Visual evidence for global warming

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by Narcosis

You said:

Actually, he never said that. What he did say was:

"The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous."

And what is wrong or inaccurate with that quote? It is taken from "Aus Churchills Lügenfabrik" ("Churchill's Lie Factory"), 12 January 1941, Die Zeit ohne Beispiel (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP., 1941), pp. 364-369.

Source: Joseph Goebbels @ Wikiquote.

Is this fun or what?!

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady

And what is wrong or inaccurate with that quote? It is taken from "Aus Churchills Lügenfabrik" ("Churchill's Lie Factory"), 12 January 1941, Die Zeit ohne Beispiel (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP., 1941), pp. 364-369.

Source: Joseph Goebbels @ Wikiquote.

Is this fun or what?!

Yes i am enjoying it Avon, may be we can have babies later.

He passes comments in a book, these are not quotes that he gave to the masses.

This is what i was trying to do when using Goebbels speech, which was just summarised in a sentence. (Hitler does mention it too)
Though having lessons in the accuracy of the words from one of Hitlers buddies, by some one living in Israel, is some what amusing...

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by Narcosis

Yes i am enjoying it Avon, may be we can have babies later.

OK. I had one last.

It's your turn.

He passes comments in a book, these are not quotes that he gave to the masses.

This is what i was trying to do when using Goebbels speech, which was just summarised in a sentence. (Hitler does mention it too)

Source? Still waiting.

Though having lessons in the accuracy of the words from one of Hitlers buddies, by some one living in Israel, is some what amusing...

I see nothing amusing at all about historic accuracy.

I very often check the accuracy of quotes that get posted, here and elsewhere. In fact, lookee here.

[aaken]

Narcosis, I don't know if you have noticed but the references that you provided
in your previous post do not support your thesis that, according to NASA, the
global warming is not caused by human emissions.

http://www.newscientistspace.com/art...d-by-nasa.html

In this article the focus is put on the proliferation of glowing clouds. Citing
form the article:
"Many researchers believe this proliferation is down to human activities. "You need three things for clouds to form: particles that water can condense onto; water; and cold temperatures," says Russell. He says pollution and global warming are thought to be responsible for two of those factors."
In any case, the article is not directly linked to the discussion if the global
warming is caused by human activity.

http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/earth/gw/co2.html
In this article it is pointed out a theory that links the global warming not to
the CO2 emissions, as previously thought, but to non-CO2 emissions like methane,
CFC and soot particles. Also in this article it seems that there is no mention
to the fact that global warming is not related to human activities.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ut_030320.html
In this article it is argued that "one component of global warming" may be the
increase in solar radiation.
Citing from the article:
"That does not mean industrial pollution has not been a significant factor, Willson cautioned."

Your last reference is a search on the NASA website. I cannot cite all articles
because they are many but I haven't found one single article that affirms that
global warming is either inexistent or not connected to human activity.

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady

OK. I had one last.

It's your turn.

Source? Still waiting.

I see nothing amusing at all about historic accuracy.

I very often check the accuracy of quotes that get posted, here and elsewhere. In fact, lookee here.

Avon, the debate is on Global Climate. Total Accuracy in quotes that have nothing to do with the subject in matter, is not relevant.

I made a comment that was just not fully accurate on the wording, but the same point i tried to make is still the same even if i had used the whole Quote.

While you say you are checking quotes on the forums (as a hobby i expect), might i add that you have not yet questioned any of my references on Global Climate references for their accuracy.

Might it be that you are "Nit picking" on my quote as distraction, because you can not find any of my references in-accurate.. :hmm:

[The Avon Lady]

Originally Posted by Narcosis

Might it be that you are Nit picking on my quote as distraction, because you can not find any of my references in-accurate..:hmm:

I might be but I'm not.

As for whose side I'm on, did you noticed my link to and quote of the Opinion Journal article one page back plus my clarification that followed a few posts afterward? Or do you disgaree with that article?

Originally Posted by aaken

Narcosis, I don't know if you have noticed but the references that you provided
in your previous post do not support your thesis that, according to NASA, the
global warming is not caused by human emissions.

http://www.newscientistspace.com/art...d-by-nasa.html

In this article the focus is put on the proliferation of glowing clouds. Citing
form the article:
"Many researchers believe this proliferation is down to human activities. "You need three things for clouds to form: particles that water can condense onto; water; and cold temperatures," says Russell. He says pollution and global warming are thought to be responsible for two of those factors."
In any case, the article is not directly linked to the discussion if the global
warming is caused by human activity.

http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/earth/gw/co2.html
In this article it is pointed out a theory that links the global warming not to
the CO2 emissions, as previously thought, but to non-CO2 emissions like methane,
CFC and soot particles. Also in this article it seems that there is no mention
to the fact that global warming is not related to human activities.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ut_030320.html
In this article it is argued that "one component of global warming" may be the
increase in solar radiation.
Citing from the article:
"That does not mean industrial pollution has not been a significant factor, Willson cautioned."

Your last reference is a search on the NASA website. I cannot cite all articles
because they are many but I haven't found one single article that affirms that
global warming is either inexistent or not connected to human activity.

You need to look harder

Quote:

"The largest fluctuations in the satellite temperature data are not from any man-made activity, but from natural phenomena "


http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/head...d06oct97_1.htm

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/New...081215330.html

Originally Posted by The Avon Lady

I might be but I'm not.

As for whose side I'm on, did you noticed my link to and quote of the Opinion Journal article one page back plus my clarification that followed a few posts afterward? Or do you disgaree with that article?

Dam, Avon sorry i missed that one...

Hang on, are they not the same people who are members of this outfit

http://www.clowns-international.co.u...smos.pl?page=1

[MobyGrape]

Never ever believe a reporter..HaHaah.
probably glued to Faux news..:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

[ASWnut101]

nice name

heres a try: CNN-Communist news network (no offence nube)