![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#496 | |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]() Quote:
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#497 | |
Let's Sink Sumptin' !
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ear-power.html ![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() --Mobilis in Mobili-- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#498 | |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]() Quote:
headless chickens and intoxicated sea water. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#499 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
The 3 guys who stood in the incredibly radioactive water for 2 hours?
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/28_33.html All just fine. LOL: Reality check on nuclear hysteria: Japan is looking at over 20,000 people dead from the Tsunami. The dead/missing number I keep seeing is 28,000. Their infrastructure is hosed, so even those with homes might not be able to heat them. Meanwhile, really bad nuclear disasters have killed... no one. They have acutely injured? I think a few guys were injured in the initial explosions. Acute rad injury? None. Will any have a meaningful dose by the end? Likely. Fatal in any short timespans like decades? Unlikely. Even if all the guys working there died it would be noise compared to the rest of the quake/tsunami deaths. Is it OK to be concerned? Of course. Hysterical? Nope. Remember that all the deaths that come for power production using a more dangerous source are on the hands of the "greens" and other kooks who will respond irrationally to this. Fission isn't perfect, but it's a damn reasonable choice until we have something better.
__________________
"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." — Thomas Paine Last edited by tater; 03-29-11 at 07:42 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#500 |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Cracks found in the reactor:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110402/...us_japan_quake And survivors angry at Nuclear focus of disaster relief: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#501 |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Dog rescued at sea 3 weeks after....
Ahhhhhhhhh...... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#502 | |
Dipped Squirrel Operative
|
![]() Quote:
This is .. interesting. Nuclear victims Tchernobyl alone are - as it has just been published - (again!), 220,000 injured directly related to the Tchernobyl "accident". There were 356,000, but the rest has meanwhile died. By all means this is a bit more than 9,000, which would be bad enough. Or is this table from 1986 ? Greetings, Catfish |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#503 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 9,023
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 2
|
![]()
That is all deaths since 1986. No real source puts the deaths at anything like the number you quote. Not by orders of magnitude.
BTW, even if you used your numbers, nuclear would still be grossly safer than coal.
__________________
"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." — Thomas Paine |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#504 |
Lucky Sailor
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rome
Posts: 4,273
Downloads: 81
Uploads: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#505 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
And a happy ending to the rescued dog's story - her owner is safe, recognized the dog on the news and was reunited with the pet
![]() http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12957838 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#506 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Nice one
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|