GTX260 is worse then 8800GT - Page 4

weeksatsea · 04-28-10, 03:37 PM

How about CPU ? This game is not so CPU intensive, but it's still a big big factor in performance usually.

I play Rise of flight mostly now , and the Windows 7 - dual core combination is terrible for performance.

BTW, the $300 wasn't a waste because you now have a good card for other games ! Good move.

dougandtoni · 04-30-10, 03:02 AM

I will say it once again. Run furmark on the card and post results

http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/

Icarus1 · 04-30-10, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dougandtoni

I will say it once again. Run furmark on the card and post results

http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/

What do you use if you have 64bit?

stoppro · 05-04-10, 11:43 AM

I had gtx 260 and went to 295.The 260 stuttered when using the deck gun. now with 295 it freezes. what the hell?my system is 1000 bfg psu-amd quad-xp64bit os. I did the driver cleaner install latest drives-older drivers nothing change except sometimes it crashes after freezing. back to 260-anyone want a 295 ? i cant get the sob to work.

Spartan_X · 05-05-10, 02:48 AM

My CPU is a E6850 overclocked to 3.41Ghz and my GFX card is a GTX285 ... And all i can i say is that the frame rate is sluggish. Ive seen it dropping to 30fps at times. I can't understand it. I can play Crysis with everything maxed out, on 1920x1200 with 2x antialising, and still have a smooth framerate, and this game here runs slow. It is even more obvious inside the submarine pen. That's bad programming i guess.

dougandtoni · 05-05-10, 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icarus1

What do you use if you have 64bit?

Well Doh i am using Windows 7 64 Bit. Furmark runs as good as gold. 32 bit programes still run on a 64 bit system. I am running a e6400 core duo overclocked from 2.13GHZ to 3.00GHZ and two GTX 260s in sli.In furmark at 1680x1050 full screen i get a maximum of 180 fps. With SLI off a single 260 gets a max of 92. So if he is getting a lot less than that its a good indication that his card is stuffed

dougandtoni · 05-05-10, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dougandtoni

I will say it once again. Run furmark on the card and post results

http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/

Dooooo it

dougandtoni · 05-05-10, 04:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dougandtoni

Dooooo it

Just run the furmark test.

04-28-10, 03:37 PM	#46
weeksatsea Watch Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 22 Downloads: 31 Uploads: 0	How about CPU ? This game is not so CPU intensive, but it's still a big big factor in performance usually. I play Rise of flight mostly now , and the Windows 7 - dual core combination is terrible for performance. BTW, the $300 wasn't a waste because you now have a good card for other games ! Good move. __________________

05-04-10, 11:43 AM	#49
stoppro Sonar Guy Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: vero beach fl Posts: 380 Downloads: 495 Uploads: 0	same problem with 295 gtx I had gtx 260 and went to 295.The 260 stuttered when using the deck gun. now with 295 it freezes. what the hell?my system is 1000 bfg psu-amd quad-xp64bit os. I did the driver cleaner install latest drives-older drivers nothing change except sometimes it crashes after freezing. back to 260-anyone want a 295 ? i cant get the sob to work.

04-30-10, 03:02 AM	#47
dougandtoni Mate Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: New Zealand Posts: 58 Downloads: 60 Uploads: 0	I will say it once again. Run furmark on the card and post results http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/

05-05-10, 02:48 AM	#50
Spartan_X Nub Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 3 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	My CPU is a E6850 overclocked to 3.41Ghz and my GFX card is a GTX285 ... And all i can i say is that the frame rate is sluggish. Ive seen it dropping to 30fps at times. I can't understand it. I can play Crysis with everything maxed out, on 1920x1200 with 2x antialising, and still have a smooth framerate, and this game here runs slow. It is even more obvious inside the submarine pen. That's bad programming i guess.