SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: Should the USCG's new cutters be more heavily armed?
Yes, why not? 13 50.00%
No, the Coast Guard has no need for such a heavily armed cutter. 13 50.00%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-06, 10:32 AM   #31
Rockstar
In the Brig
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Zendia Bar & Grill
Posts: 12,614
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Real icebreakers are painted red.
Rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-06, 01:29 PM   #32
Bort
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Studying in Atlanta
Posts: 919
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
The RCG is a national defense force.

The USCG is a security and economic defense force, an immigration control service and a marine safety service.
One of the primary missions of the Coast Guard is national defense, hense the USCG's participation in every major war the US has ever fought (1812, Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Cold War, Gulf War, Iraq War, War on Terror and some others). Not to mention exercising soverignty over US waters.


Quote:
The Cold War is O-V-E-R. And the war on terrorism is going to be entirely different.
Yes, it is,, but the titanic clash of the US and China will soon begin . And they have subs-and ships, lots of em and soon to be more. I have a feeling that soon we'll need all the ASW we can get.



Quote:
Real icebreakers are painted red.
the Big Mac is red now, she was repainted sometime after the 1999 or 2000 ice seasons. I'm not sure why they took so long. She looked better in white anyway IMHO.
__________________

GT Aerospace
Bort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-06, 07:12 PM   #33
Bort
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Studying in Atlanta
Posts: 919
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

*BUMP*
__________________

GT Aerospace
Bort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-06, 10:46 AM   #34
Rockstar
In the Brig
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Zendia Bar & Grill
Posts: 12,614
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

When the Westwind left the lakes there were no more real breakers around so they painted that showboat wannbe breaker

(WAGB 281) Westwind 1980-83
Rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-06, 03:01 PM   #35
Bort
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Studying in Atlanta
Posts: 919
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
When the Westwind left the lakes there were no more real breakers around so they painted that showboat wannbe breaker
Umm... The Mackinaw is actually longer and wider than the Wind class ice breakers, and are only behind the Wind's in draft and displacement.
Wind Class
length 269 ft
beam 63 1/2 ft
6,500 tons displacement
Mackinaw
length 290ft
beam 74ft
5,000 tons displacement

I'm pretty sure that the Mackinaw is more than just a "wannabe" icebreaker, which cutter is still in service after 62 years?
__________________

GT Aerospace
Bort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-06, 03:16 PM   #36
Etienne
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 695
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *[FOX
* Bort]I'm pretty sure that the Mackinaw is more than just a "wannabe" icebreaker, which cutter is still in service after 62 years?
Gotta love fresh water.
Etienne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.