SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-06, 08:46 AM   #1
Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,140
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocal
Because, in real life, the SM-1 just wasn't a terribly effective weapon
It is still a whole lot better than nothing.

Quote:
and cost too much to maintain the support and training pipeline for the one-arm bandit.
With dozens of Perrys still alive?

Quote:
now, since they got Nulkas on-board.
What Nulka? Looks it up...

Oh, so instead of hard intercepts, they are going to put their prayers in soft defenses. The toy doesn't even have IR jamming. I understand that at least a few SSM and ASMs are incorporating IR/IIR homing as an option... there are also ASMs with passive radar homing capability - that toy might just attract everyone with its jamming - the first wave goes for the toy, but the second wave hits when the jamming goes down and the ship itself is unmasked...

Not to mention according to the site they'd basically be installing it on everyone but the Perrys...

Perrys are supposed to be cheap units, but the men cost as much as the ones anywhere else I would think.
Kazuaki Shimazaki II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 09:05 AM   #2
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,130
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

the perry frigate is still a good effective unit although age is creaping up on them, i was assigned to U.S.S Robert G Bradley FFG-49 in seawolves so i done some back ground on it.

the units them selves are highly capible ASW units and have limited self defence capibilitys, however they could be compaired to a british type 23 although more modern is the brit ship, they still both have very good uses and the perry should still be active for a while yet.

id hope to see a perry around in 2020 it can be done with tiawan or another 3rd world country so it be nice to see them last.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 10:00 AM   #3
Apocal
Navy Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 176
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapitain
why dont they insert a plug and put VLS missiles in thier only a few that way you could extend the life of the ship another 20 years and have a more modern feel to it.

or replace the lot entirely
The FFGs won't last another 20 years without a major overhaul and the USN isn't going to spend the kind of money for that on a platform who's mission went away with the Cold War.

Quote:
It is still a whole lot better than nothing.
Not really... even with the CORT upgrades it was only a middling effective against seaskimming missiles, even subsonic ones. And CORT was expensive enough that only eleven (IIRC) FFGs received it along with the SM-1 Blk VI.

Quote:
With dozens of Perrys still alive?
Yep. Majority of them weren't shooting missiles that could take down any threat imagined. It was in the uncomfortable middle ground of costing what a system should, but not providing the capability a system should. The Underwood types had capability, but keeping the Mk. 13 pipeline open just for them was cost-prohibitive.

Quote:
What Nulka? Looks it up...

Oh, so instead of hard intercepts, they are going to put their prayers in soft defenses. The toy doesn't even have IR jamming. I understand that at least a few SSM and ASMs are incorporating IR/IIR homing as an option... there are also ASMs with passive radar homing capability - that toy might just attract everyone with its jamming - the first wave goes for the toy, but the second wave hits when the jamming goes down and the ship itself is unmasked...
They still carry flares and they have more than one Nulka onboard. It's an expendable asset, like super rocs. Passive only missiles are easy to deal with by turning off your emitters.

Quote:
id hope to see a perry around in 2020 it can be done with tiawan or another 3rd world country so it be nice to see them last.
Given that there are still WW2-era Gearing-class destroyers around, I think you'll get your wish of seeing a OHP in 2020.
Apocal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 01:29 PM   #4
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuaki Shimazaki II
Oh, so instead of hard intercepts, they are going to put their prayers in soft defenses. The toy doesn't even have IR jamming. I understand that at least a few SSM and ASMs are incorporating IR/IIR homing as an option... there are also ASMs with passive radar homing capability - that toy might just attract everyone with its jamming - the first wave goes for the toy, but the second wave hits when the jamming goes down and the ship itself is unmasked...
Did you know the majority of ASM attacks that have been thwarted were by "Soft Kills"? In the Falklands RN ships both Jammed and Spoofed (chaffed) Exocets, and in Operation Praying Mantis a USN ship (might have been a Fig7) spoofed an Iranian Harpoon with chaff. I think there has been only one hard kill with a SAM in the history of naval warfare (a Type 42 against a Silkworm in the Gulf War). :hmm:
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 01:53 PM   #5
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

We sure have built a lot of weapons in the past 50 years that have never really been used at all or anywhere near their capacity during actual combat... :hmm:
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 09:10 PM   #6
RedDevilCG
Watch
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 26
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Actually, I think that the Victoria Class Diesel SSK would be an insane unit in DW.

Here is a good overview of the boat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Class

Some notes that I found surprising:
-"operation noise while running diesel were comparable to a SSN"!
- Has 6 torpedo tubes armed with the Mk 48 Torp!
- Towed array!
-Mast operation at 12kts

I would take this over any other sub in DW for ocean hunting.
RedDevilCG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 09:10 PM   #7
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuftWolf
We sure have built a lot of weapons in the past 50 years that have never really been used at all or anywhere near their capacity during actual combat... :hmm:
Thats not nessarly a bad thing...
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 09:17 PM   #8
Mocbo
Watch
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Luftwolf:You say a real Word.
None of the VLS Systems or BlockIII Standard Missiles have been used real Combat conditions for multiple Hardkills. The CIWS too.
The Same is it with the whole Russian Big Anti Ship Cruise Missiles.
Only in Games like Harpoon , Fleet Command or DW are used these Weapons . The Real Power signs on a Real Battlefield not in a Game. Only Thomahawks ( TLAM variant) have been used and somtimes the 76 mm Guns on the Ships.
Nor real modern Torpedo has hit a modern Real Sub etc....

The actual Iran Conflict can do to use the Weapons REAL....

Greetings

Moc
Mocbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 09:47 PM   #9
TLAM Strike
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, New York
Posts: 8,633
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 6


Default

The CIWS has been used in combat; it was the one on an Iowa class battleship. It didn't hit the missile (the bullets hit another US ship ) but the missile was shot down by a RN type 42 DDG.

Modern torpedoes have been used in combat. In the Falklands the ARA San Luis made several attacks on RN warships with no hits. Also the ARA Santa Fe got some homing torpedoes (Stingrays?) from a Wasp shot at it but they only succeeded in forcing the ship to beach when some AS-12 missiles blew a hole in her conning tower. And in the 60-70s a Pakistani sub fired several homing torpedoes on a Indian Frigate with one finally scoring a hit.
__________________


TLAM Strike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-06, 10:38 PM   #10
Apocal
Navy Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 176
Downloads: 18
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
The CIWS has been used in combat; it was the one on an Iowa class battleship. It didn't hit the missile (the bullets hit another US ship ) but the missile was shot down by a RN type 42 DDG.
It hit the super-roc (chaff) fired by the Iowa. Normally, this wouldn't wouldn't happen, but Iowa fired her super-roc in the general direction of a ship which (stupidly) hadn't set firing sectors so CIWS decided it was a threat and blasted it.
Apocal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.