SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-11, 09:02 PM   #76
Gerald
SUBSIM Newsman
 
Gerald's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Close to sea
Posts: 24,254
Downloads: 553
Uploads: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
Sulu wasn't talking about detection range. Sulu was reporting effective weapons range.

Don't you know anything?
Are u sure,this is serious
__________________
Nothing in life is to be feard,it is only to be understood.

Marie Curie





Gerald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-11, 10:57 PM   #77
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
Sulu wasn't talking about detection range. Sulu was reporting effective weapons range.

Don't you know anything?
Still short range. 1 Light Second would be a more likely an effective weapons range (approx 300,000 km) since the Phasers on the Enterprise can fire in a barrage pattern and (somehow) detonate in proximity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Growler View Post
ooo... source? I want to read this shi-!! (Seriously - this is cool to me.)
http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/index.php
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 12:08 AM   #78
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
Still short range. 1 Light Second would be a more likely an effective weapons range (approx 300,000 km) since the Phasers on the Enterprise can fire in a barrage pattern and (somehow) detonate in proximity.
I knew you were making this up as you went along!

1. The targetting computers weren't that accurate back in the old days.

2. Phasers don't detonate - that takes a photon torpedo.

3. I saw it in the show, so there!

4. My BS mojo juju magic tech is both prettier and shinier than yours, so there again!
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 12:34 AM   #79
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
I knew you were making this up as you went along!
well how do you think I appear to know so much about everything!

Quote:
1. The targetting computers weren't that accurate back in the old days.

They seem to be able to hit a specific building on a planet from orbit... seems accurate to me...

Quote:
2. Phasers don't detonate - that takes a photon torpedo.
Quote:
KIRK: Battle status?
SULU: All stations manned, Captain.
STILES: Phaser weapons energised. Set for proximity blast.
-Balance of Terror (TOS)


__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 12:50 AM   #80
Onkel Neal
Born to Run Silent
 
Onkel Neal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Cougar Trap, Texas
Posts: 21,385
Downloads: 541
Uploads: 224


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tater View Post
Trek is crap as "real" science fiction, too.

Say what?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
Sulu wasn't talking about detection range. Sulu was reporting effective weapons range.
Don't you know anything?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor
Are u sure,this is serious
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web
Onkel Neal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 03:24 AM   #81
Wolfehunter
Crusty Capt.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,752
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
I knew you were making this up as you went along!

1. The targetting computers weren't that accurate back in the old days.

2. Phasers don't detonate - that takes a photon torpedo.

3. I saw it in the show, so there!

4. My BS mojo juju magic tech is both prettier and shinier than yours, so there again!
This^^ They used photon torpedoes for barrages. Phaser for precise targets.

One of my favorits Scifi chicks. is Natasha henstridge..
__________________
Wolfehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 09:17 AM   #82
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Stevens View Post
Say what?
ST is very "soft" SF.

The base rule for "hard" SF is to break as few laws of physics as possible, and follow the chain of "what-if" for those you do (based on how you explain them in the first place). FTL is gonna be a given for most SF, but the goal should be to break as little as possible. ST (particularly TNG) breaks new laws almost every episode. They use made-up technobabble as a plot device constantly (a sign of terrible writers), then more new "______-genic fields" constantly to fix the problem they set up weakly in the first place. ST got so bad that no given writer even had a clue that their plot was already solved by another weak writer's physics breaking invention.

ST is no more "hard" than Star Wars, IMHO, and no more consistent.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 09:20 AM   #83
tater
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
The RCS thrusters on the Space Shuttle (the ones they use for station keeping and docking) can be spotted by another ship with present day passive detection systems at ranges in excess of 100 million kilometers.
This is true. The notion of a spacecraft hiding is nonsense. Even just the temperature of the crew compartment (by definition some sort of comfy "room temperature" for humans) makes it visible in IR very far away using IR telescopes. Throw in any sort of drive capable of pushing it at high speed and ships don't hide.
tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 10:30 AM   #84
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfehunter View Post
This^^ They used photon torpedoes for barrages. Phaser for precise targets.
Except in Balance of Terror the writers hadn't "invented" photon torpedoes yet. So phasers have a depth charge like proximity fuse as a result.

Considering they are a particle weapon you can do funny things with them.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-11, 11:00 AM   #85
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike View Post
They seem to be able to hit a specific building on a planet from orbit... seems accurate to me...

-Balance of Terror (TOS)


I think "from orbit" can be classified as "point blank".


Some mouth-breathing dweeb once tried to rope me into an argument about which movie Batman would win a fight. My answer? "Whichever one the screenwriters said would win!"
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.