary to the pattern of abuse in the general population.

Is not pedophilia a harshly treated crime in USA?

[ZeeWolf]

Originally Posted by Neal Stevens

Takeda is right. Even moderators (myself included) get caught up in a debate. There are times when one should take the foot off the gas and coast a bit.

Ok, Neal I will.

Thanks neal and Takeda,

ZeeWolf

But here is the link:

That is the link I already refered to, is it yet another case of you not reading what you are linking to

But hey keep laughing

I will, just keep posting from cretinist publications which quote the Daily Mail.
Its always good to see their views on science ,though their views on "christianity" can be just as funny