![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#31 |
Sonar Guy
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 380
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well during daylight i run half surfaced at 7.5m depth which makes it possible to dive normally in time to avoid the negativ sideeffects of crash diving. Everything works the same way then std surfaced except it slows me down about 20% and possibly my accustic signature is higher. If im lucky and the planes are not fast fighters im submerged before being spotted. I engage planes only if my position is too far away from any base for fighters to engage me. Those are the only ones i dont dare to fight.
btw. If i need to stay to make sure my victim(s) are really sinking i do this at periscope depth cause the captain of the ship will call for assistance by radio. If he is in range of an airbase 15-20 min later planes are showing up and looking for me if its during daylight and the wheather permits it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
GWX Project Director
|
![]()
Well, the first thing that I do when I see an enemy aircraft... is to scream curses at it!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northampton,UK
Posts: 1,859
Downloads: 86
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
'It is not surely known when the grey wolf shall come upon the seat of the gods' Ericksmal. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 818
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ah, no - it should make things deadly.
My recollection is that FIDO was so effective (unlike the initial German version that was rushed into service due to combat pressures before its 'glitches' were ironed out) that the Germans knew nothing of it until after the war - the only boats aware of it were destroyed by it...... NOT something I'd look forward to. I imagine your only real hope would be to shut down your engines and change course/depth....at least it didn't use active sonar. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bia³ystok, Polska
Posts: 272
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Fast dive and change of course
![]() ![]()
__________________
"U-106" No one will be forgotten... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Put my head betwwen my knees and kiss my A$$ goodbye!
![]() Dive like there's no tomorrow, and if I'm not fast enough, there won't be! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 818
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
A follow up to my previous:
"340 [Fido] torpedoes [were] dropped in 264 attacks of which 204 were against submarines. In 142 attacks US aircraft sank 31 submarines and damaged 15; in 62 attacks against submarines other Allies, mainly British, sank six and damaged three. Most of these submarine sinkings were German U-boats in the Atlantic, but five Japanese submarines were sunk by Fidos, one, I-52, in the Atlantic and four in the Pacific. OEG Study No. 289, 12 August 1946, is the main source for this conclusion."Fido was first used successfully by a British B-24 Liberator defending Convoy HX 237 on 12 May 1943, sinking U-456. This was followed by a USN PBY-5A from VP 84 which sank U-640 on 14 May 1943. I still think it's true the Germans were unaware of it - due to its small warhead (about 45kg torpex) they probably thought the damage was from a near bomb/depth charge.....either way, these stats make it clear it's NOT a pleasant experience for the recipient: - 27% of attacks lead to damage or destruction of target submarine (18% destruction, 9% damage). So there's a 1/4 chance it will hit you, and a 66% chance that any hit will be fatal. YIKES!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sheffield, England
Posts: 2,679
Downloads: 165
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Regarding Metox,i'm not sure,but were'nt the emissions really miniscule,and hard for RAF bomber command/planes/ships to detect?.I havent had this device yet,but know a little about it,as it gave the uboat a few vital seconds to prepare for an incoming aerial attack! ![]() It sounds like a very vital piece of equipment to me,better than having nothing!.
__________________
Best Patrol: 10 merchants + HMS Nelson for 68.056 Tonnes |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 913
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If you're using an early radar system turn it on for very short periods of time & don't forget to turn it off. Leaving it active is a sure fire way to draw some unwanted attention to yourself. One time I was found by a Catalina in the middle of a pitch black night, 100's of miles from the nearest land. I'd forgotten to shut the
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bastogne, Belgium
Posts: 716
Downloads: 86
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
:p |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Officer
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 241
Downloads: 67
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Question:- What do you do if you see enemy aircraft?
Answer:- Easy flush the toilet ![]() ![]() ![]() Anybody got any spare toilet paper ![]() ![]() Edit:- Bernard ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by SpeedyPC; 08-20-08 at 08:58 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | ||
中国水兵
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: East of the Firth of Forth
Posts: 273
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
The main problem the U-Boats had was that they were too 'talkative.' Old technology brought up to date: High-Frequency Direction Finding (Huff-Duff) caught their radio transmissions 90% of the time from mid-43 onwards. That's why I keep 'schtumm' after leaving port. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
http://www.uboat.net/technical/detectors.htm
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Everytime I see an enemy aircraft, I submerge. Usually it's voluntary, but sometimes it has not been
![]()
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: on patrol
Posts: 1,035
Downloads: 40
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I wonder, if you replace your Metox with modern system (like Naxos), will it be able to detect an older type of radar emission?
For example, the Naxos is a S-band detector, but what if the airplane still has a older VHF band radar? Wil you be able to detect it with Naxos? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|