SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-06, 01:13 PM   #31
Kurushio
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Well a merc is a merc...whatever you call it..."nationalist" or otherwise. The end of the day, if the US cannot provide security in Iraq through their military and have to use mercs...than that to me is wrong. But then again...the wars all about making money for Rumsfeld.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-06, 01:26 PM   #32
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tycho102
That Geneva convention sh*t is based off a RECOGNIZABLE UNIFORM. The requirement was intended to make guerrila warfare much less attractive.

Amazingly enough (to me, anyway), throwing on a pair of black pajamas with some kind of rank insignia and carrying an AK-47 is enough to validate this requirement. And when the Russians went through Berlin, they shot non-uniformed bastards on sight; they were fortunate enough to have that luxury, however, since they had very little use for intelligence (pun intended). It's too bad we need intelligence as much as we need dead jihadists. C'est la vie.

It also occurs to me that people are confusing "freelance mercs" with "nationalist mercs". American mercenaries are nationalists -- they intend to return to America and live in America. They sign contracts which, along with an NDA and a form of the UCMJ, includes a non-competitive clause. Meaning that unless they become freelance mercs (and consequentially be hunted across the "western world"), they have to abide by that contract.

Freelance mercenaries are the ones that go for the most cash. Blackwater does not employ freelancers. The CIA and NSA probably do on a routine basis.


Oil. It all comes right back to oil. And general anti-Americanism, which is based off the need for oil and fear of a fatwa on you.
All you need is an insignia - the point is, some way to recognize the bad guy to keep from killing civillians - and to prevent spies - the two very things this writting is written so strong for. Fail to have a simple insignia, regardless if you are wearing some stealth uniform, even if its black pajamas ninja style, violates this simple law of warfare. The terrorists claimed war on America and the rest of the world, so if its war they want, then they must abide by this, or suffer its consequences. Just my 2 cents.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-06, 04:19 PM   #33
bradclark1
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA.
Posts: 2,794
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
They stay in static positions? Is that why they have pickups?
If you are referring to the above photo's
They're doing a job guarding convoys. Troops can't do it nor can they use military equipment. They probably work for the same company that operates the convoy. Calling them mercs is a long stretch. They are armed guards nothing more, nothing less.

Quote:
These guys are trigger-happy mercs. Do I need to show you the video where they shoot up innocent civilians just because they don't see a sign which says "STAY BACK 100 METRES"...which can't be read over distance of more then 20 metres even with perfect vision and is written in English which most Iraqis cannot read?
What does the video have to do about being mercenary or not?

Quote:
Oh yeah....and those kick arse Seals and SF had thair arse handed to them on more then one occassion. Don't make me post the "Camel" video....you forget that what makes the SF so special is also the support they get...you know, minibird, AC130 Spectre etc. These guys only have a Toyota HiLux as back up.
Don't know anything about a "Camel" video. Who hasn't had their asses handed to them in war before? Look at that SAS team from Gulf 1 that got captured. A shepard boy done them in. S#!t happens. It's how they are used that makes the difference. Their skills are keener than the average soldier and they are more motivated. It doesn't make them bulletproof.
If you were some muckidy muck who would you rather have guarding you? Average Joe Smuck or a highly motivated and skilled special operations type?
bradclark1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-06, 05:42 PM   #34
Kurushio
Stowaway
 
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
Default

Well your last question is obvious. Though they aren't all ex-SF. A lot of these guys are South Africans and Australians...with dubious past military experience, I'd bet.

The "camel" video I was talking about is this one:



Don't bother watching if you don't like this sort of thing...no gore...but one guy dies...his name was "camel".

By the way..ignore the comments...whoever wrote that doesn;t have a clue. The camera is mounted on the car dashboard...there is no "camera-man". One fatality...Camel was shot in the head (he's the one with the Australian accent who says "ahh...f*ck, I'm hit bad!). There was no road block. The commander ordered them to wait there. They were ambushed on the "Highway of Death"....the one that goes to the airport, I believe. For some reason they were just sitting there...like dead ducks. Nobody knows why.

Last edited by Kurushio; 07-18-06 at 05:50 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.