SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
07-20-10, 02:56 PM | #46 | |
Eternal Patrol
|
Quote:
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
07-20-10, 02:58 PM | #47 |
The Old Man
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,441
Downloads: 234
Uploads: 0
|
I switched to SH4 1.5 plus OM and OMEGU for my ATO fix. OM has it all and graphically SH4 scales very well to the Wide Screen LCD I use.
Lurker provides exceptional support and innovation. That other sim is but a foggy memory now.
__________________
Wilcke For the best in Fleet Boats go to: Submarine Sim Central. http://forum.kickinbak.com/index.php Check out: A Brief Introduction to the Pacific Submarine War by Ducimus http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=128185 Operation Monsun plus OMEGU, the #1 ATO Solution for SH4! Signature Art by Gunfighter |
07-20-10, 03:10 PM | #48 |
Eternal Patrol
|
I wish I could say the same, but there are still things over there that SH4 doesn't have...yet. But people are working on it, so someday...
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
07-20-10, 03:24 PM | #49 |
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 604
Downloads: 139
Uploads: 0
|
As I can see you don't know what you are talking about! OM is first and foremost a German CAMPAIGN for SH4 with OMEGU being not mandatory, say "auxiliary stuff" and that should be a crucial point of every comparison between OM and GWX3, as I understand. So familiar yourself with OM a bit more (read lurker's info in OM thread) instead of telling me I am impolite. Then you will understand several flaws found in OM but not present in GWX3 which may ruin your feeling are heritage of stock SH4 not being fixable at the moment (CO2 increasings during snorkeling, unrealistic Type XXI performance etc.).
Last edited by Gorshkov; 07-20-10 at 03:37 PM. |
07-20-10, 03:34 PM | #50 |
Admiral
|
I of course know that OM is about the german side. Not interested in pacific theatre. But I only tested the single missions instead of the campaign. That's enough for checking if I like the sim or not. It's not the campaign I am talking about. It's the athmosphere - the sim-feeling. And this, my friend, is purely subjective. If I say, I don't like SH4, this means: I don't like SH4 (subjective!). This does not mean, that SH4 is a bad game (objective). Do you know the difference between subjective and objective view? And now please excuse me, this discussion makes me tired and has ended for me. Best wishes.
|
07-20-10, 03:40 PM | #51 |
Commodore
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 604
Downloads: 139
Uploads: 0
|
Great! Subjective feelings after playing single missions only in the OM campaign...Did you play single missions only in GWX3, too?
|
07-20-10, 05:08 PM | #52 |
Commodore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 641
Downloads: 167
Uploads: 0
|
I think this thread has reached the point where personal invective has replaced substantive comparisons of OM and GWX. In the future, please remember that not everyone's English is as good as yours and try to give them the benefit of the doubt before taking insult at something someone has said. Pablo
__________________
"...far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." - Theodore Roosevelt, speech before the Hamilton Club, Chicago, April 10, 1899 |
|
|