SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-09, 10:09 PM   #1
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default An M1A2 can hit over 70 MPH if you remove the govener?

Wow! Just watched that on TV. Some things I didn't know about the M1, that is for sure.

The Leopard II though - best tank in the world as far as best bang for the buck goes. The M1A2 is the Rolls Royce however. One on one, Leopard II is dead, but at what price tag? Is it really worth that much more for a marginal performance improvement? I'd have to say yes since I believe our troops should have the best there is, bar none.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-09, 10:24 PM   #2
Sledgehammer427
PacWagon
 
Sledgehammer427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Drinking coffee and staring at trees in Massachusetts
Posts: 2,908
Downloads: 287
Uploads: 0
Default

I am all for the leopard 2, the Germans know their tanking, and my uncle who served in the gulf war told me a story about how his Humvee was doing about 55 mph and to his suprise an M1 went screaming by. granted, those gas-turbine engines are a hoot, but it seriously reduces the M1's range.
which is why I would prefer the leopards diesel engine.

now there's going to be a big long argument about which tank is better hehe
__________________
Cold Waters Voice Crew - Fire Control Officer
Cmdr O. Myers - C/O USS Nautilus (SS-168)
114,000 tons sunk - 4 Spec Ops completed
V-boat Nutcase - Need supplies? Japanese garrison on a small island in the way? Just give us a call! D4C!
Sledgehammer427 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-09, 10:42 PM   #3
Task Force
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SPACE!!!!
Posts: 10,142
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
Default

I perfer the tiger panzer... but... thats alittle outdated...:rotfl:
__________________
Task Force industries "Taking control of the world, one mind at a time"
Task Force is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-09, 11:14 PM   #4
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Australia bought the M1's instead of the leopard 2. I still think we should have gone for the leopard 2
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-09, 11:42 PM   #5
August
Wayfaring Stranger
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,199
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0


Default

I once drove an M113 APC over 50mph on cobblestones. It was a puckering experience.
__________________


Flanked by life and the funeral pyre. Putting on a show for you to see.
August is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-09, 10:08 AM   #6
Melonfish
XO
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 417
Downloads: 106
Uploads: 0
Default

you guys are just missing the challenger II! what a tank! i mean can you name any other tank with a built in water heater?
pete
Melonfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-09, 10:25 AM   #7
SteamWake
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,224
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
I once drove an M113 APC over 50mph on cobblestones. It was a puckering experience.
Thats what I was thinking a ride in that thing at 70mph would be like being stuck in a clothes dryer.
__________________
Follow the progress of Mr. Mulligan : http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=147648
SteamWake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-09, 12:51 PM   #8
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,369
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
I once drove an M113 APC over 50mph on cobblestones. It was a puckering experience.
Can I ask how you measured the speed? That seems a bit fast.

http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m113.html#M113A1

Top road speed is listed at 40 and I never was able to get a 113 above that.

The speedometers on our 113's were off a lot due to the vibrations and abuse and I don't think we ever used them in convoy. We just had pacer vehicles and intervals.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-09, 06:18 PM   #9
Falkirion
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne, AUS
Posts: 1,043
Downloads: 34
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bookworm_020 View Post
Australia bought the M1's instead of the leopard 2. I still think we should have gone for the leopard 2
Couldn't agree with you more Book.
Falkirion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-09, 09:48 PM   #10
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

You guys are forgetting - the M1 has 505 Gallons of fuel on board. Yes, takes a lot to fill up, but what other tank can you run up into the local civi's garage, find some paint thinner, some vodka, and it can run on it? That is what it is designed to do - run on anything decently flammable.

Stick that in your Leopard! Gonna cause you much headache!

Aussies made a wise, but expensive purchase. Of course, the extra 18 tons of weight will do wonders for your black top! I guess if you are on a budget, a Leopard will fit the bill.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.