![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#31 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The mathematics of how long to sprint and how long to drift in order to catch a given target leaves very little room for error. It's not like barrier searches where departing from the mathematically optimal search tends to make only a little difference unless the search was basically a bad idea anyhow. I wonder, then, why it's mentioned so frequently as a tactic in historical works (WWI and WWII). Was there a historical situation where the other concerns which make it meaningless today weren't such an issue? Or maybe those histories are incorrect? Maybe WWII convoys crept along at a snail's pace. Who knows? *shrug* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I'm SURE some SHIII naval historical hotshot type can tell me how I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that convoys crossing the Atlantic during WWII did so generally at full steam for the slowest boats, which would be 9-12kts, perhaps a bit more, and try to make a zig zag pattern.
The goal was to confuse visual range and solution finding, not sonar and TMA ranging.
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|